Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05OT00420
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/01/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire hydrant and fire sprinklers required. Submit approved COT Water Plan.(Fire hydrant location indicated on plan is not acceptable.) |
| 03/14/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Per the agreed upon condition of submitting a soils report within 2 weeks of the submittal (2-28-05), the project is denied. 2. A soils report must accompany the resubmittal prior to the review of the project. |
| 03/15/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Kent A. Delph 221 N. Court Ave. #103 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 882-6568 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner Development Service Dept. FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T04OT00420 Tucson Full Gospel Church 3160 N. Craycroft Road Site Plan Review (1st review) TRANSMITTAL: March 17, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed as a new use. Full code compliance is required. 2. Revise the parking calculation to indicate the number of spaces required (84) in the correct place in the calculation table. Add the number of standard spaces provided to the calculation. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4 3. Bicycle parking is required at 8 percent of the vehicle parking spaces provided rather than the vehicle parking spaces required. Revise bicycle parking calculation to indicate the correct number of bike parking spaces required. It appears that the class 1 and class 2 keynotes are reversed on the drawing. Revise. Correct the keynotes to indicate the correct number of spaces to be provided. Also, there is not room in the location shown for class 2 parking for 21 bicycles. Show the location of all class 2 space on the site plan. LUC 3.3.3.5 DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 4. Provide recordation information (docket and page reference) for any easements of record. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 5. Dimension the width of the entrance drive to the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 6. A dumpster (keynote 2) is shown within the far side SVT along Craycroft Road. Dumpsters may not be located within SVT. Revise plan. For clarity, parking detail keynote symbol to be different from the hexagons used for the standard keynote symbols. DS 3-01.5 7. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide connections between the buildings and to the adjacent right-of-way along Craycroft Road per DS 2-08.3.1. Please revise to show pedestrian sidewalk connections. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 8. The proposed one-way PAALs must be striped and signed as "one-way". Show the location of all signage. 9. Label sight visibility triangles (SVT's) as to whether these indicate existing SVT, future SVT, or both. The SVT's are drawn incorrectly. Revise. DS 3-01.5.1 DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 10. Label as to its use or purpose the rectangular shaped box with the brick symbol located to north of the existing house. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 11. Add the property legal description to the plan. The legal description is: SWLY PTN SW4 SW4 SEC 25 & NWLY PTN NW4 NW4 SEC 36, T13S R14E. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 12. Add a general note stating that the project meets the criteria for LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 13. Add the development designator to the notes. The development designator for the religious use in the SR zone is "6". DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 LUC 2.2.4.2.C.4 14. Provide a loading zone calculation based on the religious use. A loading space for the religious use is not required. Add a note stating that no loading spaces are required or provided. DS 2-02.2.2.A.5 15. Show the size and height of the proposed monument sign. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 16. Add building heights and setbacks or the existing residence. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 & 7 17. Label existing and future sidewalks along with the future curb, and dimension them from street monument lines. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21 18. Add a note to the plan stating that this site is within and subject to case number C15-91-2, Swan/Ft. Lowell/Orchard Annexation District. Place the annexation case number in the lower right hand corner of the site plan. Annexation Condition under Section 2. of Ordinance No. 7902 states that portions of a parcel within 200 feet of the Old Fort Lowell Historic District and identified with the notation "HDB" shall be subject to the folllowing additional requirements: a) One-story, 16-foot height limitation. b) Compliance with City Sign Code Regulations for historic districts. c) All lighting must be shielded and directed away from adjacent residential areas. d) Development proposals shall be submitted by the developer to the Ft. Lowell Historic District Advisory Board for review and comment. Demonstrate compliance with all annexation conditions prior to site plan approval. Contact Frank Podgorski of the City Development Services Dept. for guidance and information related to Ft. Lowell Historic District Advisory Board review If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/17/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/18/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Landscape plan comments: 1. A twenty-five 25' minimum height clearance, free of any overhead obstructions (wires, branches, etc.), shall be provided above the refuse collection site per DS 6-01.4.3.G. Relocate trees as necessary. 2. A 5' wall to screen residential zoned properties from vehicle use area to the south is indicated on landscape plan. Include the wall on site plan as well per DS 2-01.2.1.C 3. Include details of planter islands within vehicle use area. Inside dimensions shall be a minimum of 4' per LUC 3.7.2.3A.1.c Additional comments: RE: The Fort Lowell Neighborhood Plan. 1) Per TCC Sec. 26-1.3. "All river and basic management plans, or other land use plans approved by the mayor and council, are hereby incorporated into this chapter and made a part thereof by reference". The Fort Lowell Neighborhood Plan applies to floodplain development on this site. Revise as necessary. 2) Per Sec TCC Sec. 26-5.2. (1), development "in the floodway fringe is required to conform to adopted city land use plans for the design of public and private development in the floodplain". The Fort Lowell Neighborhood Plan applies to floodplain development on this site. Revise as necessary. 3) Sec TCC Sec. 26-5.2. (4), development in the floodway fringe "may not unnecessarily alter riparian habitats of watercourse and adjacent bank areas". The parcel is designated as Critical and Sensitive Biological Community, (Shaw 1986) & is designated by Pima County as Hydroriparian or Mesoriparian and as an Important Riparian Area under the Conservation Lands System of the the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. 4) Fort Lowell Neighborhood Plan This project is subject to the provisions of the Fort Lowell Neighborhood Plan. 1.2.5 Applicants for development projects are encouraged to consult with the Old Fort Lowell Neighborhood Association and provide the Association a project summary. In addition, per Ordinance 7902 development proposals are required to be submitted to the Fort Lowell Historic Advisory Board for review and comment. 5) The following elements are examples of the plan policies. After consultation with the Neighborhood Association and Historic Advisory Board, revise the development proposal to comply with the plan. Additional policies may apply. GOAL 2: NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Because the Neighborhood contains some of the few remaining areas in urban Tucson that are significant examples of the original ecosystems, ecosystems which are an important part of the regional heritage as well as a valuable natural resource, fragile and irreplaceable, THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD BE PROTECTED, PRESERVED, AND ENHANCED. "Policy 2.1. Promote natural ecosystems by the following means: 2.1.1. Encourage protection, preservation, and enhancement of significant areas of native vegetation and wildlife habitats and corridors along washes, fence lines, hedges, and roadways. 2.1.2. Encourage application of flexible design concepts, such as clustering, where permissible, and where the use of such concepts would minimize the disturbance of floodplains and other ecosystems. 2.1.5. Require local storm water drainage to be designed and constructed so as to flow to a logical conclusion without creating adverse impacts on adjacent land uses or existing drainage and irrigation facilities. Wherever possible, direct runoff to benefit landscaped and naturally vegetated areas. 2.1.6. Encourage, wherever feasible, unstructured, rather than structured, means of protection from drainage runoff and flood. 2.1.7. Encourage preservation of the Mesquite Bosque together with the Corbett Irrigation Ditch. 2.1.8 Requires that owners or developers of the Mesquite Bosque submit, prior to any rezoning hearing, or if rezoning is not required, prior to the review of a development plan or tentative plat, an analysis of measures proposed to preserve the Bosque, and to mitigate the impact of the proposed development on the Bosque. Analysis shall be submitted and reviewed in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.2.5. of this Plan". "The Fort Lowell Mesquite Bosque is a distinctive forest of large mesquites with a dense understory and a varied population of reptiles, mammals and birds. It has become not only a place to enjoy native vegetation and wildlife, but also one of a series of environmental focal points for the people of Tucson, symbolic of the character and atmosphere of the Neighborhood". OFLNP 3.1.7. Encourage builders and developers to consult, in the early stages of their planning, with the Old Fort Lowell Neighborhood Association regarding the compatibility of proposed buildings and landscaping with the architectural styles and vegetation of the Neighborhood. |
| 03/28/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the native plant preservation plan to include a summary by genus and species that details the total numbers of all Protected Native Plants inventoried and the calculations used to determine, by genus and species, the numbers of replacement plants, if any, to be provided as mitigation for Protected Native Plants transplanted on-site, removed from the site, or destroyed DS 2-15.3.4.B. These items should appear in the Salvage and Mitigation Report and on the plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2005 | GBONILL1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/28/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |