Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T05CM03968
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the water pressure calculations per Appendix A. Based on the information shown some of the pipe sizes are not adequate for the demand. Reference Section 610.5, UPC 1994. |
| 09/30/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Coordinate the locations of the rooftop units shown on the structural drawing (S-3) with the mechanical drawing (M-1). Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2000. 2. The provided ventilation calculation assumes that all of the additional floor area is composed of patient exam rooms, neglecting the reception room. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation based on the various room types shown in Table 403.3. Reference Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2000. |
| 10/07/2005 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 10/10/05 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM03968 PROJECT NAME: Addition Carol McGonigle, D.D.S. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1802 E. Prince Rd. ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: Thomas Panno PROJECT REVIEWER: Christy Foreman TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CFOREMA1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1) It appears actual sq. footage of building equals 4000-sq. ft. Please clarify and adjust occupant load accordingly. 2) Please show circular clear floor space in each handicap restroom see ANSI A117.1 2003 section 304.3.1. Door swing in clear floor space, see section 603.2.3 exception 2. Provide one accessible restroom per sex minimum. 3) Clarify accessibility from parking into building. Show striped path from parking to sidewalk. Provide ramp at grade change and aceesible route to entry and then to restroom facilities. It appears it would be better to have handicap parking located near the new entry to help eliminate the danger of being hit by vehicles just entering the site. 4) Entry joists need to be specified on sht. S-3 Roof Framing Plan. 5) Clarify justification for footings specified on drawings S-2. 6) Specify footing sht. S-2 at entry pier per structural calculations page 15. 7) Justify column members at entry with structural calculations. 8) Clarify roof framing can carry additional load of mechanical equipment. |
| 10/10/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Will be approved upon final approval of the site plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1191 Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/25/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2005 | GBONILL1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/09/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |