Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM04322
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
900 S PANTANO PW

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T05CM04322
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/03/2006 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/12/2006 HEATHER THRALL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied Please see zoning and ADA comments.
10/12/2006 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Senior Planner

PROJECT: T05CM04322
900 S. Pantano, New City of Tucson Linear Park
Commercial Site Plan, 3rd Review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 12, 2006

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) On sheet 1, under Development Regulations, please revise the zoning of the site to include RX-1 zoning next to the SR zoning stated (The project is zoned RX-1 in TRS 14 15 17)

2. For full review of Handicapped Accessibility requirements (ADA), please see Martin Dupont's review comments. Due to safety concerns, zoning staff is preliminarily advising of an issue on Page SD-5. The accessible route from the handicapped parking access aisle across the PAAL to the handicapped ramp is designed to require a handicapped parking space adjacent to back out over the crosswalk jeopardizing visibility of the crosswalk. Per DS 2-08.4.1.F, pedestrian refuge areas may not be located between any vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space.

3. Per DS 2-08.5.1.A, all sidewalks must be a minimum of 4' in width and installed to avoid any obstruction that decreases the required width. On Sheet SD-8, the 4' wide sidewalks are perpendicular to parking spaces - and these parking spaces can overhang into the sidewalk. Please provide a 6'6" wide sidewalk to allow a 2'6" vehicular overhang - OR- provide a wheel stop barrier within the parking spaces abutting sidewalks. The wheel stop must be contained within 2'6" of the front of the space.

4. On Sheet SD-6, ramadas are shown over picnic tables. Please advise the heights of the ramadas (list next to notes for comfort station on sheet 1).

5. Please see Engineering comments for parking in the right of way area. Preliminarily, zoning staff advises that on Sheet SD-1, parallel parking spaces are shown only 20' long. Per DS 3-05, a parallel parking space must be 23' in length.

HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T05CM04322 900 s pantano park 3rd.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan
10/18/2006 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond
10/18/2006 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 10/18/2006,

Drainage Report:

1. This submittal did not include a revised copy of the Drainage Report. Consequently a report review could not be conducted and the previous comment responses could not be verified. The following comments are the same comments that were made previously. Additionally, DSD staff has not received a copy of Mr. Leo Smith's (of Pima County) response/approval letter for his Drainage Report review.
2. Figure 8 does not appear to show the Pantano Wash 100-year floodplain as stated in Section 4.3 on page 10.
3. The scupper design calculation at Concentration Points 6A, 8A, 11A and 12A are not included in the report.
4. It does not appear that the report addresses the existing and proposed drainage culvert, RCP's and storm drains to verify the adequacy of their capacity.
5. It appears that the runoff from the proposed 30" RCP might flow past the existing culvert and completely enter the culvert. Address this issue.
6. Several of the pathway stations, on Figure 8, are not clear and hard to read. Use a larger font for the stations in order to facilitate comparing the information between the drainage exhibit and the site plan.
7. It is not clear if Concentration Point 8A will have a scupper or a curb opening. Clarify.
8. It does not appear that the proposed concrete channel along the new AC bike path, which connects the linear park bike path to Hearthstone Hills subdivision, is addressed in the Drainage Report.
9. It appears that the scupper opening width information in Table 4.2-1 does not completely match the information in the scupper calculations in Appendix B. Revise as necessary.

Geotechnical Report:

1. The Geotechnical Report was not included in this submittal nor the previous comments were responded to. We offer the same comments from the previous submittal.
2. It is not clear if the report proposes vegetation to stabilize slopes that are steeper than 3 to 1. The first paragraph in the Slopes Section, on page 12, makes a generic statement that "slopes steeper than 3 to one should be revegetated to help reduce surface erosion", which does not seem to be sufficient for slopes steeper than 3 to 1. Address this issue and revise as necessary.
3. Propose required setbacks from cut and fill slopes.

Site Plan:

1. It is still not clear where the proposed improvements are tied into a permanent monument for horizontal data. Provide the basis of bearing and the tie to the proposed AC path centerline. All proposed improvements shall be shown in a surveyable manner and tied into the basis of bearing as required by (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.5).
2. The cross-sections information provided on sheets C-1 through C-4 will have to verified in accordance with the approved Drainage Report.
3. Show on the Site and Civil Plans (not only the Landscape Plans) the bicycle parking, driveway dimensions, parking areas, including the layout, location, parking space dimensions and numbers, and typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces, together with access thereto (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.8), (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.9) and (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.11).
4. Show on the Site and Civil plans (not only the Landscape Plans) the fully dimensioned maneuvering areas (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.14).
5. Provide on the Site and Civil plans the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.15).
6. The Site Plan does not clearly specify to which standard the wheelchair ramps will be built and whether they will be installed with truncated domes.
7. Verify the presence of existing easements within the proposed improvement area. If easements are present, show them graphically including the recording docket and page reference (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.20).
8. Dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (D.S.2-02.2.1.A.21.
9. Complete the sheet number on Sheet C-6 for the 35 C.Y. riprap outlet, adjacent to Station 81+65.79. Correct all similar inadvertent omissions.
10. The Site Plan can not be approved until the 404 Permit has been obtained.
10/19/2006 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approv-Cond
11/03/2006 MARTY DUPONT ADA REVIEW Denied These plans have been reveiwed by the City of Tucson Office of Equal Opportunity Programs for compliance with Department of Justice 28 CFR Part 36 ADA Standards for Accessible Design revised July 1, 1994. These guidelines are available for download at ada.gov

1. Identify the accessible route on the plans. §4.3
2. All walks identified as part of the accessible route shall not have a running slope greater than 5% or it will be considered a ramp. Provide a passing space at intervals not to exceed 200' and free of protruding objects. §§§4.3.4, 4.3.7, 4.4
3. Walking surfaces to comply with section §4.5
4. Insure that tree limbs located in the accessible path allow 80" minimum headroom. §4.6.4
5. Demonstrate on the plans at the HC parking spaces and access aisles that the slope does not exceed 2% in any direction. §4.6.3
6. Specify accessible picnic tables. §§4.1.3(18), 4.32 & Fig. 45
7. Detail #1 on sheet SP-15. The change in ground surfaces shall comply with §4.5 for elevation.
8. Plan #1 on sheet SD-1. Provide access aisle at the parallel HC parking space. §4.6.3
9.Detail #2 on sheet D-3. Handrail diameter is called out as 1 5/8". Diameter shall be 1 1/4" to 1 1/2" and required on both sides of the steps. The maximum raius on the nosing is 1/2". Handrail to extend 12" minimum beyond the top riser and at least 12" plus the width of of one tread beyond the bottom riser. At the top the extension shall be parrallel with the floor or ground surface. At the bottom the handrail shall continue to slope for a distance of the width of one tread from the bottom riser; the remainder of the extension shall be horizontal. The extension shall not create a protruding object.
10. Detail #8 &#9 on sheet D-5. Change 4'-0' bottom of sign dimension to 7'-0". §4.6.4
11. Detail #13 on sheet D-5. The cable strung between the bollards is not cane detectable. §4.4, Fig. 8(c)
12. Detail #1 on sheet D-6. Truncated domes to be located in the depressed section of the sidewalk. Pedestrian area to vehicular area. §4.7..7
13. Detail #5 on sheet D-6. Change note #11 to read truncated domes. §4.7.7
14. Detail #3 on sheet D-7. Change tactile warning to truncated domes. §4.7.7
15. Drinking fountains and lavatory's are located in the accessible path of travel and are protruding objects, provide cane detectability. §4.4
16. Show mounting height of lavatory's. §4.19
17. Provide hi/lo drinking fountains and dimension mounting heights. §4.15
18. Dimension location of side & rear grab bars from side & rear walls. §4.17, Fig. 30
19. Toilet height is measured to the top of seat 17" to 19". §4.16.3
20. Show location and height of flush control. §4.16.5
21. Show location, type and mounting height of required accessible signage. §4.30
22. The 1'-6" dimension is absolute from finish of side wall to center of toilet. Delete the "MIN." §4.17, Fig. 30

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/16/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed
11/08/2006 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed