Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM04698
Parcel: 106030150

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T05CM04698
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/16/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire sprinklers required per 2003 IBC 903.2.7
09/26/2005 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
09/28/2005 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate the duct and HVAC equipment layout with the architectural background.
2. Clarify the route of the exhaust duct for the range hood for unit "A". Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2000.
3. Provide information to show that the closet installation of the clothes dryer (unit "A") conforms to Section 504.5, IMC 2000.
4. Provide information to show that the proposed size of the dryer exhaust duct is approved for use by the dryer manufacturer. Reference Section 504.6, IMC 2000.
09/28/2005 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The total flow for the private sewage collection system for this project is in excess of 3000 gallons per day. The design for the system must be submitted to the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for their approval prior to obtaining a permit for constructing the sewage collection system from the City of Tucson. Reference A. R. S. 49-104 (B) (13).
2. The trap and trap arm for a lavatory may not be increased more than one size larger than the minimum trap size shown in Table 7-3. Reference Section 1003.3, UPC 1994.
3. Provide the listing for the two-way cleanout fitting called out in detail 2/P1.1. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
4. Coordinate the plumbing layout with the architectural background - the water closet is not normally located in the bathtub.
10/11/2005 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
10/12/2005 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/18/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied 1. A copy of the stamped approved site plan, landscape plan, and NPPO plan shall be inserted into each building plan set. One stamped approve set was submitted for this building plan review.

2. Proposed building 3 on the site plan shows a breezeway and the floor plan on sheet A1.1 does not. Revise one or the other for consistency.

3. Building heights provided on the elevation drawings are higher than the building heights proposed on the site plan. For example, on the approved site plan, building 3 is labeled as having a 13'6" height to the top of the structure. The east elevation on sheet A2.2 has a building height well over 14 feet from design grade measured to the top of the parapet wall. Re-check all building wall heights shown in the elevation drawings and provide dimensions from design grade to the highest point of the exterior building wall (top of parapet wall). If the proposed building heights require a greater building setback than what is shown on the approved site plan, a revised site plan will be required and Design Development Option approval will be required for the insufficient interior perimeter yard/s.
10/20/2005 RAUL PALMA BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 10-24/05

1) Comply to F.D. comments.
2) Provide smoke detectors in bedrooms as per section
907.2.10.1.2. of the 2003 IBC.
3) Specify what TG means in the window schedule. If tempered glazing then clarify.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/26/2005 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/26/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed