Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM03812
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/21/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/29/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a landscape plan. Any change in design or land use requires a new review and approval process for the landscape plan. DS 2-07.1.2, DS 2-07.2.0 2) Include the following information on the landscape plan: A) Square footage of the vehicular use area, existing and proposed. Expansions of vehicle use areas are subject to LUC 3.7.1.2. B) Minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of tree planters in vehicular use areas. Inside dimensions of tree planters are to be a minimum of four feet wide per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. C) Length and width of landscape borders and landscape transition borders and number of canopy trees per length. D) Irrigation plan. 3) Walls for the refuse storage enclosure are to be a minimum of six feet high. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4) Revise sheet A0.1 to revise the description of Country Club Road. It is not a scenic route. 5) A street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 is required along 1st Street adjacent to any new development. Street borders may be required along the entire length all street frontages in accordance with LUC 3.7.1.2. 6) Sheet A0-1 identifies an "existing 10' landscape border" between the street curbs along 1st Street. Revise for accuracy. 7) Additional comments may apply pending submittal of the requested landscape plans. |
| 08/01/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a native plant preservation plan of application for exception. LUC 3.8 |
| 08/02/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on a 24.79% building area expansion resulting in a full code compliance review of the expansion area only. 1. Note the legal description. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2) 2. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of two (2) separate parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. A copy of the City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant may be obtained online at www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Lot_Combo_Declaration.pdf. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2) 3. Dimension the minimum one (1) foot separation between the new parking canopy and the edge of PAAL. (D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.2) 4. Add a note, which states the existing and proposed uses as they are listed under C-1 zoning in the LUC. Administrative and Professional Office "29" Animal Service "28", subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.1.A, .B, .C, and .D. 5. Zoning classification of the adjacent properties to the north are C-2. Revise plan as required. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) 6. Revise the floor area ratio (FAR) as follows: Maximum allowed FAR: .35 Proposed FAR: .25 7. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment. |
| 08/02/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/18/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Scott Isles DATE: August 18, 2005 FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE Engineering Division SUBJECT: 3113 E 1st St Site plan T05CM03812 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 9 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Provide additional flow arrows to ensure that the proposed structure will not have any adverse effects on the existing drainage patterns, and that positive flow will be maintained around the new addition. 2. Provide flow arrows on the new pavement for the same reason as above. Ensure that no nuisance ponding will take place in and around the new structure and all pavements due to the proposed improvements. 3. Indicate location of any additional down spouts. 4. Due to the additional roof runoff will scuppers be needed for adjacent sidewalks around the proposed addition? 5. The maneuverability of the solid waste vehicles appears to be too difficult of a maneuver. Please concur with John Clark of Environmental Services to ensure that this configuration will be suitable. Please provide DSD Engineering any written conformation from Mr. Clark. Drainage Statement: No Comments If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1191 Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 0000 O. Street Address |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2005 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/26/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |