Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T05CM05773
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/15/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The civil drawings have not been resubmitted to show how the coordination issues noted in the previous review have been addressed. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. |
| 03/15/2006 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | 1) Comply to fire department comments. 2) Show support details of exhaust hood. Show all connection details. |
| 03/15/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment addressed in the reply letter but not shown on the drawings. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference Section 803.2.8, IECC 2003. 2. The range has been deleted from the mechanical and plumbing drawings but it is still shown as a gas range on sheet A2.1 (keynote 18) and is included as an electric range on panel P1 (Sheet E3.1) Coordinate the drawings as required. Either provide a Type I hood over the (gas or electric) range in the kitchen or delete the range. Reference Section 507.2.3, IMC 2003. |
| 04/22/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 04/22/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. Comment two was not addressed. PLease verify with Patricia Gehlen if a separate site plan or development is required for the recreation building. 2. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the CDRC approved tentative plat/development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plan packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The tentative plat/development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. 3. Zoning will re-review and approve the building plans on the next submittal providing the stamped and approved site plans are included with the building plan package and the building structural portions of the plan review have been approved. See comment 2 for additional info regarding the site plan process. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |