Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T05CM05332
Parcel: 10821328B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T05CM05332
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/08/2005 CHRISTY FOREMAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1) CLARIFY LOCATION, DISTANCE TRAVELED, AND ACCESSIBILTY OF RESTROOM FACILITIES. RESTROOMS APPEAR TO NOT BE ACCESSIBLE. CHAPT 3409.6 CLARIFY 20 % COST OF CONSTRUCTION IS BEING SPENT TOWARDS METTING ANSI A117.1 2003.

2) PROVIDE FULL WALL SECTION FOR EACH CONDITION AND CLARIFY LATERAL BRACING IF REQUIRED. PROVIDE FLOOR BRACING FOR WALLS THAT ARE NOT FULL HEIGHT. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCS. TO JUSTIFY YOUR DETAIL. SEE SECTION 1621.1.2.
11/08/2005 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
11/08/2005 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T05CM05332 11/2/05

1. With TEP peak demand of 185.5 KW, or 884.0 A at 0.85 pf, (884) (1.25) = 1105.0 A. 1105.0 + 97.1 = 1202.1 A. This overloads the 1200 A service. Reference NEC 220.35. Suggest that some of the items removed with demo be accounted for in your load calculations, and that the existing heaters be removed from the new load.
2. (3) 750 Al conductors have ampacity of (3) (385) = 1155 A, which is not sufficient for the 1202 A electrical load.
11/08/2005 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
11/08/2005 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
11/21/2005 CAGUILA1 WWM REVIEW Needs Review
11/21/2005 CAGUILA1 ZONING REVIEW Needs Review