Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T05PI00008
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2005 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The following are comments for T05PI00008: 1. Sheet 3 of 8: Sentinal Stone - Please call out the new curb access on the east side of Sentinal Stone at the pedestrian access. 2. Sheet 4 of 8: Station 15+53 - The note at this location corresponds to a new curb access ramp and should be note 5(storm drains). 3. Sheet 7 of 8: Please call out the new curb access ramp on Baja Stone at approximately Sta 11+70. No further comments (7/7/05) |
| 07/11/2005 | THAD HARVISON | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | I reviewed the subject plans and have the following comments: 1. The consultant must obtain utility clearance letters from the effected utilities. 2. Sheet 1 of 8: Please remove the "City of Tucson Traffic Department" signature line, the title block already has this signature line. 3. Sheet 1 of 8: Book and Page. 4. Sheet 1 of 8: Provide the City Floodplain Permit number issued for issues impacting City right-of-way. 5. Sheet 1 of 8: Add the following comment: Truncated Domes shall be provided on all access ramps per Federal ADA requirements. 6. Sheet 2 of 8: Depict proposed Stormdrains in profile view. 7. Sheet 2 of 8: Provide a minimum 2% cross slope (DS 3-01.4.5) for all of the roadways within the subdivision (TYPICAL COMMENT). 8. Sheet 2 of 8: Call out local gutter depression (if applicable) for proposed catch basins (TYPICAL COMMENT). 9. Sheet 3 of 8: Detail (provide a drawing on the plan detailing ramp configuration and related items) each type of access ramp on plans TYPICAL COMMENT. I have included in the redlines ramp details for your information. 10. Sheet 4 of 8: Call out curb transition (Detail 210) for each catch basin (TYPICAL). 11. Sheet 8 of 8: Provide 2% cross slope for each roadway prism. 12. Sheet 8 of 8: Detail G: Provide a structure with one manhole (one structure) instead of two (the structures are only 2' apart?). revise. In addition provide section view through storm drain junction including pipe inverts and station and offsets. 13. Sheet 8 of 8: Detail F: Provide the required offset (2' per the City Grading Ordinance) from the PL to the hinge point. 14. Sheet 8 of 8: Remove this detail, see comment 5 above. 15. Sheet 8 of 8: Pavement Section must be based on geo-technical pavement design report for the type materials used to build-up roadway. Revise 16. Sheet 8 of 8: Call out the type of asphalt to be used for the roadway surface. |
| 07/18/2005 | DALE KELCH | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this PIA submittal: 1. Sheet 1, general note 1: what is the posted speed of these roadways? 2. Sheet 1, general note 13: The title of the referenced manual is the "Manual ON Uniform Traffic Control Devices" not the "Manual of...." 3. Sheet 1, general note 14: This not is duplicate. All of this verbiage is contained in general note 18. 4. Show new R1-1 signs on sheets 2, 7. 5. Show new R2-1(25) signs on sheets 2, 4, 7. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/19/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/20/2005 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/28/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED | Completed | |
| 07/28/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |