Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM02753
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/05/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Site and Graidng review - 1449 W. Kilburn St. DATE: 5 July 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM02753 T13S, R13E, Section 27 Engineering Division has reviewed the site and grading plans. Approval is not recommended at this time. Please provide revised site and grading plans addressing the comments provided below. SITE PLAN: 1. Please specify the proposed new concrete driveway apron to be constructed in accordance with Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Detail 206 (PC/COT SD 206) on the site and grading plan sheets.. 2. Please assure all easements are graphically shown on the plan with recording information provided (Development Standard - DS 2-02.2.1 A 20). 3. Provide dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines (DS 2-02.2.1 A 21). 4. Revise keynote 9 to specify a 5" thick concrete pad, minimum. Include notation for sidewall bollards to be installed, and specify a minimum dimension of 10' clear inside, between the bollards (DS 2-02.02.1 A 32 & 6-01.4.2 C 1). 5. Depict and label roof drainage arrows and any sidewalk scuppers for conveyance of roof drainage under pedestrian/sidewalk areas. Sidewalk scuppers must be depicted; fully labeled and dimensioned for 10-year (min.) flow conveyance under all sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 & 5.1 E). 6. Please identify whether the sidewalk in the Kilburn St. right of way is new or existing, and depict as 5'wide sidewalk (DS 3-01.3.3 A ). 7. Identify whether the CMU walls are existing or proposed under keynote 6. If proposed, provide a note to construct regular wall opening at grade, for acceptance/conveyance of offsite drainage at historic acceptance points. GRADING PLAN: 1. Please reflect revisions in response to all site plan comments above, on the grading plan sheet C-2. 2. Depict and label grading limits. 3. Provide a note specifying grading to be in conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (Excavation and Grading). 4. Provide a basis of elevation and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. 5. Demonstrate water harvesting maximization in all landscaped areas. Typically, these areas may be depressed up to 6" (maximum) with directing of a portion of, or in some instances all, site drainage into these areas to achieve such. Resubmittal will require a revised site plan addressing all items listed above. Please include three (3) sets of grading plans with the resubmittal package. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov Douglas Williams Sr. Eng. Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 07/06/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 07/06/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens FOR: David Rivera Senior Planner Principal Planner PROJECT: T05CM02753 1449 W. Kilburn St. Apartments Site Plan Transmittal date: 1st Review 7/04/05 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Provide a scaled location map as per DS 2-05.2. 1.D. A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile and be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile. 2. The project data information provided is indicating this project is with in a developing area in regards to street perimeter setbacks using LUC Table 3.2.6.I. This project is in an established area and must meet required setbacks. See the following comment. Change the project data information to reflect the corrected information. The proposed street perimeter yard setback of ten (10) feet from the street property line does not meet required setback as per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.A. Within established areas, the front street perimeter yard is twenty (20) feet or one and one-half (1 1/2) the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of ninety (90) feet. A Board of Adjustment variance is required or a redesign of the project to meet the required setback. If a variance is to be applied for, complete all corrections requested by all reviewers except items that will be included in the variance request. Board of Adjustment comments can then be written by the zoning reviewer for the application to the Board of Adjustment for the variance. For further information regarding the variance procedures contact Wayne Bogdan or Russlyn Wells @ 791-5640. 3. The bicycle parking must be visible from the public right of way or be provided with directional signage as per DS 2-09.5.1 Entry and Directional Signage. Where not directly visible and obvious from the public right(s)-of-way, project entry and directional signs will be provided to direct bicyclists from the public right-of-way to the bicycle parking facility. The bicycle parking spaces must be provided with an access aisle as per DS 2-09.6.2 Aisle Width. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row or between two (2) rows of bicycle parking. 4. Along the west side of southern structure a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area is required as per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. The refuge area may have a roof for shade, provided it contains a sidewalk and pedestrian access which is unobstructed and is set back one (1) foot from the PAAL. 5. Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. Provide a detail and locations of truncated domes. 6. Detail 11 of C3 for the disabled sign does not contain the current approved information. See attached sheet for correct information. 7. If applicable, provide location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage, including billboards. DS 2-02.2.1.13 8. If applicable, all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. DS 2-02.2.1.20 9. If applicable, provide existing and proposed lighting layout and type. DS 2-02.2.1.25 10. See landscape reviewers comments regarding landscape borders, screen walls and NPPO requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. |
| 07/07/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. Revise or remove calculations on title sheet and include them on landscape plan. 2. A 10' interior landscape border is required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential property to the west per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of interior landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 4. A 5' continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided. per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 5. Provide a 5' wall to screen vehicle use area from residential use areas. Per LUC 3.7.2-I Include all walls on landscape plan. 6. Revise note regarding decomposed granite on landscape plan to read: All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. 7. Vehicular and pedestrian safety factors must be incorporated into all landscape designs. Safety factors include plant materials that at maturity do not present hazards to passersby or obstruct visibility of pedestrians or vehicles and other factors as listed in Development Standard No. 2-06.0. Remove Yucca Rostrata from pedestrian access or vehicle use area. 8. Additional comments may apply |
| 07/08/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | exception |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2005 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/15/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |