Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM03335
Parcel: 13332013J

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T05CM03335
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/08/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/20/2005 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Revise the site, grading, landscape and NPP plans to show the same right-of-way improvements.
07/20/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the site, landscape, and grading plans to show the same locations for curbs and sidewalks in the adjacent right-of-way areas. DS 2-07.2.0

2) Show future sight triangles on the site and landscape plans. Revise plans as necessary to avoid conflicts.
DS 3-01.5.0

3) Correct all sheet references for the sections and details on Sheets S1.1, 3, & 4.
07/20/2005 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 22, 2005
TO: Danny Quihuis, ADG
SUBJECT: Broadway/Harrison Retail Shell, 9485 E. Broadway Bl. Site and Grading Plan Review
REVIEWER: Loren Makus, E.I.T.
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T05CM03335 and T05BU01702

SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Plan were reviewed by Development Services Department Engineering Division and were not approved at this time. Revise the site and grading plans in accordance with the following comments.
Site and Grading Plan comments:
1. DS 11-01.8.1.A Revise the site and grading plans so that no more than two feet of fill is to be placed in the north 100 feet of the project area unless all of the requirements of the Development Standard have been met. Either lower the proposed grades so that less than 2 feet of fill will be placed in this area or meet all the notification and mitigation requirements of the development standard.
2. The proposed grading plan indicates that there will be offsite grading. Provide a letter from the Department of Transportation indicating that the grading into the right of way is acceptable to the City and that it doesn't conflict with the referenced improvement plans.
3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show future sight visibility triangles for each driveway and for the intersection of Broadway Boulevard and Harrison Road.
4. Clarify Keynote 15 on Sheet S1.1. No basin appears to be proposed in the grading and paving plans.
5. Revise Grading and Paving Note 9 to indicate that all grading will comply with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.
6. Provide truncated dome warning surfaces for each area where sidewalks abut vehicle use areas with no vertical separation such as access ramps and depressed sidewalks.
7. Revise the detail for the solid waste enclosure on Sheet 1 of 1 to conform with the detail on Sheet 4 of 9 (Detail 8/3). Ten feet of clear space is required between the bollards along the sides of the solid waste enclosure.

Revise the Site Plan and Grading Plan, to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies of the Site Plan Grading Plan. If you would like to meet with me to discuss any of these comments please call me at (520) 791-5550 ext. 1161 or email me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov.

Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
08/03/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Add the legal description. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2)

2. Verify existing lot dimensions and bearings. Has the area designated as "right of way acquisition" on the plan been dedicated/acquired and recorded. If so, remove reference "right of way acquisition" as it implies the area has yet to be dedicated. City of Tucson Transportation Department Maps currently indicate this area as public right-of-way. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5)

3. Based on the lot dimensions provided, the gross site area listed under LUC Project Data block is incorrect. Revise as required. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A)

4. Revise setback requirements listed under the Project Data block to the following. North: 25 feet; West: 0 feet; South and East: greater of, 21 feet or the building height , measured from back future curb. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7)

5. Label and dimension future sight visibility triangles. Assure that proposed sign does not interfere with SVT. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10)

6. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.4.1, the required loading space shall be located on the same site or lot as the use it serves. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14)

7. Provide a copy of the recorded cross access agreement and indicate if the agreement is intended for vehicles and/or pedestrians. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11)


8. If applicable, all existing and proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20)


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person.
08/04/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied Refer to Zoning Review comments.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/09/2005 JMORALE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/09/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed