Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T05OT00588
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/13/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/13/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Your response states that a determination request has been made to Craig Gross regarding the previous comment. The previous comment remains until it has been addressed either through Craig's approval or a Lot Development Option. Previous comment: What is the proposed building height? Building setback from the east property line adjacent to R-3 zoning is based on 1.5 times the building height (30' height requires a 45' setback). Building setback may not be verified for compliance until this information has been clearly added to the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7) 2. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person. |
| 07/20/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/20/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Steve Gregor, P.E. DATE: July 22, 2005 Gregor and Grenier Engeering, Inc. 5232 E. Pima Street, Suite A, Tucson, Arizona 85712 SUBJECT: 250 N. Pantano Street Site plan T05OT00588 (Second Review) T15S, R14E, Section 09 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. More specifically the drainageway that conveys the off-site flows of 127.9cfs onto the site. 3. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Site Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage. 3. According to the statement in the "Developed Offsite Drainage" section of the new DR, no calculations were used to determine the amount of off-site flow stated in the new DR. If the amount of flow used in the new DR is from the DR report generated by Cella Barr and Assoc., then include a statement in the new DR that you have reviewed and agree to the data from the previous DR. 4. The proposed development may be less than acre, however the entire site must included and/or considered when developing the remaining portion of the site. The TDOT maps on line indicate that the site is 2.05 acres in size, therefore the 5-year threshold retention requirements are applicable. 5. Explain if the introduction of the proposed building into the 127.9 cfs off-site flow causes any adverse impact upstream. It appears that the offsite flows may go around the transformer to the North and also the South. 6. The transformer in the regulated flow, from off-site, must also be 1' above the WSEL. 7. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/250 N. Pantano Rd. Site2 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/26/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/26/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |