Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T05CM03968
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/22/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Show the same locations for the rooftop units on the roof framing drawing (S-3) and on the mechanical drawing (M-1). The trusses have not been designed yet and the truss designers need to know where the point loads are to be located. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2000. |
| 11/23/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The water pipe sizes are correct per Appendix A but while the plumbing schedule calls for adding three new water closets, only two new water closets are shown on the drawings. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. 2. Coordinate the location of the floor cleanout shown on the riser diagram with the location shown on the plumbing plan. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994. |
| 11/30/2005 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 12/1/05 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM03968 PROJECT NAME: Addition Carol McGonigle, D.D.S. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1802 E. Prince Rd. ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: Thomas Panno PROJECT REVIEWER: Christy Foreman TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CFOREMA1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1) It appears actual sq. footage of building equals 4000-sq. ft. Please clarify and adjust occupant load accordingly. Still not revised on sht. T-1. |
| 12/05/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/19/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul Planner Technician PROJECT: T05CM03968 1802 East Prince Road Third review of dental addition TRANSMITTAL: December 20, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. This site review is for an addition of a dental office in the C-1 Zone. The expansion of the building is greater than 25%: therefore this site review is for a full code compliance of the site. The Development Designator is "29" and the use is Medical Service - Outpatient. LUC Sec 2.5.3.2.A.10 & LUC Sec 3.3.3.12. 2. "An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements with the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be as exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City." Please provide a future site plan depicting how the site will be composed and demonstrate compliance with the LUC after the street width has been expanded to meet the MS&R plan. (See comment #5.) LUC Sec 2.8.3.5.F 3. Additional or extra parking may be placed in the future right-of-way to be removed when the street widening occurs, but required parking may not be placed in the future right-of-way. Please revise your parking calculations. At present, twenty-two (22) parking spaces are required and only twenty-one (21) are provided outside of the future right-of-way. This number may be lower on the future plan. Therefore, it may be necessary to apply for a Board of Adjustment variance for reduced parking or reduce the square footage of the expansion. (See comment #5.) DS 2-02.2.1.A.8, LUC Sec 3.3.4 & LUC Sec 2.8.3.7 4. Clearly delineate the future right-of-way and the future curb for the full width of the site. LUC Sec 2.8.3 5. Although the response comment (comment #3) suggests that there will be a plan relative to the future right-of-way, no such plan has been provided. The following comment (comment #4) states that there shall be a simple twelve and one-half percent (12.5%) reduction in the parking requirement. This approach is incorrect. Please read the appropriate section of the Land Use Code and use the formula for parking reduction provided in Section 3.3.7.8. In addition, the lot size and dimensions on this site plan appear to be incorrect. The Pima County Assessor's Record Map provides significantly different dimensions than those provided on this submittal. Please correct the dimensions and the relevant calculations for the site. LUC Sec 3.3.7.8 & DS 2-02.2.2.A 6. Please provide handicapped accessible ramps to provide access to all accessible entrances of the structures. Please provide truncated domes at every handicapped accessible transition ramp. Also delineate a crosswalk from the handicapped parking spaces loading area to the accessible ramp at the pedestrian refuge adjacent to the building. (See comment #7.) ICC/ANSI A117.1-2005: Sec 406.1, 406.6, 406.12 & Sec 705.5 7. A minimum setback distance of five feet (5'-0") must be provided between the parking area access lane (PAAL) and the building as a pedestrian refuge. This pedestrian refuge must provide a four foot (4'-0") sidewalk that is setback a minimum distance of one foot (1'-0") from the PAAL. The sidewalks must be physically separated from the PAAL by curbing or other barriers except at the crosswalk. Please revise the pedestrian refuge area and the sidewalk and demonstrate compliance. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1, DS 3-01.3.3.B.5 & DS 2-08.4.1 8. The van accessible parking space is identified as being a space in the north of the parking lot when it is depicted somewhat farther south in the parking lot. Please revise the plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/22/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/22/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |