Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM05083
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/13/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | FIRE HYDRANT REQUIRED. INDICATE LOCATION OF NEW FIRE HYDRANT ON PLAN. |
10/13/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Correct the Genus given in Zizyphus warnockii var. kearneyana. This plant may actually be Condalia warnockii var. kearneyana. Revise the NPPO Salvage and Mitigation Report, the Landscape Mitigation Plan and NPP Worksheet as necessary to reflect the correct name. 2. Label the blue circles (as to the type of mitigation plant) on the Landscape Mitigation Plan. |
10/13/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit a separate landscape plan per DS 2-07.0. to verify that entire site meets current minimum requirements. DS 2-02.2.1.C 2. The parking lot must be screened from adjacent residentially-zoned properties with a 5-foot masonry wall per LUC 3.7.3.7.A.1. Table 3.7.2-I 3. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof, and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. 4. The landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. |
10/13/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
10/13/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. An approved lot split and lot reconfiguration is required prior to permit approval. Provide copies of all approved lot split documents including survey drawings and legal descriptions. The lot split documents and drawings shall include information on how the residual portion of parcel 118-20-020A has been combined with the larger Fry's shopping center parcel to evidence that no more than 3 new lots have been created from this previously unsubdivided property. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Add the legal descriptions for each of the three individual lots. Add the correct addresses to the site plan. Include the ingress-egress/utility easement as part of the legal descriptions. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 & 3 3. Show vehicle and pedestrian access clearly to demonstrate how required connections are made to 1st Avenue and that the width of these vehicle and pedestrian connections meet code all the way to 1st Ave. Indicate with a note on sheet G 1.2, or on a separate drawing, that the 4' sidewalk continues to connect with 1st Ave. A DSMR may be required if connections are not made to the 1st Ave. right-of-way. If approval of a DSMR is sought add a note stating the case number, date of approval, what the DSMR was approved for, and any conditions imposed. DS 2-08.4.1 4. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") in size. Revise all text (parking space dimensions, easement dimesnions, etc.) that does not meet this minimum standard. 5. Add the adjacent zoning to the east, west, and south of the subject property. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 6. All easements must be clearly delineated on the drawing and all recordation information must be included on the drawing. Include the full dimensions and docket and page (dkt 12636, pg 81-107 ?) for the access and utility easement located in the north part of the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 7. Dimension the backup spur at the east end of the parking lot and dimension the distance between the end of the backup spur and the existing wood fence along the east property line. The minimum required distance is 3 feet for both of these dimensions. DS 3-05.2.2.D 8. On the eleveation drawings, specify the maximum building height, on all sides of the structure, above design grade elevation rather than finished floor elevation. Building setbacks cannot be verified until all exterior building wall heights are provided on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 LUC 3.2.6.4 9. Add the perimeter yard building setback dimensions to the east and west property lines for all proposed lots/duplexes. DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 10. Provide a landscape plan with information required in DS 2-07. DS 2-02.2.2.C |
10/17/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: David Blair DATE: October 17, 2005 FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE Engineering Division SUBJECT: 4084 N. 1st Avenue Site plan T05CM05083 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. The site plan shall be drawn at a standard engineering scale no larger than 1"=60'on a sheet(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1 The site plan scale on sheet 1 (1"=250) is fine, but the scale on sheet 2 should be labeled with a scale equal to or less than 1"=60". 3. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Show locations and boundaries of all egress-ingress easements. 4. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). DS 2-05.2.3.E 5. Please provide lot dimensions and bearings. Please include Basis of Bearing on the cover sheet. 6. Verify or illustrate how this project will tie into the existing Ingress-Egress easements. 7. Please label all bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 8. If applicable, fully dimension loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 9. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. 10. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 11. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 12. If applicable, please show dimensioned right-of-way information, or show all property limits of adjacent lots associated with the various recordation information illustrated on the site plan per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 13. If applicable all easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 14. If applicable dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 15. Update legend to include all missing items; i.e. the line work for the project boundary. 16. Spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 17. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 19. The proposed roof drainage patterns must be conveyed under the sidewalks. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 21. Grading Plan. A grading plan may be required if the earthwork exceeds 50 Cubic Yards. Generally, the grading plans may be submitted for review upon approval of the tentative plat. Should the applicant wish, the grading plan can be submitted after the second resubmittal of the site plan; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is in conformance with an approved site plan. D.S. 2-03.5.2 Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1191 Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 0000 O. Street Address |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
10/18/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |