Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM04340
Parcel: 12204043A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T05CM04340
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/17/2005 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Landscape plan indicates a Metal Site Wall (Keynote #3) the required screen for the vehicle use area is a 5' masonry wall per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise landscape plan to match site plan as necessary.

2. All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 2-16.0. Remove Keynote #16 all plant material requires approval per LUC 3.7.2.2.A

3. Upon review of the photographs included with the application for exception, Protected Native Plants are located on site a NPPO plan per DS 2-15.0 must be submitted. A complete list of protected plants can be found @ http://www.tucsonaz.gov/planning/codes/luc/lucweb/Art3div8.html#TopOfPage LUC 3.8.5
10/17/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Upon review of the photographs included with the application for exception, Protected Native Plants are located on site a NPPO plan per DS 2-15.0 must be submitted. A complete list of protected plants can be found @ http://www.tucsonaz.gov/planning/codes/luc/lucweb/Art3div8.html#TopOfPage LUC 3.8.5
11/01/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Approved
11/01/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Per the Zoning Administration office, detached accessory structures must be structurally attached to the principal dwelling and conform to building code requirements for attached structures. Christy Foreman, structural reviewer for DSD has looked at the proposed building plans and has determined that the drawing and details provided do not show how the shade structure will be attached to the building. Once the shade structure is deemed "structurally attached to the building" by Stantec or a DSD structural reviewer, Zoning may then approve the site plan.
Previous comment: Per LUC Sec. 3.2.5.3, in a residential zone, detached accessory structures (i.e. carport) are not allowed in the buildable area extending the full width of the lot between the principal structure and the front street lot line. A variance would be required to allow as shown on the plan. For information regarding the variance process please contact Russlyn Wells at 791-5550 ext. 1134. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6)


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person.
11/06/2005 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: November 6, 2005
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM04340
PROJECT NAME: Rinaldi Lofts
PROJECT ADDRESS: 4551 East Pima Street
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN

1. The near side and far side SVT is shown with a length of 345'. This is not correct. The far side SVT length for a PAAL to a collector street is 110. The near side length is 265'. Revise accordingly. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10.

2. It appears that the roof drainage from unit 2 and 3 is being directed to the 8'6" sidewalk. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Revise the plan or clarify in the response letter.

3. It is acknowledged a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) has been submitted and approved. Provide the DSMR verbiage and application number (DSMR 05-26) on the site plan.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/09/2005 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/09/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed