Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM05050
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/07/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0. |
| 10/07/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The site plan must be accompanied by a landscape plan with information specified in Development Standard 2-07.0. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans per DS 2-02.2.1.C. Submit a revised landscape plan with proposed expansions and landscape requirements included. 2. A 10' interior landscape border is required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3. Show on landscape plan how interior landscape border will comply with minimum requirements per LUC 3.7.2.4. One canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of the interior landscape border. 4. The planting plan and layout will include, sizes, and common and scientific name(s) of new and existing vegetation per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 5. A 5' wall to screen new vehicle use area from adjacent residential zoned property is required per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 6. A 6' wall is required per LUC Table 3.7.2-I to screen refuse storage from adjacent residential property. 7. Add note to plan: All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. 8. Include irrigation design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A&B 9. Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0. 10. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/28/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: David Rivera Planner Technician Principal Planner PROJECT: T05CM05050 311 West Pastime Road Expansion of apartment complex TRANSMITTAL: COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. The plan submitted is for an expansion of an existing apartment complex in the R-2 zone. This expansion requires full code compliance with the current Land Use Code. The Development Designator is "K" for multifamily use. LUC Sec 2.3.5.2.A.2 & LUC Sec 3.2.3.1.C 2. Provide a unaltered copy of the last stamped approved site plan. In addition, remove all approval stamps from the current submittal. The current submittal has not been approved. 3. Identify the square footage of each building on the plan. In the "Project Description" it states: "New duplex will match existing duplex 2 - bedroom single story with parapet walls." If the existing duplex units have been remodeled from one-bedroom units to two bedroom units, please provide the approved plans for the remodel. If this is incorrect please revise the note to reflect what has been done and what is actually being proposed. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 4. Provide a fully dimensioned layout detail for bicycle parking. Include materials for lighting, paving and security. Specify the type of bicycle rack and the number of bicycles it supports. Also provide the locations and type of directional signage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 DS 2-09 5. Identify the location, type size, and height of any existing or proposed freestanding signage. Also identify any billboard on, or adjacent to, the site. DS 2-02.2.1.13 6. Clearly depict, and dimension, easements of record on the site plan. Identify the use along with the docket and page recording information. Also delineate with dimensions and uses any proposed easements. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 7. Identify all existing and proposed freestanding lighting on the site plan. Depict the lighting layout and identify the type on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A 8. Identify the zoning of the adjacent parcels on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 9. A five-foot (5') pedestrian refuge is required between all structures and all vehicle use areas. This pedestrian refuge must have a sidewalk that is four feet (4') wide and is setback one foot (1') from the parking area access lane (PAAL). The pedestrian refuge must be accessible and provide safe and complete pedestrian circulation from all structures and the street. The pedestrian refuge areas must be provide between the existing buildings and the parking area and driveway, and it also must be provided between the proposed building and the driveway and parking areas. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 DS 3-04.2.2.B.1 10. The minimum width for a two-way PAAL is twenty-four feet (24'). The PAAL width to the west of the two existing buildings and the proposed building is inadequate. Clearly delineate the existing and proposed driveway and parking areas. Also provide dimensions for the parking spaces and the parking bumpers DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 LUC Sec3.3.7.2 11. The minimum setback of two feet (2') must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, fence or other obstruction. Provide a two-foot (2') setback between the PAAL and the fence and property line along the east boundary of the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 12. For the site area calculations list the square footage of each structure on the site plan and provide the square footage of the vehicle use area. Then calculate the total use and the percentage of coverage. DS 2-02.2.A.3 13. Revise the parking calculation to reflect the actual units existing and the units proposed. Provide the calculations based on the actual number of bedrooms in each existing and proposed unit. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4 LUC Sec 3.3.4 14. Two (2) Class 2 bicycle-parking spaces are required. Provide this information in the site data calculations along with the number of bicycle parking spaces provided. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4 LUC Sec 3.3.3.5 15. Conditions for which Board of Adjustment variances have been granted must be reapplied for whenever significant changes are proposed to the approved plan. Board of Adjustment variances are specific to the plan for which the variance was granted. Provide full information for all Board of Adjustment variances granted. Include the exceptions to the Land Use Code granted and the conditions imposed. Please go to the Land Use Code for the current standards concerning applications for variances. DS 2-02.2.1.A.38 LUC Sec 5.1.7.3 16. Additional comments may be required relative to changes provided on the plan and additional information provided. |
| 11/01/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Passed | Handicapped parking is not required with the configuration submitted. |
| 11/07/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The engineering division has no adverse comments that are relevant to the Board of Adjustment variance process. A complete review of the project will be completed for this project at a later date. Loren Makus, E.I.T Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division |
| 11/07/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 7, 2005 FROM: Jose E. Ortiz Engineering Division SUBJECT:SFR 311 W. Pastime Road; Tucson Arizona 85711 Site plan T05CM05050(1st Review) T13S, R13E,25 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 3. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 4. Per D.S. 6-01.2.2A three or more dwelling units will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection, and pickup areas. This is not being proposed in this development; therefore a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) may be required. Please provide a letter from John Clark of Solid Waste at 791-3175 to confirm that the solid waste collection proposal is acceptable and whether or not a DSMR is required. 5. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1191 Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1191 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/14/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/14/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |