Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM04322
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
900 S PANTANO PW

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T05CM04322
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/19/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
08/26/2005 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied See landscape comments.
08/26/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Revise all plans as necessary to demonstrate compliance with the following requirements:

1) Identify on the plans the native plant preservation methodology used to comply with the regulations. LUC 3.8.6.1

2) The Native Plant Preservation Plan shall affirm, by statement, conformance with the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law. LUC 3.8.4.5

3) If the inventory methodology is used a complete inventory per 2-15.3.0 is required. The inventory photo and inventory list is to include all protected plants.

4) If the set-aside methodology is used, the mitigation requirement is for a minimum of thirty (30) percent of the site to be set aside in perpetuity as NUOS area. The area(s) to be set aside are required to be
be platted and included in Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) as NUOS or similarly protected. LUC 3.8.6.4.B

5) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A

6) An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) is required if the set-aside methodology is chosen per Development Standard 1-07.0 and in conformance with Development Standard 2-15.3.5. The report shall be prepared for the entire site to determine the general viability, density, and variety of Protected Native Plants within areas on the site. The Report shall include an assessment of such areas of NUOS and shall prioritize the natural resource value of vegetated areas on the site in conformance with the intent and purpose of this Division. LUC 3.8.6.4.B

7) The Native Plant Preservation Plan indicates preserved-in-place plants in the route of the proposed bicycle path. Revise the plans to relocate the plants or accommodate the preservation of the protected plants. LUC 3.8.6.6.C

8) Boundaries of all set aside areas shall be clearly delineated on the site plan, development plan, landscape plan. LUC 3.8.6.4.D, DS 2-07.2.2.B.4

9) Show individual preserved protected plants, other than those in NUOS areas, on the landscape plans.
DS 2-07.2.2.A

10) Obtain approval from the City Engineer, Andrew Dinauer and the TDOT Landscape Architect, Gary Wittwer for landscaping and other improvements in the pantano Parkway right-of-way.

11) Proposed parking lots are required to be screened from adjacent streets. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

12) Proposed parking lots are required include landscape borders along the street frontage. LUC 3.7.2.4.A

13) Proposed parking lots are required to provide canopy trees in accordance LUC 3.7.2.3.A.

14) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site
storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of
all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire
vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B

15) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. LUC 3.7.2.7.

16) Identify any proposed phasing of the project. It appears that the memorial tree planting areas would be planted after initial construction of the linear park. DS 2-02.2.2.B
Phasing may also affect implementation of the native plant preservation plan, revise or clarify as necessary.
09/02/2005 RBABBIT1 LANDFILL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved
09/12/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS) were addressed.

1. List the project address. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.3)

2. List the height of all proposed buildings and structures on the site plan. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.6)

3. Provide an accessible pedestrian path from the disabled parking spaces to the multi-use path. Where necessary provide an accessible ramp. Provide a detail of the accessible parking space, access aisle, ramp, and parking sign. Refer to ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 for specifications. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12)

4. Provide a vehicle and bicycle parking calculation for the park. Refer to LUC 3.3.4 "Recreation" for vehicle and bicycle parking requirements. The number of vehicle parking spaces required and provided shall be included in the calculation. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4)

5. In the bicycle parking calculation, include the number and Class type required and provided. Provide a fully dimensioned detail of the bicycle parking facility and indicate on the site plan the location and number and class type provided. Refer to DS 2-09 for design criteria. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) (D.S. 2-02.2.A.4)

6. Dimension all new PAALs and standard vehicle parking spaces or note as "typical" if they are all the same size. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11)

7. Dimension "existing" and "future" right-of-way for Pantano Road, 22nd Street, and Golf Links Road on the applicable sheets. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19)


8. If applicable, all existing and proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, whether they are public or private, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20)

9. Label existing zoning of parcel and adjacent parcels. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28)


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180 or Daniel.Castro@tucsonaz.gov
An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person.
09/12/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning Review comments.
09/14/2005 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 09/16/2005,

1. Provide the project address on the cover sheet (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.3).
2. It does not appear that the proposed improvements are surveyable and tied into permanent monuments. Provide the required survey information including the basis of bearing and basis of elevation (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.5).
3. It appears that a drainage report is required for this project. Submit a report that addresses floodplain, erosion hazard setback, existing and proposed drainage, and proposed drainage structures. Please be advised that the proposed improvements shall not obstruct existing drainage (D.S.2-02.2.2.C.).
4. The provided cross-sections should show the existing and proposed bank protection, including the required toe down, on the Pantano Wash. Additionally, Clarify if the proposed pathway within the Pantano River bank will be part of a proposed bank protection.
5. If bank protection is proposed, specify the proposed material and provide the design calculations in the Drainage Report.
6. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height overhangs, canopies, and use (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.6). Please be advised that structures proposed to be installed in the regulatory floodplain and/or erosion hazard setback, will require compliance with the Floodplain Ordinance requirements including a floodplain use permit.
7. Off-street parking, including fully dimensioned layout, location, parking spaces' size and number, and typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces, together with access thereto (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.8).
8. Off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.9).
9. Points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (PAALs) (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.11).
10. Vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.12). Please be advised that this requirement includes all existing sidewalks.
11. Provide fully dimensioned maneuvering areas (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.14).
12. Provide the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.15).
13. Provide drainage patterns, proposed finish floor elevation(s), and finish grades D.S.2-02.2.1.A.16).
14. Provide the estimated cut and fill quantities (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.17).
15. It is not clear if the path connections to the existing streets will include wheelchair ramps. Proposed paths are treated as sidewalks and they should meet all applicable requirements of D.S. 3-01.2.8. Please be advised that per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207.
16. Dimension the right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.19).
17. All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.20).
18. Dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.21).
19. Provide refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.32).
20. Legends and symbols used in the preparation of the site plan shall be provided and in accordance with City of Tucson Drafting Standards (D.S.2-02.2.1.B).
21. The provided cross sections and profiles are for the Asphalt Multi-Use Path only. Provide detail cross sections for the Pedestrian Decomposed Granite Path and verify that both paths are ADA compliant.
22. With all the proposed slopes and cut and fill, prepare and submit a Geotechnical study to address compaction and slope treatment. Additionally, are retaining walls proposed for proposed cuts similar to the one shown in the cross sections at stations 136+00, 143+00 and 144+00 etc.
23. Considering the size of the proposed project, a SWPPP may be required.
24. Address the need for a 404 permit.
25. The preceding comments are for the 30% submittal. Additional comments may be offered when the more advanced plans are submitted.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/20/2005 GBONILL1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed