Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: T05PI00001
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PIA SUBMITTAL

Plan Number - T05PI00001
Review Name: PIA SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/04/2005 VICTOR DURAND ENGINEERING REVIEW Needs Review DSD Engineering Comments for T05PI00001

1. A revised plan is required by this Department.

2. Plans were compared to the last reviewed tentative plat which was approved by all review agencies but has yet to be signed and approved.

3. Sheet 3: Show pipe on Alley B1 connecting basins adjacent to Avenida Del Sambrador. Minimum pipe size in public right-of-way is 24" RCP unless otherwise approved by TDOT.

4. Sheet 4: CB#11 and 24" pipe to JS not shown on plat.

5. Sheet 4: Indicate north arrows on plan.

6. Sheet 11: Indicate number of grates on strucutre indicated by Keynote #11.

7. Table of Hydraulic Structures does not agree with that shown on tentative plat. Please explain, in detail, significant discrepancies.

Matt Flick, PE
Engineering Manager
7FEB05
02/04/2005 VDURAND1 DOT TRAFFIC REVIEW Denied
02/04/2005 VDURAND1 DOT LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied January 24, 2005
PIA - Landscape Review By Gary Wittwer
T05PI00001 Menlo Park Mercado District - Onsite
Comments:
1. I have no problem with planters and water harvesting.
2. From a safety point of view - you should provide tree grates or have a solid surface to step on in planting areas.
3. Step down into curbed planters is dangerous.
4. I will require a complete landscape and irrigation plan.
5. Who will maintain these trees?
6. Please address NPPO. If already approved - please submit copy.
02/04/2005 THARVIS1 DOT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied
02/04/2005 VDURAND1 DOT STREET MAINTENANCE REVIEW Denied T05PI00001 / Menlo Park Mercado District (Onsite) by Lance Peterson
1) Sheet 2 of 18 - Please verify positive drainage at Station 17+50. It looks like it might pond at this location.
2) Sheet 14 of 18 - Speed Table Detail - In this detail the speed table seems inverted. Is this correct?
3) Sheets 2 - 11- Numerous cross street location with a potential for ponding. Please verify positive drainage at cross streets.
02/04/2005 THARVIS1 DOT ENGINEERING UTILITY AWARENESS NOTIFICATION Denied