Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Permit Number - T05CM03124
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2005 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/25/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: William Daniels, PE, Gregor and Grenier Engineering, Inc. SUBJECT: 3237 W LOST MESA PL Grading Review LOCATION: T14S, R13E, Section 20 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05BU01758, T05CM03124 Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted items, and does not recommend approval at this time. Address the following comments for the grading plan sheets 1 and 2 labeled "Grading and Drainage Plan": GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.11-01.4.C: Provide the following clarification/notations on the grading plan: a) Address the following grading limit comments: i) Delineate grading limits that includes disturbance area and any additional construction staging areas, construction materials, and vehicle parking. It is important to clarify actual disturbance area that will be needed to construct the house, retaining walls, and yard improvements. ii) Assure the note for square footage of disturbance reflects the actual graded area. iii) Label any construction staging area that will be revegetated or improved as noted. b) DS Sec.11-01.10.5: Address the following interceptor swale comments: i) Capacity for interceptors shall have a minimum of 30-in wide and 12-in deep, unless a larger capacity is necessary for the uphill contributing watershed. ii) Concrete swales have higher potential for erosion at swale exits and may breakover edges at turns in the swale since concrete conveys stormwater at higher velocities than grouted rip rap. Provide grouted rock or other design to reduce velocity or provide calculations to show that the swales contain the flow and the flow exits at a non-erosive velocity. iii) There appears to be a potential for stormwater from the upstream watershed to enter into the small rear yard area. To reduce the amount of ponding in this yard area, continuation of the interceptor swale is required. c) There are cut / fill slopes proposed at over 10-ft in height at 1:1(H:V). Provide geotechnical report that discusses stability as well as erosion protection. Provide documentation from a geotechnical engineer that provides an assessment with any recommendations of the proposed slope design. d) Address the following general grading note comments: i) Add a general note stating that materials and / or construction equipment may not be stockpiled or parked outside of grading limits at any time. ii) Revise Standard Paving and Grading Note 9 to state that all grading construction work shall conform to IBC Chapter 18, City of Tucson DS Sec.11-01 and Hillside Development Zone requirements DS Sec.9-04.3. iii) Add a note that clarifies that separate building permit applications are required for the retaining walls. e) Show detail 2-3 as referenced on sheet 2, keynote 1. 2) Land Use Code (LUC) Sec. 2.8.1: The General Note 9 on the Quail Hollow at Starr Pass Final Plat states that prior to issuance of any building permits, Hillside Development Zone approval is required for lots 32 - 34. Contact Zoning for compliance procedure, that may include ACS calculations and an overlay application. 3) For resubmittal, assure all information is filled out on grading application (green card). Please provide three copies of the revised grading plan, response letter, any drainage supporting documentation, and geotechnical report / documentation. I can be reached at 791-5550, ext.2204 if you have questions. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 11/30/2005 | DAVE MANN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide an accurate index to drawings on the first sheet of the set. IRC Section R106.1.1, Sheet S1 Every sleeping room and basement with habitable space shall have a least one window minimum net clear opening 5.7 square feet (minimum 5 square feet net clear opening at grade floor), minimum opening width of 20 inches, minimum opening height of 24 inches and the finished sill height shall not be more than 44 inches above the floor; or provide exterior door for emergency egress. IRC Section R310.1 Bedroom 2 Provide a note indicating all branch circuits installed in dwelling unit bedrooms shall be protected by an arc-fault circuit interrupter(s). NEC Article 210-12(b). IRC Section E 3802.11. Provide a lumen calculation for the total lumens on the site for the site area per Section 5 of the Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/17/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/07/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |