Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T05CM06350
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2006 | DOUG LAAKSO | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | .. T05CM06350-1 .. 2560 S KOLB ROAD .. WALGREEN'S CANOPY .. DGL .. 2ND REVIEW .. 2/10/06 .. S1. See prior comment S2. Clarify code review checklist and site plan, original file permit drawings for this building show two-hour walls between Walgreens and adjacent tenants in this shopping strip center. (S2. Provide Completed code review checklist by Architect of Record.) S2. See prior comment S4. Coordinate Construction Type on T1.0, III-1HR, with code review checklist submitted, V-B, original permit drawings indicate Construction Type V-B/AS. (S4. Utilize current Code designations on drawings, ref T1.0.) S3. See prior comment S5. Provide this information on the site plan, see item S1 above. (S5. The Type of Construction is limited to a single Type of Construction for a Building, if more than one Type of Construction exists show required Fire Walls and Hourly fire-rating of these Walls on the drawings.) S4. Provide darker copies of Architectural Details D3, D4 ,D6, D7 and parapet and provide these Details on the drawings. S5. The original file permit drawings for this building show a one-hour requirement at the overhang, provide the same one-hour fire-rating at the repaired overhang. Detail One-hour at the overhang on drawings, provide construction details and copy of the Fire listing on drawings. S6. Clarify roof slope as the original drawings show a 3-1/8 inch slope over 9 feet, from the front of the overhang to the exterior wall of the building vs one inch slope shown on drawing A1.0. S7 See prior comment S8. Clarify addressing to provide 15inch high letters minimum, ref 1/A1.0. (S9. Provide addressing per Pima County Addressing Ordinance.) S8. See prior comment S10. (S10. Structural review and comments will take place when readable drawings are submitted, see comment S3 above.) 1. Provide copy of Structural Engineer's Report on failure with re-submittal. 2. Address items listed in the Structural Engineer's Report. 3. Show in structural calculations where front facia is accounted for as a point load at the end of the cantilever, typical three types of beams. 4. Show in structural calculations where side facia continuous load is accounted for in edge beam calculations. 5. Provide in structural calculations a statement of the adequacy of the deflection of interior and edge beams to provide drainage for the roof as well as your criteria for deflection for the overhang. 6. Address the fact that a channel is used as the north edge beam and is twisted , provide structural calculations and structural details on the drawings to correct this. 7. Fully document loads in structural calculations. 8. Provide Special Inspection for the structural repair of the overhang. 9. Submit two sets of shop drawings and calculations, stamped and signed by an Arizona Registered Engineer, shop drawings shall be reviewed by and bear the approval of the Engineer or Architect of Record prior to submission to the City of Tucson, Development Services Department for approval prior to erection for the Pre-fabricated Wood Roof Trusses. Questions? Call Douglas Laakso Structural Plans Examiner for the City of Tucson Development Services Department at (520) 791-5550 x1111. |
| 02/13/2006 | BOB SUBA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/21/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/21/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |