Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T05CM03024
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/22/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/28/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border is required per LUC 3.7.2.4. A street landscape border is an area running the full length of the street property line bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress 2. The Development Services Department Director may grant a complete or partial exception to the landscape / screening requirements for development within a Historic Preservation Zone. The exceptions may be granted if, after completion of the historic district development review required by the Historic Preservation Zone, the Development Services Department Director determines that the requirements are not compatible with the character and design elements of the historic district. (Ord.No. 9967, ยง3, 7/1/04). Approval is required in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. Contact Frank Podgorski @ 791-5550 EXT. 1145 with any questions regarding HPZ review process. |
| 03/29/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 03/31/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 3, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM03024 PROJECT NAME: Time Bomb Blast PROJECT ADDRESS: 643 North 4th Ave PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN 1. The site plan is drawn at a standard engineering scale no larger than l" = 60'. Revise the site plan to be drawn at the standard engineering scale. DS 2-02.2.1.A. The above comment is from the first review and still applies. Revise the site plan to show the entire site drawn at a standard engineering scale no larger than 1" = 60". 2. New projects will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection and pickup areas. Contact John Clark of Environmental Services @ 791-3175 ext. 1136 to reach an agreement that does not meet Development Standards 6-01. Provide written response and approval for current solid waste proposal from John Clark. The above comment is from the first review. It is acknowledged that John Clark from Environmental Services as accepted the proposal. However any solid Waste proposal not meeting a Development Standard is required to apply for a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR). Please contact Patricia Gehlen, Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) Manager for the DSMR submittal criteria. 3. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. Revise the plan to show sidewalks to 4th Avenue. DS 2-08.04. The response to the above comment was "The revised Site Plan contains no PAAL's> Nevertheless, covered porches at the entries above and below serve as refuges." This review is based on the fact the project is a change of use, single family residence to a commercial project, per DS 2-08.4. a sidewalk is required from the sidewalk located within the ROW to the structure. Clearly indicate on the site plan a 4' sidewalk from the sidewalk located within the ROW to the structure. |
| 05/18/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T05CM03024 634 North 4th Avenue SFR conversion to office & retail 2nd review TRANSMITTAL: May 24, 2006 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) This review is for the conversion of a two story single family residence (SFR) to commercial retail and office uses. The zoning is HC-3. The Development Designator is for each proposed use is "34" and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is DD. The retail use is subject to LUC Sec 3.5.9.2.A. This change of use requires full code compliance for this site (LUC Sec 2.5.2.A.1 & B.3; Sec 3.2.3.2.B and Sec 3.2.6.4). [Please see comment #9.] 2) All parking and maneuverability must be provided on site. The total number of parking spaces required on site is thirteen (13). See also LUC Sec 3.3.7.2 or. DS 3-05.0. Please identify all existing and proposed vehicle use areas and access points. Dimension all points of egress and ingress, parking spaces and parking area access lanes (PAALs) (DS 2-02.2.1.A.8, LUC Sec 3.3.4 and DS 2-02.2.1.A.11). Please see comment #9.] 3) Please dimension the bicycle parking facility on the site plan. Each bicycle parking space must be a minimum of seventy-two inches 72" long with an additional five feet (5'-0") aisle width for maneuvering. Also provide the location and type of lighting (DS 2-02.2.1.A.9). The bicycle rack you provided is not on Sheet A-2 as identified on A-1 as #5, but is actually on Sheet A-0. Please revise the plan and provide a fully dimensioned plan view of the bicycle parking (DS 2-09.2.3, DS 2-09.6.1.A & B and DS 2-09.6.2). 4) Please be aware that all business access points must be handicapped accessible. Accessible routs paths must not be steeper than 1:20 and ramps must not be steeper than 1:12 (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2005: Sec 402.2, Sec 403.3, Sec 405.2). Please revise the pedestrian circulation path along the south property line. Please provide truncated domes at every handicapped accessible transition ramp (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2005: Sec 402.2, Sec 403.3, Sec 405.2, Sec 406.12 & Sec 705.5). Please be aware that Historic Review does not review for handicapped accessibility: They only review for historic matter for that particular historic district. 5) Please provide the floor area ratio (FAR) on the site plan (Sheet A-1) and remove all site data from Sheet A-0 (DS 2-02.2.2.A.3). Also notice that you have two conflicting lot coverage calculation figures (16% and 20%) on Sheet A-1. 6) Please provide one (1) 12' X 35' loading space on site (LUC Sections 3.4.5.3 and 3.4.5.5). Also, clearly depict the maneuvering area for the loading space on the site plan (DS 2-02.2.1.A.14). [Please see comment #9.] - 7) Please provide a dimensioned elevation of the forty-seven foot (47') retaining wall along the north side of the building. 8) Please correct the eighteen (18') and eleven foot (11') eaves to eighteen (18") and eleven (11") on Sheet A-1 and remove number 7 for "construction brick paver" from the center of the building on Sheet A-1. 9) Please provide the stamped approved site plan from Historic review and incorporate the stamped approved elevation plans into the set of plan. 10) Please be aware that full code compliance is required for this change of use. Therefore, the parking and loading space requirements must be provided on site. You may apply for a variance for each of these requirements from the Board of Adjustment. [Please see comment #2 and #6.] 11) Notes that contradict the code requirements must be removed from this plan. Please be aware that additional review comments may be necessary due to additional information provided and/or revisions to the plans. If you have any questions about this review for this submittal please call Michael St Paul @ 520-791-5608 X1184. |
| 05/24/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning review comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/26/2006 | GBONILL1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/26/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |