Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - SITE
Permit Number - T05CM04911
Review Name: REVISION - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2007 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Can not find response to fire department comment date 6/5/2007 in your re-submittal letter, please clarify. |
| 08/14/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T05CM04911 (Revised) 44 E Broadway Blvd. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 16, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. While the overall building footprint has not changed the existing parking area at ground level is not considered floor area but it is an expansion of building area the sense that it is counter towards the floor area ratio. Revise the expansion note on sheet A2.01 to reflect that there is a 23% floor area expansion for the new retail. 2. It does not appear that the sight visibility triangle along the East Side of the Broadway driveway has been drawn in the correct location. Discuss this item with the Engineering reviewer. Revise the sight visibility triangle as required. Previous comment number 5: Draw all sight visibility triangles per development standards 3-01. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 Structures such as signs, refuse enclosures, or parking spaces may not be placed within sight visibility triangles. Redesign of the triangles will be necessary to ensure that the items mentioned above do not interfere with sight visibility. See additional comments by the Engineering reviewer. 3. It is acknowledged that a modified loading is proposed for the retail use and will be provided on the West Side parking lot. The modified loading zone size must be approved through a Board of Adjustment variance or if applicable through the MDR process. Previous comment number 6: Loading zones must be located on site. It is acknowledged that an MDR is to be processed to allow the loading space on street. Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. DS 2-02.2.1.A.14 4. The CDRC case number was not listed on the plan as requested. Please the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block. Previous comment number 9: List the case applicable case number for the condominium development. The case number should be listed in the lower right corner next to the title block. DS 2-02.2.1A.29 5. While the refuse container type, size, and location is an Engineering and Environmental Services review responsibility, Zoning will review the location to ensure that LUC or zoning requirements are not affected. In this case the approach to the refuse container is proposed over one of the parking spaces. This parking space becomes unusable and cannot be counted towards the number of parking spaces provided. The parking space delineation must be removed from the drawing and the parking calculation revised accordingly. See engineering comments for more information. Previous comment number 11: See engineering comments related to the type of refuse container required and the proposed location and access criteria. DS 2-02.2.1.A.32 7. The vehicle parking calculation needs to be revised. After discussion with Craig Gross with regards to the mixed-use allowance to reduce the number of spaces the mixed-use calculation cannot be used because the parking requirements in Downtown Redevelopment District are already an exception to the parking ratios in 3.3.0. Remove the mixed-use information and revise the vehicle and bicycle parking calculation accordingly. In addition, if an MDR is to be requested for the parking all information related to the Jackson Street parking must be removed form reference notes and the aerial. If the Jackson Street parking lot is to be considered as part of this development a site plan must be submitted for review. The site plan must depict the proposed 30 parking spaces for the residential use. In addition to the site plan a letter of non-conforming status from the Zoning Administrator must be included. Previous comment number 13: Please ensure that all land use code calculations related to vehicle and bicycle parking, loading zones, floor area ratio and lot coverage are revised based on changes made to the plan. DS 2-02.2.2.A.1 through .6. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T05cm04911REV2.doc |
| 08/16/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/21/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 08/28/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 28, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM04911 PROJECT NAME: Lofts and Retail PROJECT ADDRESS: 44 East Broadway Blvd. PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps or at any area where the sidewalk is flush with the asphalt. It is acknowledge a general note has been provided on the plan regarding truncated domes. The site plan will be utilitized as a construction document (rather than a grading plan) for the site infrastructure and also utilized by the Engineering Division Inspectors for inspection purposes. The site plan must call out the truncated domes at all required locations within the ROW. Revise appropriately. DS 2-02.A.2.1.12 ICC/ANSI A117. 1-2003 Sec. 406.13 The above comment is from the previous review and will continue to be made until an alternative solution is approved. Per a meeting on 8.23.07 recommendations were made to seek advisement from the Department of Transportation regarding the design of the ramp transitions for the ROW. This comment will continue to be made once this office receives in writing from the Department of Transportation on the design of the ramp transitions for the ROW. 2. Per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG) for ingress/egress to a local street 18' curb returns and for arterial roads a 25' curb returns are required. Indicate 18' curb returns for the ingress/egresses to Jackson Street and 25' curb returns for Broadway Blvd. This office acknowledges this project is not a typical commercial/residential project and may not be able to meet code requirements. For the ingress/egress design onto the public roads it is recommended to contact Jose Ortiz from Traffic Engineering with the Department of Transportation at 837.6730. If an alternative solution is accepted by Traffic Engineering provide in writing the approved alternative solution. TMAG was adopted on March 17, 2003 by Mayor and Council. The above comment is from the previous review and will continue to be made until an alternative solution is approved. Per a meeting on 8.23.07 recommendations were made to seek advisement from the Department of Transportation regarding the above comment. This comment will continue to be made once this office receives approval in writing for the alternative solution to the above referenced guideline. |
| 08/29/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/04/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/04/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |