Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM05127
Parcel: 12907006U

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T05CM05127
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/13/2005 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Plants not listed on the Drought Tolerant Plant List may be used as follows per LUC 3.7.2.2.C:

· Used in an oasis area and if the plants are grouped in separately programmed irrigation areas according to their water requirements

· Oasis area equal to, but not more than, two and one-half (2.5) percent of the site.

· The oasis is placed on the site near main buildings or assembly areas where pedestrian activities are designed to occur or in an active use area per DS 2-06.3.2.B

· The oasis is located in an area of relatively low evaporation potential from wind and heat per DS 2-06.3.2.B.

· Revise landscapes plan(s) to include plants not listed on the Drought Tolerant Plant List in an oasis area and provide oasis calculations or choose appropriate plant materials.

· Plants indicted on planting plan not listed are Jacaranda mimosifolia, Chiltalpa tashkinensis, Ulmus parvifolia, Plumbago (all species), Callstemon "Little John", and Dietes bicolor. (Turf shall be included in oasis calculations)

2. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential zoned properties to the north per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

3. A 6' wall is required to screen all loading zones from adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Remove reference to optional CMU wall indicated in Keynote #15 on Sheet C1.2.

4. Include the locations, size and type of screens on landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.3

5. Additional comments may apply
10/13/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
10/14/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/03/2005 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens FOR: David Rivera
Senior Planner Principal Planner

PROJECT:T05CM05127
1435 E. 36th St.
Park Villas Casitas
Site Plan

Transmittal date: 1st Review 11-03-05

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. The proposed site plan indicating a 5 acre parcel appears to have been recently split from a larger parcel. Provide documentation indicating the Zoning division of Development Services has approved the lot split.

2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.2 Provide the address and legal description on the first page of the site plan.

3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.4 On the location map indicate the township, range, section, north arrow and scale.

4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.5 Provide the lot dimensions and bearings for all lot lines. Missing on all sides except the west property line.

5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6 Provide the use of each individual building and the square footage of each individual building being proposed.

6. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7 Provide dimensions for distances between buildings and required zoning setback distances.

Zoning acknowledges the letter from Wayne Bogden regarding averaging the setbacks for the structure at the northeast section of the property. Provide dimensions from the varying faces of the structure in order to verify the minimum 12'6" requirement. Plus or minus dimensions as indicated on the plan are not allowed.

The dimensions indicated for the setbacks for the structure located at the southeast potion of the property along the east property line appear to be incorrect. The north dimension is smaller than the south dimension. The building appears to be further from the property line at the northern portion of the building than at the south. Please clarify.

7. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7 & DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 & .2 The parking spaces indicated will require wheel stops or barriers to prevent overhanging of sidewalk areas unless there is clearly indicated that a min. 6'-6" wide sidewalk is provided in front of the parking spaces. If wheel stops are used it is to be located two and one half feet from the front of the parking space.

8. Per DS 202.2.1.10 & .19 Thirty Sixth Street is on the Major Streets and Route plan (MS&R) with a future right of way width of 100'. Clearly indicate the future right of way location and future curb location with dimensions from the property line. Future sight visibility triangles are also required, see engineering comments.

9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11 The use of an optional Right of Way & Solid Waste plan as indicated on sheet C1.1 is not allowed. Please remove optional detail as well as alternate bid information for parking spaces from notes on page C1.1. If at a later date it is decided to change the layout a revision can be resubmitted through Development Services.

The extension of 34th St. into the project will require sidewalks on both sides of the street connecting to the pedestrian circulation of the new project. See engineering comments.

10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12 A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to the PAAL on the side where buildings are located. See DS 2-08.4.1.B and Figure 1. This will require sidewalks to be installed between all buildings and the PAAL. These sidewalks must be connected to the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street as well as all areas of the development. See DS 2-08.4.1.D.

Side walks are required adjacent to any parking spaces accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. See DS 2-08.4.1.C

The sidewalk indicated at the northwest corner of the property at the loading zone must provide pedestrian circulation around the loading zone. See DS 2-08.4.1.F

The indicated handicap ramp located east of the north most loading zone must either be removed or a crosswalk indicated to the northern sidewalk with a handicap ramp at that sidewalk.

Pedestrian circulation for the west half of the project does not provide access to 36th St. Clearly indicate crosswalks or sidewalks connecting the pedestrian circulation path that meet this requirement.

11. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide location, type, size, and height of proposed freestanding signage including billboards.

12. Per DS 2-02.2.1.14 Provide the dimensions for the loading zone located near building D1. Clearly indicate maneuverability for this loading zone.

13. Per DS 2-02.2.1.20 If applicable, provide location of all easements of record on the plan together with recording docket and page.

14. Per DS 2-02.2.1.25 Zoning acknowledges the provided electrical plan indicating the location of site lighting. Please provide the location of site lighting on the site plan in order to be able to review the plan for conflicts between site lighting and pedestrian circulation, sidewalks, etc.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000.
11/04/2005 TERRY STEVENS ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied see zoning comments
11/28/2005 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Marc Frost, RA, Poster Frost Associates, Inc.
SUBJECT: Park Villa Casitas, Site Plan Review
LOCATION: 1435 E 36TH ST, T14S R14E Section 19, Ward 5
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T05CM05127

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department reviewed the Site Plan submittal and does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Site Plan purposes only. Address the following comments for resubmittal.

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:
1) In Section iii, the imperviousness is stated as 15%. The existing imperviousness needs to be based on existing houses or other impervious structures at the site, which may include existing concrete slab, and storage sheds. It may not include stockpiling of construction materials or other temporary impervious structures.
i) Provide justification of 15% impervious figure based on existing conditions, or revise statement on page 10.
ii) Update the affected existing conditions hydrologic data sheets.
2) Revise threshold retention volume calculations to reflect Table 4.3 runoff coefficients. Clarify reference to "Table 3.1".
3) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J: Drainage Report shall provide details and calculations for a sediment trap or other sediment control device for basins.
4) DS Sec.10-01: Design for basins needs clarification. Explain outlet structure wall in report. This feature does not meet the natural look for basin designs. Provide solution for outlet that follows the guidelines listed in the Detention/Retention Manual.
5) Clarify scupper calculation sheet. Explain depths of scupper with a detail.
6) The soils in this area are D soils. Discuss impact to basin design for this project.

SITE AND GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:
7) DS Sec.10-01: Design for basins needs clarification. Address the following comments on sheet C2.2:
a) Provide existing and proposed spot elevations around perimeter of basin areas.
b) Show minimum 1% flow grade at bottom of basin areas to show positive drainage toward outlet bleed pipe and to reduce potential for ponding problems.
8) DS Sec.2-02: Explain/provide full parcel boundary information of sheet C1.1.
9) Add building numbers to sheet C2.2.
10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Show limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation on C2.2.
11) Show roof drainage directions on sheet C2.2.
12) Sidewalk shall be provided along west entrance area. Show on sheets C1.1, C1.3, and C2.2.
13) Show all size and locations for scuppers on sheet C2.2, including at drainage inlet adjacent to southwest building.
14) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: A Geotechnical Evaluation was submitted for review. Address the following comments:
a) Provide any recommendation for setbacks from building to basins.
b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and specifically, state whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development in the area that was used for fire training. Provide any geotechnical recommendations.
c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes.
d) Provide minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales
15) Revise street/parking/drive area sections to reflect page 8 of the Geotechnical Evaluation for pavement design which indicates a minimum or 2"AC/7"BC or 2.5"AC/5"BC.
16) Add reference to the soils report in a general grading note and include any associated addenda for Western Technologies Inc. Geotechnical Evaluation.
17) DS Sec.11-01.14.2&3: On planview sheet C2.2, label dimension of minimum setback from demarcation of ponding limits to edge of building footprint from the basin areas. This dimension should be at an acceptable distance per geotechnical recommendations.
18) There are depictions of drainage outlets from the PAAL areas into landscaped areas around the proposed building structures. Ponding from drainage areas should be minimized near foundations. Provide assessment of plans by the geotechnical engineer with recommendations of drainage setbacks from structures. Provide dimensions between swales and building structures on sheet C2.2.
19) DS Sec.10-01.4.3: Where human activity zones are located in basin areas, 8:1(H:V) side slopes are needed at location of pedestrian access, and shall not conflict with inlets to the basins. Label grades for side slopes in drainage basin areas.
20) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Delineate access to basin areas on sheet C2.2 (minimum ramp size is 15 feet wide at 15% slope. Show that no proposed vegetation will block access on sheet L1.2.
21) Provide dimensions for basin areas for inspection purposes.
22) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.33. Show location of existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site boundaries on sheets C1.1 and C2.2.
23) PC/COT Stnd Det.207: Provide 12% grade on ramp for curb access on sheet C1.6.
24) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. Show and label also the utility easements listed in Title Report. Acknowledge that if any easements are relocated, not in use, or proposed for abandonment, then the documentation of the vacation / abandonment / relocation shall be submitted. Any blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status.
25) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Remove grid lines at H/C ramps on planviews and provide notation, legend symbol, or a detail for the curb access ramps with notation to provide truncated domes per ADAAG. This is an update to COT standard detail 207.
26) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Solid Waste Pick-up Discussion: An optional right-of-way is proposed for solid waste pick-up. The alternate onsite pick-up scenario has maneuverability issues and may impose more of a safety risk to a project with senior citizens and high pedestrian traffic. The option for the off-site pick-up appears to provide sufficient maneuverability, lessen the safety risks, and thus would be an acceptable option. Address the following solid waste pick-up comments:
a) DS Sec.6-01.4.2.C: State in response letter and clarify on plans whether detail shown on C1.4 will be built.
b) DS Sec.6-01.10.Fig.2: Submit copy of documentation from Solid Waste Department of Environmental Services (contact: John Clark) accepting solid waste pick-up access, maneuverability and details as shown on most recent plans.
c) DS Sec.6-01.10.Fig.2: There is a required 10'x10' clear area for each bin in the refuse enclosure which relates to the rear bollards. Revise detail 11 on C1.5 to reflect 10-ft minimum between rear bollards and back of enclosure gate.
d) DS Sec.6-01.4.2.C: Spacing for bollards are acceptable. However, add notation for reference to PC/COT Stnd Detail 106 for bollards on sheet C1.5.
27) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Dimension all curb radii on planview sheet C2.2.
28) For detail D/C2.3, add filter fabric to rip rap slope.
29) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Label dimensions of existing and future sight visibility triangles on sheets C1.1, C1.3, C2.2, and L1.2.
30) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.17. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities in table on sheet C2.2.
31) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.23: Address the following topographical comments:
a) On sheet C2.2, label and show local benchmark for basis of elevation.
b) On sheet C2.2, provide datum for basis of elevation.
c) On sheet C2.2, label and show monuments that bound the basis of bearing.
32) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: For sheet C2.2, provide a cross section of 36th Street right-of-way and frontage of project, showing existing and future MS&R right-of-way dimensions.
33) For sheet C2.2, , dimension existing sidewalk along 36th street; this may need to be constructed as 6-ft wide sidewalk for MS&R requirements.
34) The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall meet the minimum requirements of the Construction General Permit. Revise the SWPPP to address all of the following comments.
a) Provide list of operators with signatures.
b) Provide copy of NOI.
c) Label and show on exhibit, the receiving waters.
d) Provide discussion of what practices may be used for dust control practices for this site.
e) Show additional stabilized entrances if needed.
f) Provide the activities record and stabilized sequence lists. There should be a list of the sequence of events that begins with stabilization items, and proceeds to earthwork and grading activities, then ends with removal of control measures.
g) Add a note to sheet C2.6 stating that the operator shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours:
i) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1)
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505
h) Add a note to the grading plan and SWPP that a pre-construction meeting is required as well as SWPP inspection that includes some of the following information: Call for Pre-construction meeting. For a DSD Engineering Inspection, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html
i) Show location for concrete washout areas on plan view.
35) Explain how maintenance for the common areas including the drainage facilities will be provided.

Address the comments prior to resubmittal. Submit three copies of the site/grading plan, four copies of the SWPPP, two bound copies of the geotechnical report, the revised drainage report, and a response letter. If you would like to set up a meeting or if you have questions, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/23/2005 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/23/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed