Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM06116
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 7, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM06116 PROJECT NAME: Los Reales Branch PROJECT ADDRESS: 369 West Valencia Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DRAINAGE REPORT, GEOTECHNICIAL REPORT (Soil's Report) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or microfilmed for record keeping purposes. The current font measures to 10 point, it must be at least 12 point or greater in size. Revise all lettering to be at least 12 point. 2. Provide future sight visibility triangles on the site plan. Provide the length dimension with the SVT notation. The SVT length must be clearly indicated on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 3. Indicate drainage patterns and finish grades on the site plan. Show the symbol in the legend. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 4. Based on the cut and fill quantities this site is required to have a grading plan review and a grading permit. It is recommended to submit a grading permit application card (the green card) and grading plan with the second submittal. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 5. A stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is required with the grading permit when there is an acre or more of disturbance. Submit a SWPPP with the grading permit application with the second submittal. 6. Provide the recordation information (book and page) for Valencia Road. Label the road as private or public. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 7. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS 2-08.4.1.E. 8. Sidewalks must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of a curb, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means. DS 2-08.4.1. 9. Per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG) for an ingress/egress to an arterial street 25' curb returns are required. Indicate 25' curb returns for the ingress/egresses to Valencia Road. TMAG was adopted on March 17, 2003 by Mayor and Council. 10. Valencia Road is a Major Street and Route per the MS&R ROW Plan. New sidewalks located within the ROW along an MS&R Street are required to have 6' sidewalks along the entire length of the street frontage. Revise the site plan to show 6' sidewalks along entire length of the street frontage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. 11. Dimension from street centerline to the 6' sidewalk. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 12. Show the location of the future sidewalk for Valencia Road. DS 2-02.2.1.A19. 13. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. 14. When PAALs are designated as fire lanes or access for solid waste collection vehicles a minimum of an 18' unobstructed radius is required. Revise accordingly. DS 3-05.3.a. 15. Show on the site plan existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 16. This property is not affected by Floodplain. It is not in a FEMA floodplain or a City of Tucson Flood Hazard area. Remove general note number 9 it is not applicable to this project. 17. Approximately 3-4 feet of the landscape border is located within the ROW. The landscape border must be located entirely on the property. Revise accordingly. 18. This property lies within the boundaries of a "Balanced Drainage Basin," which requires a detention basin facility that ensures a reduction in the existing 2, 10 and 100 year peak discharge from the site. In addition the subject site is over an acre in size which requires retention. In short this means a drainage report and a geotechnical report must be submitted with the second submittal. For drainage report content requirements refer to the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management 2.3.1. Refer to Chapter 14 of the same manual, section 2.6 for the requirements of a detention/retention basin soil's report. 19. Be advised the detention/retention basin must meet the Multiple Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines found in Chapter 4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. 20. Additional comment in subsequent reviews may be forthcoming. |
| 01/11/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.2.0.C. |
| 01/11/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise lettering and dimensions to be the equivalent of twelve point or greater in size. 2. The street landscape border is to be located on site and measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line. For information on the location of the MS&R right-of-way line, refer to LUC 2.8.3.4. Landscape border must be located on-site. 3. There are situations where the LUC allows up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) feet of landscaping to be located within the right-of-way. The required landscaping may be located within the right-of-way only if there are no utilities within the same area, the required landscaping area is extended only to the back of sidewalk, and the City Engineer's Office approves such use in the right-of-way. 4. The oasis area limitations in Sec. 3.7.2.2.C.3 and turf area restrictions in Sec. 3.7.2.5 do not apply to: Outdoor recreation facilities, whether under public or private ownership, for public use, schools, day care centers; Specify the use of turf area. 5. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g 6. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, sprinklers for lawn areas, low-flow bubblers, or drip irrigation. 7. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.2.0.C. 8. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/28/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul Planner Technician PROJECT: T05CM06116 369 West Valencia road Church TRANSMITTAL: COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This review is for a church in the O-3 zone (LUC Section 2.4.3.2.B.8). The Development Designator "18" for Religious Use (LUC Section 3.2.3.2.A). The Perimeter Yard Indicator is CC (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). This site expansion is greater that twenty-five percent (25%) and is required to meet full code compliance. 2. Please provide dimensioned elevation drawings (DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 & .7 and LUC Section 3.2.6.4). Also note that the building height has been called out as fourteen feet four inches (14'-4") in the general notes number six and nineteen feet (19'-0") in the AHD calculations. 3. Please provide a floor plan with dimensions. This is necessary to confirm the square footage for parking calculations (DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 and DS 2-02.2.2.A.4). It appears that there shall be some revision of the parking area and calculation due to the Fire Department requirements. Also provide wheel stops, with dimensions where ever parking spaces may overhang any pedestrian refuge, sidewalks or required landscaping (DS 3-05.2.3.C.2). 4. Please provide bicycle parking on the site plan. A dimensioned detail is provided but no location has been identified on the site plan. Also provide materials for lighting and provide directional signage if the bicycle rack is not visible from the street (DS 2-02.1.A.9). 5. Please identify the location, type, size and height of all existing and proposed signage on the site. Also identify any billboards on or on the properties adjacent to this site (DS 2-02.2.1.A.13). 6. Please provide the future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10). 7. Clearly depict with dimensions and use all easements of record with the docket and page. Also provide any proposed easements on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.A.20). 8. Please provide any existing and proposed freestanding lighting, with type and layout, on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.25). 9. Please provide the existing use just before or with the proposed use (DS 2-02.2.1.A.31). 10. Please provide the floor area of each building (DS 2-02.2.2.A.2). 11. Please revise the handicapped ramp for the handicapped parking loading aisle. Provide truncated domes, as the detectable warnings, at the transition from the aisle to the flush curb of the sidewalk. The minimum depth of the pad for the truncated domes is twenty-four inches (24") and should expand the full width of the sidewalk and aisle transition on the sidewalk. The detectable warning should be located between six (6") and eight (8") inches from the edge of the curb located at the transition from the aisle and the sidewalk. (Please see IC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sections 406.13.1, 406.13.2 and 705.5). Please contact me when you have made all the corrections and are ready to submit. We may be able to approve this over the counter. (791-5608 X1184) |
| 01/30/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning review comments. |
| 12/22/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Minimum 18 ft. turn radii required where located on plan. 2. Fire lane signs required where noted on plan. 3. It appears that sidewalk obstructs access to site. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/02/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |