Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T05CM05563
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/14/2005 | WILDAN | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | December 13, 2005 City of Tucson Development Services Department 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: 5081 SOUTH FREEMONT AVENUE – 2nd REVIEW CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO T05CM05563 WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-5029 The second review of the above-referenced project has been completed. The following items reflect original comments, which remain unaddressed and require a written response indicating any action to be taken. In order to facilitate a shorter back-check time, we request that you provide two (2) COMPLETE sets of revised plans and calculations, which highlight any changes made to the previous submittal. Please replace all revised drawing sheets, in all sets of plans, before returning to Willdan for the follow-up plan review. Please return comment drawings with your re-submittal. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner John Stigalt.. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms R-3 Carport Patio N/A IIIB 1360 336 140 No Yes GENERAL COMMENTS: This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2003 IRC, 1997 UAC, 2000 IMC, 2000 IECC, 2002 NEC codes with local modifications, and the 1994 UPC with State of Arizona Amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet 5 Show justification on the plans by using the 1/300 calculation instead of the 1/150. To use the 1/300 calculation there must be more than 50% but not more than 80% of the ventilation is to be at the upper half of the space to be vented at least 3’ above the eave or cornice or a vapor barrier with a minimum of 1 perm is to be installed. Reference section R806.2 IRC. Comment remains. Not addresses. Show justification on the plans by using the 1/300 calculation instead of the 1/150. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet 3 In the truss calculations, please include in the calculations the weight of the roof top HVAC unit. Reference sections R301.1 and R802.10.1 IRC. Comment Remains. Not addressed. Include in the truss calculations the weight of the roof top HVAC unit. PLUMBING COMMENTS: Please revise the fixture unit schedule to reflect the fixture unit numbers assigned in Table 6-3 and 7-3 of the 94 UPC. Please include all appliances in the fixture unit schedule. The hose bibs were not included in the fixture unit schedule. Reference section 103.2.3 of the 1994 UPC. Comment Remains. Did not address. Fixture unit schedule must reflect the fixture unit numbers assigned in Table 6-3 and 7-3 of the 94 UPC. Please include all appliances in the fixture unit schedule. The hose bibs were not included in the fixture unit schedule. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Sheet 8 Please remove all reference(s) to the “Uniform” codes and replace with the current adopted code that is the 2003 IRC. Reference the City of Tucson adopted codes. Comment remains. Not addressed. Please see redline for changes that need to be made. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Sheet 6 Please provide cut sheets and calculations for all the exterior light fixtures. The calculations shall be based on the maximum wattage that the fixture is listed for which will provide the maximum lumens per fixture. Reference the City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Comment remains. Please provide cut sheets to support calcs provided. Annotate on the plans that the current adopted code is the 2003 IRC. Reference the City of Tucson adopted codes. Comment remains. Not addressed. Please see redline for changes that need to be made. Please show how the wiring in the laundry room will be protected. Reference section E3702.3.2 IRC. Comment remains. Not addressed. Please indicate how wiring will be protected in the laundry room. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: Sheet 3 The plans indicate that R-19 with 2” x 6” walls are to be used yet the energy calculations indicate that R-13 with 2” x 4” walls are to be used. Please clarify. Reference section R106.1.1 IRC. Comment remains. Not addressed. Please clarify whether R-19 with 2” x 6” walls are to be used or R-13 with 2” x 4” walls are to be used and coordinate plans with calcs. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: Not part of this review Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner John Stigalt.. Sincerely WILLDAN Martin Haeberle, C.B.O. Building Official MAH/cc |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/16/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |