Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T05CM03283
Parcel: 12006221B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T05CM03283
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/31/2005 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied needs site plan to show method/location of connection to public sewer.
FLOOR PLANS, PLUMBING PLANS & SITE UTILITY PLANS MUST MATCH. LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 MOST CLOSELY MATCHES THE PLUMBING PLANS
11/04/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied Site plan must be approved prior to building plan approval. A copy of the stamped approved site plan must be included in the building plan set.
11/06/2005 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: November 6, 2005
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM03283
PROJECT NAME: District Street Duplex
PROJECT ADDRESS: 113 East District Street
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT

1. All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or microfilmed for record keeping purposes. The current font measures to 10 point with several site plan notes; grading notes, parking calculations, lot coverage, site plan notes. Revise all lettering to be at least 12 point.

2. It is acknowledged that the cut and fill quantities have been shown on the site plan. This site is required to have a formal (separate from the site plan) grading plan review and grading permit. Submit a grading plan application (Green Card) with the grading plan.

3. It is not clear why removal of 4 blocks on the northwest side is proposed. Stormwater must be accepted and released from developments essentially at the same locations, and with the same magnitudes, as encountered under natural or existing conditions. The request was made for positive drainage to the northwest side of the property. The wall is existing and stormwater will now flow onto the adjacent properties. How will the adjacent properties not be impacted from a 100-year storm event? Clarify and provide supporting documentation in the drainage report that the adjacent properties will not be impacted or revise the site plan.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/23/2005 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed