Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM04276
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/17/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens FOR: David Rivera Senior Planner Principal Planner PROJECT:T05CM04276 1315 W. Miracle Mile Commercial Storage Site Plan Transmittal date: 1st Review 9-17-05 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Per DS 2-02.2.1.6 Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use. The site plan indicates a future security office. This project is under LUC Sec. 2.5.4.2.H.1 Commercial Storage "31", subject to: 3.5.10.1. Sec. 3.5.10.1.B states that outdoor storage, when permitted, shall not be located in the street perimeter yard. If there is to be no building at this time then the entire site becomes street perimeter yard and no storage is allowed for the entire site. If the indicated security office is to become part of this project at this time then storage would not be allowed anywhere from the front of the structure to the front property line across the entire lot parallel to the street. 2. Per DS 2-02.2.1.7 Dimensions are missing for the following: 1. The required building setbacks as per LUC Sec3.2.6.5. The required setback is 21' or the height to the structure from back of future curb. 2. Distance from future right of way line to future curb, 3. Distance from center line of Miracle Mile to future right of way line. 4. The width of landscape border. 3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.8 The loading space indicated behind the parking spaces near the "future" office cannot be located in such a way as to block the parking spaces. 4. Per DS 2-02.2.1.9 Provide a detail of bicycle parking rack as well as a dimensioned layout for access to bicycle rack. 5. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11 The width of the PAAL behind the parking spaces located east of the office does not meet LUC Sec. 3.3.7.2. The minimum width of a PAAL is 24' in back of parking spaces which are 90 degrees to the PAAL. 6. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.3 The indicated storage areas are considered vehicular use areas and must be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. 7. Per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 The vehicular use areas along the west, south and a portion of the north side of the property require post barricades or wheel stop curbing to prevent vehicles from driving on unimproved portions of the site. 8. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12 Clearly indicate the accessible pedestrian circulation path for this site. Indicate location of required handicap ramps, cross walks and sidewalks from the right of way to any doors in the "future" office. See DS 2-08 for pedestrian circulation requirements. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. 9. Per DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, indicate the location, size, type and height of existing or proposed freestanding signage including billboards. 10. Per DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, indicate the existing and proposed lighting layout and type. 11. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.1 Provide the gross and net lot area. 12. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.2 Provide the floor area for each building. 13. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide the allowed and proposed floor area ratio (FAR) calculation. 14. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.4 Clearly indicate how the parking calculations have been arrived at. See LUC Sec. 3.3.4. under the storage use group. 15. Per DS 2-02.2.2.A.5 Provide calculations for required number of loading zones. The loading zones are based on LUC Sec. 3.4.5. The commercial storage areas as indicated on the site plan are to be used as gross floor area only for loading zone criteria as per a determination by the Zoning Administrator. This will result in 3 loading zones being required with 4 being proposed. Please indicate the required and proposed loading zones. 16. For your information a building permit is required for fences in excess of 6' in height. 17. Depending on changes made to this site plan and responses to above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. |
| 09/20/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 09/21/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 6' screen is required per LUC 3.7.2-I to screen outdoor storage from Miracle Mile and commercial properties. 2. Fences, such as chain link, must have wooden slat inserts to provide opacity per LUC 3.3.3.7.D. 3. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Trees are required for the entire vehicle use area. 4. The vehicular use area must include post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Provide barricades for the entire vehicle use area including loading zones to prevent vehicle access to storage areas per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 5. Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0 6. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/21/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0. |
| 10/06/2005 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 6th, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM04276 PROJECT NAME: Material Storage PROJECT ADDRESS: 1315 E. Miracle Mile PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Add a legend to the plan indicating different line type, shading, etc. 2. Show more drainage patterns and finish grades on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 3. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all future structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS 2-08.4.1.E 4. Indicate fill quantities on the site plan. If fill quantities equal zero indicate on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 5. Show the recordation information for Miracle Mile. 6. After reviewing an aerial photo and the Transportation Department Map Site the ROW dimensions appear to be drawn incorrectly. The full MS & R ROW is 150', 75' half ROW. There are two dimensions shown on the plan that are not labeled. One dimension is to the property line and the other is to the front of sidewalk. The future ROW dimension will be the future property line and must be shown on the site plan. The existing (current) ROW dimension must also be shown. Dimension the Future MS&R ROW width from street centerline. Dimension the future curb and sidewalk location. Label accordingly. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. 7. The sight visibility triangles (SVT) may be drawn incorrectly based on the above comment. Revise the SVTs accordingly. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 8. Is it not clear if there is existing sidewalk along the ROW. Is the depicted 6' sidewalk exiting or proposed? Dimensions from street centerline to the existing curb, sidewalk, and utility lines. (See above comment 6). Label dimensions accordingly. If existing sidewalk is not within the ROW please indicate so in the response letter and label the depicted 6' sidewalk as proposed. DS 2-01.2.1.A.21. 9. Show more spot elevations as pertinent and give Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 10. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. 11. Indicate the dimensions for the trash enclosure (detail 3) on the inside of the enclosure. DS 6-01. 12. The loading area can not be located behind parking spaces. Loading spaces may not be located in travel lanes of a PAAL. Revise the site plan to show the loading area in a different location. Show maneuverability to the loading area. LUC 3.4.3.2. 13. Clearly indicate pedestrian circulation from the ROW to the "future" trailer. DS 2-08., 3-05. 14. Per the drainage report from JE Fuller/Hydrology & Geomorphology, Inc the project site is effected by City of Tucson regulatory flow (100-year flow). Show the location and label appropriately on the plan the offsite to onsite 100-yr flow that is provided in the drainage report. 15. A floodplain use permit is required for this project. Submit a floodplain use permit application at the time of the second submittal. The floodplain use permit application (blue card) is handed out at the Engineering Counter at Development Services Department. 16. Show the location of the water surface elevation (WSE) of the 100-yr peak flow. Label appropriately and include the line weight in the legend. Give the datum used for the elevation. 17. Add a note to the plan stating this development is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations. Include the WSE, the recommended finish floor elevation (FFE) and the datum in the note. 18. Indicate on the future structure the recommended FFE. Please note if the structure is a trailer rather than an "FFE" the lowest structural member is required to be one foot above the WSE. 19. Please note a condition of this permit contains a requirement that the applicant, or the applicant's authorized representative, complete a FEMA Elevation Certificate and is returned to DSD Engineering prior to approval of special inspection. 20. Drainage report states on page 3 that a retention basin is located on the southwest corner of the site. A retention basin is not indicated on the plan. A large water harvesting area is shown on the plan. Is the intent to use the water harvesting area as the retention basin? Revise the site plan to show the required retention basin. Label appropriately. Provide a cross-section of the basin in reference to the road. Show the elevation of the top and bottom of the basin and give the water surface elevation of the basin. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6 21. Show on the plan in an appropriate location on the site plan the volume of the retention basin indicated in the drainage report. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A. 22. Show the ponding limits for the retention basin. Use a specific line weight and include in the legend. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.4.e. 23. Show the location of the 15' vehicular access ramp that is indicated in the drainage report on page 3. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A.4.b. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. In the table estimating the retention volume, the shown coefficient, 0.586 for the developed condition is low. It appears the used coefficient is for the 2-year storm event. This project must meet the 5-yr threshold requirements, which has a different coefficient. In addition the Zoning section comments, comment 6, is requesting the material storage areas must be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. Thus, the project will have more impervious surface than what is currently proposed. Because of this, the developed coefficient used to estimate the retention volume is again to low. Revise the retention volume to include the correct coefficient for developed conditions. 2. Include an updated site plan with the second submittal, showing the requested changes per the review comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2005 | SPOWELL1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/31/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |