Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T05CM05083
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Fire hydrant required. Submit approved COT Water Plan.(Fire hydrant cannot be supplied from 2-inch water main.] 2. Minimum 20-ft. radii required at turnaround. 3. Indicate that entire length of access drive is paved. |
| 10/31/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The plan labeled as "Landscape Plan" does not appear to show all proposed landscaping and is inconsistent with the site plan provided. Submit a landscape plan with information specified in DS 2-07. 2) Per table 3.7.2-I, a landscape border and a five-foot high wall is required for landscaping and screening of the proposed multifamily use and parking lot where adjacent uses are residential. Dimension all landscape borders on the Landscape Plan. A minimum 4-foot wide planter area is required adjacent to the PAAL along the north property line and the northernmost portion of the east property line. Ten foot landscape borders are required along the east and south property lines where the vehicle use area is not located next to the property line. 3) The precise location of the 5-foot wall is unclear on the plan. Is the wall located off of the property as shown on the plan? Show the exact location of the 5-foot screen wall on the landscape plan and on the detail D/G 2.0. For screening of the parking lot from the residential property to the south, the screen wall adjoining and running between the proposed duplexes must continue to the east lot line of parcel "C" and to the west lot line of parcel "A". 4) Landscape borders along parking lots where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. Provide protection for interior landscape border along the north and a portion of the east property lines. 5) Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage on the Landscape Plan per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g |
| 11/01/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | See comments in Landscape folder. |
| 11/01/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1) On sheet G 1.2, indicate with a legend symbol or labels that the access drive is paved all the way to First Avenue. 2) It is unclear where the proposed 5-foot Royce wall is located relative to the 2-foot retaining wall and existing wood fence. Is the wood fence to be removed. If so, label as such on the plan. Show the location of the 5-foot wall on the wall detail (D) on sheet G 2.0. Also, indicate the property line location relative to the wall(s) on this detail. |
| 11/10/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: David Blair DATE: November 10, 2005 FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE Engineering Division SUBJECT: 4084 N. 1st Avenue Site plan T05CM05083 (Second Review) T13S, R14E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. The site plan shall be drawn at a standard engineering scale no larger than 1"=60'on a sheet(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1 Sheets G1.1 and G1.2 do not scale off correctly. Please modify drawing so that it scales at a standard engineering scale. 3. Place a copy of the Basis of Bearing information (located on sheets G1.1 & G1.2) onto the cover sheet. 4. In addition to the individual lots please list-estimated cut & fill quantities for the entire site per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Comment 21 from the previous comment may still apply. "21. Grading Plan. A grading plan may be required if the earthwork exceeds 50 Cubic Yards. Generally, the grading plans may be submitted for review upon approval of the tentative plat. Should the applicant wish, the grading plan could be submitted after the second resubmittal of the site plan; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is in conformance with an approved site plan. D.S. 2-03.5.2 Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". 5. If the cut and fill quantities exceed 50 CY a grading permit must applied for in order to conduct a review for a grading plan. If applicable, please apply for the grading permit prior to submitting the grading plan for review. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1191 Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 0000 O. Street Address |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/10/2005 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |