Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T05PI00005
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2005 | THAD HARVISON | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | I have reviewed the subject PIA and have the following comments: 1. Cover Page: The title block is not in accordance to the PIA title block. Attached is the correct Title Block. 2. Cover Page: The Plan No. "G-2003-022" reference must be removed for cover and all sheets. 3. Sheet 2: The attached notes must be added in the Paving notes. 4. Sheet 2: Wilmot Road detail (Detail A) must indicate 2% slope in the shoulder areas. 5. Sheet 2: Wilmot Road detail (Detail A) must indicate curbing and type of curbing. 6. Sheet 5: Channel centerline (Detail F) must be defined by Station and offset relative to roadway stationing. 7. Sheet 5: Channel centerline (Detail G) dimension scupper length. 8. Sheet 6: The plan view shows a channel along Wilmot Road. However, I believe that the ordinal approved Drainage Report and onsite approved paving plans convey the development runoff onsite and within stormdrains into the Julian Wash, and not within the Wilmot Road r/w. Please redesign channel to convey runoff generated within the Wilmot roadway r/w only. 9. Sheet 7: Call out detail for ramps on Via Rio Pico, and include the details in the plans. 10. Sheet 8: Call out station and offset for both inlet and outlet (Typical), and call out headwall type for outlet. 11. Sheet 9: The plan view indicates nine 18" RCP's, can the number of pipes be reduced by increasing the pipe size? 12. Sheet 10: Call out ramps (typical). 13. Sheet 14: Provide pavement taper and thickened edge, see attached details. 14: Sheet 15: Double ramp on the SE corner of Camino Boleadoras and wilmot? revise with standard ramp. 15. Sheet 16: Extend sidewalk along the west end of Via Rio Pico to match the east end of Via Rio Pico. 16. Provide 100' vertical curves for changes in grade greater than 1% (typical). |
| 03/28/2005 | THAD HARVISON | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 23, 2005 TO: PIA Coordinator FROM: Richard Leigh, EA Development Services Department Permits & Code Section Department Of Transportation SUBJECT: Wilmot Road at Desert Stone Paving plan plan T05PI00004 (First Review) T 15 S, R 15E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Paving Plan The Paving Plans cannot be approved as submitted. Please have the following review comments addressed prior to the next submittal. Paving Plan: Remove signature lines for Pima County Waste Water, City of Tucson, Parks and Recreation and Tucson Water from the cover sheet. Revise title block to reflect attached sample title block. All strip paving will requires a thickened edge treatment, see attached detail. Any proposed sidewalk along a roadway listed on the “City of Tucson Major Streets and Roadway” needs to be a minimum of six (6) foot wide. Provide a tapered pavement section treatment starting at Sta. 47+33.03. 29.23’ LT (Wilmot Road) and 68+00, 11.00’ LT (Wilmot Road), see attached detail. Provide a curb terminal section per PC/COT Sta. Dtl. 212 at all curb terminations. Label the proposed curb access ramp at Sta. ± 51+20, 50.00’ LT. Provide a complete detail of the proposed sidewalk scupper at Sta. 57+54.76, 39.00’ LT on plan set. Provide complete details of the proposed box culvert across Wilmot Road on plan set. Provide a survey monument per PC/COT Sta. Dtl. 103 at the intersections of all public streets within the limits of the proposed new pavement section. Submit an approved drainage report for the proposed improvements in the public right-of-way with subsequent submittal. Submit approved tentative for the associated development with subsequent submittal. Add administrative address on cover sheet. Add developer and or owners information on cover sheet. Provide a legend for the symbols, hatching and lines used on cover sheet. Resubmit paving plans only when plans are 100% complete and sealed by engineer-of-record. Please add the following notes to the General/Paving Notes of the Paving Plans: The City shall not be held liable for any errors and/or omissions on these plans. Items not meeting City Standards shall be repaired/replaced at no cost to the City. All Drainage infrastructures, indicated on the plans, are in accordance to the approved Drainage Report approved by Development Services Department. The Engineer of Record shall submit to the City for acceptance any changes to the approved plans prior to construction. Additionally, the Engineer of Record shall certify all changes meeting all applicable standards, codes, and ordinances. A Floodplain Use Permit No. has been issued by Development Services Department for work impacting City and FEMA Floodplains. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (520) 792-2593 or Rleigh1@tucsonaz.gov. Richard Leigh Engineering Associate DOT, Engineering, Permits & Code Unit 201 N. Stone Ave, 4th Floor Tucson AZ, 85701 520-791-5100 Rleigh1@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/01/2005 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet 3 of 65 - Section C-C and B-B seem to show a different thickness for the rip rap. Please clarify the thickness. That is the only comment. |
| 04/05/2005 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | January 24, 2005 PIA – Landscape Review By Gary Wittwer T05PI00005 Wilmot Road – Frontage Road to Union Pacific Railroad Comments: Page 1 of 65 “Pacific” is spelled wrong in the title block. Landscape Sheet 1 of 11 Please identify who will do the maintenance and for how long. Typically 1 year with plant guarantee. Monthly inspections by LA of record. Notes 2-8 are shown under the overall heading of maintenance. ????? Note #4 (This is a long way from Stone Ave) Please change the note or remove it. Note #6. Show SVT on Plan. Note #7. D.G. locations on the plan are not clear. Show limits or symbols. Note #8. Grading note- This does not work for water harvesting. You need to develop cross-section details or a grading plan. Safety at edge of paving and ped waling areas. Seed mix list is O.K but not clear where it goes. No symbol or call out on plan. How does it work with D.G.? On plant legend – we do not want “Standard” Catclaw or Blue Palo Verde trees. Under irrigation notes #7 – Do you have written permission from Union Pacific Railroad to go under the tracks? Page 2 of 11 At sta. 24+00 L. Identify the rock basin and cross ref. To where the details are or screen out. It looks like riprap to be installed by Landscape Contractor. I am very concerned about the new planting located on the west side of the road starting at Los Reales. When the other side of the road is built out, where will the utilities be located? OH power and possibly one sewer line? Are we placing these trees in an area that will be impacted later? Relocating a second time will be costly. On the SE corner of Los Reales #61 TOS is outside the ROW> Page 3 of 11 From Sta. 33+00 to 50+00 same comment as #2 on Sheet 2 of 11. Page 4 of 11 This is the first page that indicates S.G. Please show limits. Will it be in all areas? Page 6 of 11. The symbols in the legend do not match what’s on the plan. RCV, Hose End and no symbol for emitters in legend but circles are shown on plan. Please check with Tucson Water on meter sizes. 5/8” or 1” – Don’t think they make ¾”. The Calsensce controller should be ET 2000-16- LR-RR-SSE. The remote control valve should be a “dirty water” valve. Show power source or cross reference to electrical plan. Page 10 of 11 Detail #1 – Please shows a multi-trunk tree. Please note D.G. depth over rootball to be 1” deep. Detail #5 – Please show ground rod outside of controller box. Detail #6. Remove Battery controller note. Remove (¾”) from pea gravel note. The pull box size must be #7 min. Please show PVC sch 80 unions on both sides of the RCV. Detail #7 is only used with reclaim water systems. Detail #8. All sleeving under roadways shall be at 30” depth. Please show tracer wire on all PVC lines not in same trench as RC wires. The backfill around pipes needs to be screened for rocks larger that 1”. Detail #9 – Remove ¾” from pea gravel note. Detail #12 – Add a note that PVC riser is to be threaded. Page 11 of 11 Detail #16 is a little over-kill for support of a ¾” backflow. (O.K. if you want to pay for it) DATE: March 30, 2005 TO: Gary Wittwer FROM: Joseph Linville Landscape Architect Lead Planner SUBJECT: T05PI0005 I have reviewed the native plant preservation plans for the project and offer the following comments: The plans should be revised to clarify the location of the temporary nursery. Notes should indicate that temporary fencing per DS 2-06-Figure will be installed at the project limits for the duration of construction per DS 2-15.6.0 3) The Salvage and Mitigation Analysis requires revision as to the existing nature of the site and compliance with the Endangered Species Act. The Plan shall affirm, by a statement on the Plan, conformance with the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law. LUC 3.8.4.5 |
| 04/07/2005 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 04/12/2005 | DALE KELCH | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this PIA submittal and offers the following comments: 1. Pacific is consistently misspelled "Pacfic" throughout the plan set. 2. Add street names or identify as driveway all additional accesses from Wilmot that lie on the west side of Wilmot Road. Some pages have these identified, others do not. 3. What will happen to the identified water meter near station 45+35 on sheet 7/35 (DET5/5)? 4. If the depicted median curb is not to be constructed with this project then don't show it. It leads to confusion and difficulty in reading the plans. 5. Sheets 20-22/65 have call outs to see sheet __ Wilmot Road plans. Please fill in the blanks. 6. Sheet 21/65, Camino Boeadoras, there is what appears to be a double median in the drawing. Please clarify. 7. Sheet 23/65(ST1/ST4), pavement marking notes are missing notes 14, 16 as listed on sheet 2-1 of PMDM, 2002 edition. 8. Sheet 23/65(ST1/ST4), the striping legend for line types YDS4-D40/D40 and WS12 are incorrectly depicted. 9. Sheet 23/65(ST1/ST4), signing note #10: it is the Traffic Engineering division vice Traffic Engineer. 10. Sheet 23/65(ST1/ST4), striping note#3 and signing note #9 have conflicting posted speeds for Wilmot Road. Clarify. 11. All called out new signs from sheets 24-26/65(ST2-ST4/ST4) are using the symbol for an existing sign. Use the symbol for a new sign in accordance with SDPI, SD100, 2003 edition. 12. Sheet 24/65(ST2/ST4), what are the dimensions of 1' and 13' near station 17+40 referring to? 13. Sheet 24/65(ST2/ST4), some leaders calling out existing R/W on the west side of the roadway point to nothing. 14. Sheet 25/65(ST3/ST4), text delineating stations 40+00 and 50+00 appear to be written twice. Clarify. 15. Sheet 26/65(ST4/ST4), it appears that some layers were inadvertently turned off when plotting this sheet. 16. See redline comments for sheets 35-38/65. 17. Sheet 2/65, why are you referring to "Traffic Control Manual for Highway Construction and Maintenance (ADOT) instead of the MUTCD (2003 Edition)? D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/02/2004 | TAMI ACHONG | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED | Completed | |
| 05/02/2005 | THAD HARVISON | DOT ENGINEERING | UTILITY AWARENESS NOTIFICATION | Denied | I have reviewed the subject PIA and have the following comments: 1. Cover Page: The title block is not in accordance to the PIA title block. Attached is the correct Title Block. 2. Cover Page: The Plan No. "G-2003-022" reference must be removed for cover and all sheets. 3. Sheet 2: The attached notes must be added in the Paving notes. 4. Sheet 2: Wilmot Road detail (Detail A) must indicate 2% slope in the shoulder areas. 5. Sheet 2: Wilmot Road detail (Detail A) must indicate curbing and type of curbing. 6. Sheet 5: Channel centerline (Detail F) must be defined by Station and offset relative to roadway stationing. 7. Sheet 5: Channel centerline (Detail G) dimension scupper length. 8. Sheet 6: The plan view shows a channel along Wilmot Road. However, I believe that the ordinal approved Drainage Report and onsite approved paving plans convey the development runoff onsite and within stormdrains into the Julian Wash, and not within the Wilmot Road r/w. Please redesign channel to convey runoff generated within the Wilmot roadway r/w only. 9. Sheet 7: Call out detail for ramps on Via Rio Pico, and include the details in the plans. 10. Sheet 8: Call out station and offset for both inlet and outlet (Typical), and call out headwall type for outlet. 11. Sheet 9: The plan view indicates nine 18" RCP's, can the number of pipes be reduced by increasing the pipe size? 12. Sheet 10: Call out ramps (typical). 13. Sheet 14: Provide pavement taper and thickened edge, see attached details. 14: Sheet 15: Double ramp on the SE corner of Camino Boleadoras and wilmot? revise with standard ramp. 15. Sheet 16: Extend sidewalk along the west end of Via Rio Pico to match the east end of Via Rio Pico. 16. Provide 100' vertical curves for changes in grade greater than 1% (typical). |
| 05/02/2005 | THAD HARVISON | DOT ENGINEERING | UTILITY AWARENESS NOTIFICATION | Denied | DATE: March 23, 2005 TO: PIA Coordinator FROM: Richard Leigh, EA Development Services Department Permits & Code Section Department Of Transportation SUBJECT: Wilmot Road at Desert Stone Paving plan plan T05PI00004 (First Review) T 15 S, R 15E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Paving Plan The Paving Plans cannot be approved as submitted. Please have the following review comments addressed prior to the next submittal. Paving Plan: Remove signature lines for Pima County Waste Water, City of Tucson, Parks and Recreation and Tucson Water from the cover sheet. Revise title block to reflect attached sample title block. All strip paving will requires a thickened edge treatment, see attached detail. Any proposed sidewalk along a roadway listed on the “City of Tucson Major Streets and Roadway” needs to be a minimum of six (6) foot wide. Provide a tapered pavement section treatment starting at Sta. 47+33.03. 29.23’ LT (Wilmot Road) and 68+00, 11.00’ LT (Wilmot Road), see attached detail. Provide a curb terminal section per PC/COT Sta. Dtl. 212 at all curb terminations. Label the proposed curb access ramp at Sta. ± 51+20, 50.00’ LT. Provide a complete detail of the proposed sidewalk scupper at Sta. 57+54.76, 39.00’ LT on plan set. Provide complete details of the proposed box culvert across Wilmot Road on plan set. Provide a survey monument per PC/COT Sta. Dtl. 103 at the intersections of all public streets within the limits of the proposed new pavement section. Submit an approved drainage report for the proposed improvements in the public right-of-way with subsequent submittal. Submit approved tentative for the associated development with subsequent submittal. Add administrative address on cover sheet. Add developer and or owners information on cover sheet. Provide a legend for the symbols, hatching and lines used on cover sheet. Resubmit paving plans only when plans are 100% complete and sealed by engineer-of-record. Please add the following notes to the General/Paving Notes of the Paving Plans: The City shall not be held liable for any errors and/or omissions on these plans. Items not meeting City Standards shall be repaired/replaced at no cost to the City. All Drainage infrastructures, indicated on the plans, are in accordance to the approved Drainage Report approved by Development Services Department. The Engineer of Record shall submit to the City for acceptance any changes to the approved plans prior to construction. Additionally, the Engineer of Record shall certify all changes meeting all applicable standards, codes, and ordinances. A Floodplain Use Permit No. has been issued by Development Services Department for work impacting City and FEMA Floodplains. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (520) 792-2593 or Rleigh1@tucsonaz.gov. Richard Leigh Engineering Associate DOT, Engineering, Permits & Code Unit 201 N. Stone Ave, 4th Floor Tucson AZ, 85701 520-791-5100 Rleigh1@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/09/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |