Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T05CM03024
Parcel: 117040660

Address:
643 N 4TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE

Permit Number - T05CM03024
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/24/2006 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
08/07/2006 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: August 10, 2006
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM03024
PROJECT NAME: Time Bomb Blast
PROJECT ADDRESS: 643 North 4th Ave
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN


1. It is acknowledged that Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) has been applied for. Please provide the DSMR case number and any conditions that may apply on the site plan.

2. At least one 4" sidewalk from the structure to the street is required to be shown on the site plan. It is acknowledged that in the response letter it states a 5' sidewalk has been shown on the site plan. However it is not clear where this has been shown on the site plan. The plan is very difficult to read. The purpose of a site plan is for the Engineering inspectors to utilize the plan for inspections. The plan must be legible and required information must be clearly described on the site plan. Show the sidewalk from the structure to the sidewalk in the ROW, label appropriately so it is clear what is being dimensioned.
09/21/2006 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T05CM03024
634 North 4th Avenue
SFR conversion to office & retail
2nd review


TRANSMITTAL: September 20, 2006


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.


1) This review is for the conversion of a two story single family residence (SFR) to commercial retail and office uses. The zoning is HC-3. The Development Designator is for each proposed use is "34" and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is DD. The retail use is subject to LUC Sec 3.5.9.2.A. This change of use requires full code compliance for this site (LUC Sec 2.5.2.A.1 & B.3; Sec 3.2.3.2.B and Sec 3.2.6.4). [Please see comment #9.]

2) All parking and maneuverability must be provided on site. The total number of parking spaces required on site is thirteen (13). See also LUC Sec 3.3.7.2 or. DS 3-05.0. Please identify all existing and proposed vehicle use areas and access points. Dimension all points of egress and ingress, parking spaces and parking area access lanes (PAALs) (DS 2-02.2.1.A.8, LUC Sec 3.3.4 and DS 2-02.2.1.A.11). [Please see comment #9.]

3) Please be aware that all business access points must be handicapped accessible. Accessible paths must not be steeper than 1:20 and ramps must not be steeper than 1:12 (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2005: Sec 402.2, Sec 403.3, Sec 405.2). Please revise the pedestrian circulation path along the south property line. (Truncated domes as detectable warning shall not be necessary on this site as presented.) Please dimension the width of the access ramps. The minimum clear width of the ramp run shall be thirty-six inches (36") measured between the handrails (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2005: Sec 405.5). It appears that there is less than the minimum width for the ramps along the south of the building. Please be aware that Historic Review does not review for handicapped accessibility: They only review for historic matter for that particular historic district.

4) Please clearly identify continuous pedestrian and handicapped circulation path on the site plan. This path must be a minimum of four feet (4'-0") wide and connect all public access areas on the site to the public sidewalk along the street. This pedestrian circulation path must meet or exceed the construction standards set forth in Development Standards 2-08.5.1 (DS 2-02.2.1.A.12, DS 2-08.3 & DS 2-08.5.1. A through .E).

5) Please provide one (1) 12' X 35' loading space on site (LUC Sections 3.4.5.3 and 3.4.5.5). Also, clearly depict the maneuvering area for the loading space on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.14). [Please see comment #9.]

6) Please provide the stamped approved site plan from Historic review and incorporate the stamped approved elevation plans into the set of plan.

7) Clearly depict the building footprint, all canopies and overhangs (DS 2-02.1.A.6). Do not use half tones for the building lines.

8) Please be aware that full code compliance is required for this change of use. Therefore, the parking and loading space requirements must be provided on site. You may apply for a variance for each of these requirements from the Board of Adjustment. [Please see comment #2 and #6.]

9) Please be aware that areas do not meet the minimums for off street vehicle use areas for commercial parking cannot be used for parking and all other forms of vehicle use (DS 3-05 and LUC Sections 3.3.3.1, 3.3.3.9 and 3.3.7.2).

10) There has been little progress or improvement with each submittal. The site plan submitted seems to be all the more confused. We would like to set-up a meeting before the next submittal with you the architect and the client. David Rivera, Patricia Gilbert and myself should be in attendance.

11) Please be aware that further review comments may be necessary due to additional information provided and/or revisions to the plans.

If you have any questions about this review for this submittal please call Michael St Paul @ 520-791-5608 X1184.
09/21/2006 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied See Zoning Review comments.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/29/2006 VFLORES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/29/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed