Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 2ND
Permit Number - T05CM06040
Review Name: REVISION - - 2ND
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2008 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/11/2008 | DAVE WITT | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T05CM06040 12/16/08 1020 E. GANLEY RD. PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN. SCOPE OF REVIEW: THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, MODEL ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2006 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ¼ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE. 2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS. 3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES. FOUNDATION: 1. PROVIDE A FOOTING UNDER THE COLUMN SUPPORTING THE BEAM OVER THE KITCHEN AND A FOOTING ALSO UNDER THE LEFT END OF THE BEAM. 2. PROVIDE FOOTINGS UNDER THE TWO BEARING WALLS AT THE BATHROOM. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. THE DOUBLE 2X10 BEAM OVER THE BATH #2 APPEARS TO BE INADEQUATE. DID YOU MEAN A 4X12 0R A 6X10 #2 DF ? PLEASE ANALYZE THE R VALUE OF THE ROOF. SINCE THE FRAMING HAS CHANGED THE ENERGY CODE MUST BE MET. 2. THE 4X8 PORCH BEAM SHOULD BE SPEC'D AS DF #1 AND BETTER. 3. THE 4X12 #2 DF APPEARS TO BE INADEQUATE OVER THE KITCHEN FOR THE 14 FOOT SPAN. 4. THE4X6 #2 DF @ 16" OC APPEARS TO BE INADEQUATE TO SPAN17'2" OVER THELIVING ROOM AND BEDROOMS. DETAIL 1 / 3 SAYS 12" OC. PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT'S THERE. THE LIVING ROOM ALSO HAS 2 X 8 ROOF JOISTS……? RAFTERS ARE PITCHED AND JOISTS ARE LEVEL. WHICH ARE THEY. SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES: 1. 2, 3 / 3 ; DESCRIBE THE PLATE AND THE CONNECTION TO THE FLOOR. 2. 5 / 3 ; PROVIDE SAG-RESISTANT ½" GYP BD ON CEILING. 3. 6 / 3 ; PROVIDE REINFORCEMENT OF THE MASONRY COLUMN AND A FOOTING. 4. 6 / 3 ; PROVIDE A P.T. PLATE BOLTED TO THE FLOOR AND PROVIDE A LOAD PATH THAT WORKS IN TENSION. ILLUSTRATE THE THIRD STUD IN THE FRAMED POST. 5. 6 / 3 ; DESCRIBE THE BEAM TO MASONRY CONNECTION HARDWARE. 6. A-A / 4 ; DID YOU MEAN FOR THE EXTERIOR FOOTING DETAIL TO REFER TO AN INTERIOR FOOTING DETAIL? MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. PLEASE SIZE THE R/A DUCT. M1403.1 ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. CIRCUIT #7 IS HALF OF THE RANGE CIRCUIT AND CAN'T BE USED ELSE WHERE. MODEL ENERGY CODE: 1. PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS PER THE 1998 IECC, OR COMPLY WITH IRC CHAPTER 11. 2. CALL OUT ON THE PLANS THE "R" VALUES OF INSULATION, AS WELL AS THE "U" VALUES OF THE WINDOWS AND DOORS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS PROVIDED. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER: DAVE WITT @ 837-4910 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/26/2008 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |