Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM04388
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/30/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/30/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/19/2005 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T05CM04388 2450 E. Fort Lowell Road New Columbarium & Memorial Garden Site Plan 1st Review Transmittal date: September 21, 2005 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed in accordance with requirements of the Development Standards (DS), Land Use Code (LUC), American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and International Building Code (IBC) 2003. 2. As requested, the last approved site plan for the existing religious use was included in the plan submittal. Unfortunately, this site plan is not legible enough to determine the conditions (i.e. building shapes, dimensions, parking areas) surrounding the proposed location of the columbarium and memorial gardens. Please submit a legible copy of the last approved site plan, clearly identifying the proposed location of the columbarium and memorial gardens. 3. The site plan submitted for this project (sheet A1) does not contain any dimensions, setbacks, future curb and right of way dimensions, nor notations of any existing site conditions that may be transformed or affected (i.e. parking, buildings, etc.), or calculations such as lot coverage. It was also noted the submitted site plan only shows the project area and a small area of the existing site. This plan will only be accepted if the above information is provided. 4. It was noted in this review that the columbarium is to be positioned in an area of the site that is considered a front street yard. Per the R-2 zoning of this site, under LUC Section 3.2.5.3.C, a detached accessory structure is not allowed in the buildable area extending the full width of the lot between the principal structure and the front street lot line. The alternatives are to either move the structure south to be in line with the front face of the building, attach the structure to the existing church, or obtain a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Please see comment 6 for further information on obtaining Board of Adjustment variance comments. 5. Please note, further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the information provided on the resubmittal. 6. To obtain official review comments referring this project to the Board of Adjustment, all revisions needed to the site plan must be addressed first. Once revisions are approved, staff can issue official referral comments to the applicant to proceed with the Board of Adjustment variance process. 7. Should you have any questions on this review, please contact me via email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/20/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Burns & Wald Hopkins Architects DATE: September 21, 2005 FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE Engineering Division SUBJECT: 2450 E FORT LOWELL RD Site plan T05CM04388 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 32 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report. The Site Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Some of the following comments call out for information that may be placed somewhere else in the plan set, but this information needs to be placed on the site plan as well. 3. Please provide North arrow and scale per D.S. 2-02.2.1. 4. Please provide property description and address of the site per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 5. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 6. If applicable, provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. 7. If applicable, please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 8. Please provide additional drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16 to illustrate how roof drainage on the east portion of the project will flow to the basins to prevent nuisance ponding. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 11. If applicable, all easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. In addition provide dimensions to the proposed project. 13. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 14. List the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 15. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 16. Grading Plan. A grading plan may be required if the earthwork exceeds 50 Cubic Yards. Generally, the grading plans may be submitted for review upon approval of the tentative plat. Should the applicant wish, the grading plan can be submitted after the second resubmittal of the site plan; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is in conformance with an approved site plan. D.S. 2-03.5.2 17. Please provide an approved Drainage Report/Drainage Statement as reference to assist in the review of the Detention Basins. 18. See Sheet A1.0 and C1.1 for additional red line comments. 19. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. A meeting may be warranted to coordinate and clarify any questions that may arise from these review comments. Please feel free to contact me at 791-5550 x1191 Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov to discuss these review comments and/or to setup a meeting regarding the comments. Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 0000 O. Street Address |
| 09/21/2005 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning review comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/27/2005 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/27/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |