Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05OT01236
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/26/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. On sheet S-01 the proposed height for buildings A-F is listed as 22 feet. The plan provides for a 20 foot south perimeter yard. Provide an elevation drawing for said buildings to verify the required perimeter yard or list the height of the south facing exterior building wall on the drawing. Per LUC 3.2.6.4, the south perimeter yard is based on the height of the exterior building wall measured from design grade. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7) 2. Revise the bicycle parking calculation to be based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided times 4%. A total of three (3) bicycle parking spaces are required, of which, two must be Class 2 and one (1) must be Class 1. Calculation shall state the number and class type required and provided. In addition, provide a keynote to indicate the location of the Class 1 parking space and provide a detail. (LUC 3.3.4 "Multi-family dwelling") (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) 3. Revise the location of the curb along Park Avenue to be nine (9) feet from the property line (face of curb). Revise SVT's accordingly. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21) 4. If applicable, existing or proposed easements shall be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference and whether they will be private or public. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 5. Revise the zoning classification for the adjacent property located south of the C-1 zoned lot on the site and landscape plans. Correct zoning is C-2. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) 6. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person. |
| 05/26/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/10/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Landscaping is required along retention basin side slopes, bottom and periphery. Plant materials used in basins shall withstand periodic inundation. A minimum of 20 trees per acre must be provided, 33% of tress shall be 24" box or larger. A minimum of 2 shrubs for each tree is required per DS 10.01. Revise landscape plan to include basin(s) treatment. 2. A 6' wall is required to screen loading zone from adjacent residential zoned properties per LUC 3.7.2-I. All walls required by this Division must be of masonry material or masonry with a stucco or textured finish. Revise notes on landscape plan to identify a wall not a fence. 3. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Additional tree is required for vehicle use area. 4. An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60' showing the site's boundaries, the locations of all Protected Native Plants within those boundaries, and the plants' identification numbers keyed to the inventory list in Sec. 2-15.3.1.A.2. Show the ultimate locations of mitigated Acacia constricta on the landscape plan. 5. At least thirty (30) percent of each genus and species of other Viable Protected Native Plant shall be preserved-in-place or salvaged and transplanted on-site per LUC 3.8.6.2.A.3. A minimum of on Prosopis velutina must be preserved on site. 6. Specify on NPP plan the fencing materials and methods for controlling access to areas of non-disturbance (minimum fencing requirements as specified in Development Standard 2-06.2.2.F). 7. Add note to NPPO plan: All plants shall be tagged with an embossed metal, or approved equal, inventory number which cross references to the inventory list and aerial photograph and color-coded flagging according to the following schedule so that the disposition of each plant can be easily identified. Note that plants that are not Viable and are proposed for destruction require no tagging or flagging. Plants which are Viable and are proposed for destruction require inventory number tags and flagging. 8. Add note to NPP plan: Prior to any site disturbance a pre-grading inspection is required. Inspections may be scheduled by calling the IVR system at (520) 740-6970, inspection #9015 or by calling the Landscape Field Representative directly at 791-5640 Ext. 1140. |
| 06/13/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60' showing the site's boundaries, the locations of all Protected Native Plants within those boundaries, and the plants' identification numbers keyed to the inventory list in Sec. 2-15.3.1.A.2. Show the ultimate locations of mitigated Acacia constricta on the landscape plan. 2. At least thirty (30) percent of each genus and species of other Viable Protected Native Plant shall be preserved-in-place or salvaged and transplanted on-site per LUC 3.8.6.2.A.3. A minimum of on Prosopis velutina must be preserved on site. 3. Specify on NPP plan the fencing materials and methods for controlling access to areas of non-disturbance (minimum fencing requirements as specified in Development Standard 2-06.2.2.F). 4. Add note to NPPO plan: All plants shall be tagged with an embossed metal, or approved equal, inventory number which cross references to the inventory list and aerial photograph and color-coded flagging according to the following schedule so that the disposition of each plant can be easily identified. Note that plants that are not Viable and are proposed for destruction require no tagging or flagging. Plants which are Viable and are proposed for destruction require inventory number tags and flagging. 5. Add note to NPP plan: Prior to any site disturbance a pre-grading inspection is required. Inspections may be scheduled by calling the IVR system at (520) 740-6970, inspection #9015 or by calling the Landscape Field Representative directly at 791-5640 Ext. 1140. |
| 06/20/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Site and Drainage Review - 5555 S. Park Ave. DATE: 20 June 2005 ACTIVITY #'s T05OT01236/T05BU01233 T14S, R14E, Section 6 Engineering Division has reviewed the Subject site plan and Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report. Approval is not recommended at this time. Please provide a revised site plan and drainage report addressing all comments below, and include a response letter addressing in detail how and where each comment has been addressed. Site Plan: 1. Depict scuppers where any site drainage may be concentrated, for conveyance of 10-year flows (min.) under all sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.5.1 E & DS 3-01.4.4 F). 2. Identify and label any existing curb cuts in the adjacent public rights of way, and provide notation on the plans that any unused curb cuts are to be closed (Chapter 25, Tucson Code). 3. Correct the project address on sheet S-01. 4. Provide finished floor elevations for all structures on sheet S-02 (DS 2-02.2.1A 16) 5. Label the detention basin 100-year water surface elevation/limit of ponding (DS 2-02.2.1 A 15). 6. Depict roof drainage flow arrows and corresponding sidewalk scuppers where any site drainage may be concentrated, for conveyance of 10-year flows (min) under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.5.1 E & DS 3-01.4.4 F). 7. Provide a note on the site plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities" (DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2). 8. Include a note to provide ""Install/Apply Detectable Warnings Per ADAAG" in "Zoning & Engineering Note 4". 9. See "greenlines" on plans for additional items adjacent to the Park Avenue right of way in need of revision - and return with the resubmittal package. Please note that new 6' sidewalk to be constructed in the Park Ave. right of way should be constructed relative to the existing curb line, rather than future (MS&R) curb line, unless Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) requests otherwise. Drainage Report: 1. Specify the name, address and telephone # of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, and liability of the drainage improvements described in the report. List any other documents where these responsibilities may be documented, in accordance with Section 2.3.1.2 E of the City of Tucson's Standards Manual For Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (Development Standard 10-02.0). 2. Depict the location and dimension of the proposed detention/retention system on the site plan, as a part of the report, including (a) the location, size and type of inflow and outflow structures, with dimensions and elevations of critical portions of each structure (b) the location(s) and size(s) of maintenance access ramps, (c) clearly marked dimensions of all building and erosion hazard setbacks, with dimensioning between structures and any proposed basins or drainageways provided (d) maximum water surface elevations, and (f) erosion protection (riprap) sizing and dimensions (DS 10-02, Sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 and DS 10-01.5.2.6). 3. Please explain/discuss the use of the runoff coefficient and basin factor used in determining the existing conditions offsite watershed east of this project, and depict the corresponding 100-year ponding limits adjacent to the subject parcel. Refer to the values provided in tables 4.2 and 4.3 of Development Standard 10-02.0. 4. For each significant watercourse (1 acre or greater in size) entering or leaving the site, the contributing drainage area with flow arrows and the 100-year peak discharge must be shown (DS 10-02, Sec. 5.2.4). 5. Provide a copy of the soils report. A soils report is required to be submitted in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. The report shall contain at a minimum, technical information on soil classification, erodibility, permeability, slope stability, groundwater elevation, infiltration rates, recommended minimum building setbacks (from basins and drainageways), whether or not hydro-collapsing soils are present, and contain the results of a minimum 30 foot deep soil boring. Provide discussion/analysis in the drainage report as necessary, demonstrating conformance to retention basin design and performance criteria (DS 10-01.0, Section 3.5.1.5). 6. Please describe and demonstrate how site grading will comply with Chapters 1 and 4, with particular attention/discussion given to how the basin will serve as a project amenity and multi-use facility, and will be visually appealing; whether it will serve as a human activity zone (8:1 H:V slope maximums in such areas), and whether intended as a passive and/or active recreation area (DS 10-01.0). 7. Refer to Section 4.3 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for additional retention/detention technical design guidelines and requirements, and provide applicable discussion and design for conformance with these guidelines (DS 10-01.0). Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, ext. 1189 or via email at Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov. Douglas Williams Sr. Eng. Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2005 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/21/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |