Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T05CM05232
Parcel: 13631012E

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T05CM05232
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/05/2006 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
01/06/2006 BROWN & ASSOCIATES 2ND PARTY REVIEW REVIEW Denied Brown & Associates
177 N Church Avenue, Suite 311
Tucson, Arizona 85701
Office (520) 882-4735 Fax (520) 882-5412


RESIDENTIAL 2nd PLAN REVIEW

Client: City of Tucson Reviewer: L. Pudvah

Project: 9710 E. Millmar SFR Permit #: T05-CM05232

Date: 6 January 2006 Brown & Associates #: 85701-5069

_______________________________________________________________

2003 International Residential Code, Outdoor Lighting Code.

Residence Area: 2150 S.F. Number of Floor Levels: 2
Garage Area: n/a S.F. Number of Elevation Options: 1
Stair/Deck Area: n/a S.F. Building Wall Construction: Masonry/Wood
Basement Level Area: 1035 S.F. Building Grade Floor Construction:Concrete/Wood
Guest House Area: n/a S.F. Building Roof Construction: Wood
Guest House Construction: n/a Elevated Floor Construction: n/a

NOTE: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS NEED TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING YOUR PLANS FOR APPROVAL. RETURN ALL SUBMITTAL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS WITH YOUR REVISED SUBMITTAL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. .
Revise Plans for Compliance
IRC Section R105.3.1

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

1. Provide grades and contours on the site plan, direction of drainage flow and indicate the elevation of the public road at its intersection with the property’s access road. R105, R106 (This can be easily determined at the Pima County map web site).

ARCHITECTURAL PLAN COMMENTS
1. Provide an emergency escape and rescue opening and egress details to grade for the proposed basement. Residential basements are presumed habitable and shall have a least one emergency escape window or door. Review, coordinate and clarify. IRC Section R310.1.

2. Provide a detail for the proposed rafter/attic ventilation. Indicate the size, type, wire mesh and location of required rafter/attic ventilation. Where eave or cornice vents are installed insulation shall not block the free flow of air. A minimum of 1 inch space shall be provided between the insulation and roof sheathing at the location of the vent. IRC Section R806.

3. Roofs that are enclosed by parapets shall be provided with both a primary and an emergency roof drainage system. When scuppers are used, the minimum scupper shall be not less than 4-inches x 4-inches. The overflow scupper shall be located 2-inches above the low elevation of the roof plane. The primary scupper shall be located at the low point of the roof plane. Review and coordinate the design. R903.4.1

ARCHITECTURAL STAIR REQUIREMENTS:

1. The width of each stair landing shall not be less than the stairway served. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension of 36 inches measured in the direction of travel. Provide minimum dimension for intermediate basement stair landing. IRC Section R311.5.4

STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLAN COMMENTS:

1. Coordinate framing and connection details for 1st floor framing at connection to basement bearing walls. The proposed details are not appropriate since the span of the floor joists exceeds the prescriptive limit of 20-feet. When prescriptive limits can not be meant, an engineered design is required. Review, coordinate and clarify design. IRC Section R106.1.1, R301.1.3, R606.10

2. Detail 4 on sheet 5 shall be revised to be in accord with the wood joist floor that is proposed over the basement area. See foregoing comment.

3. Provide framing details for the 10x10-feet basement room off of the main basement. R106.1.1
PLUMBING PLAN COMMENTS

1. The proposed design for the water meter is not within the prescriptive limits of the IRC since the developed length is over 500-feet, the elevation differential from the public water service to the highest water tap in the building and other design parameters have not been sufficiently made known on the drawing. When prescriptive limits are exceeded an engineered design is required. Review and clarify. P2903.7

Sincerely,

BROWN & ASSOCIATES



Michael J. Brown, C.B.O. President
MB:ns

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/09/2006 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/09/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed