Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM02599
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/23/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4, is a area running the full length of the street property line bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress, refuse storage can not be located within street landscape border. 2. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 3. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving designs. A water-conserving design, includes grouping of plants with similar water requirements and use of efficient irrigation systems per LUC 3.7.4.1 Larrea divaricata requires little to no supplemental watering when established and will be affected negatively by over irrigating. Rosmarinus officinalis and Lantana montevidensis are both a moderate water user and will need to be watered throughout their life span. Cassia artemisioides would be an acceptable substitute for the Creosote. 4. Show the locations of the screen walls on the landscape plan also provide wall sections including heights, and finished grades per DS 2-07.2.2.3. ALL required screening must be provided on the developing property or a joint-use agreement must be provided. Verify if existing walls are located on site or provide appropriate documentation. 5. Revise plant symbols so then can be easy identified on landscape plan per DS 2-06.2.2.A |
| 06/23/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Indicate contour intervals along with north arrow and scale. This should be placed together. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1 3. Use different line weights to indicate different symbols and area delineation's. 4. Correct all text overlays. 5. Indicate dimensions for backup spur. 6. Curb access ramps should be constructed with truncated domes. Correct and revise. 7. Graphically indicate downspouts and or downspout symbol. Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E 8. Indicate a dimensioned detail of roof downspout and splash plate. 9. An 18-foot radius curb return is required for driveway apron. Correct and label curb returns. 10. Indicate if street is Public or Private. Alley access is not allowed. Align driveway access to existing driveway across the street. Closed unused driveways. Show adjacent driveways. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 11. If applicable, indicate all easements of record to be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 13. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23 Use a different line weight for existing or proposed contours. Indicate datum used to determine finish floor elevation. 14. New projects, including mobile home parks, consisting of 3 or more dwelling units will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection and pickup areas. Contact John Clark of Environmental Services @ 791-3175 ext. 1136 to reach an agreement that does not meet Development Standards 6-01 and to obtain a DSMR. Indicate a refuse enclosure detail as per D.S. 6-01.4.2 15. Remove bold dash/dot line indicated in PAAL area. 16. It appears that pedestrians' will cross into an area that is not designated to access. Demonstrate how pedestrians will avoid crossing into the area between the PAAL and sidewalk area to access their homes. Grading Plan 1. Indicate a dimensioned detail of weep holes. Indicate water surface elevation. Indicate and label all weep holes throughout wall. 2. Indicate water surface elevation and drainage slopes for drainage swales. 3. Indicate contour intervals along with north arrow and scale. 4. The refuse container location indicates ponding. Correct for proper drainage. 5. Indicate finished floor elevations for structures as per the drainage statement. Indicate datum used to determine finish floor elevation. 6. Indicate a dimensioned detail of PAAL from property line to property line. Drainage Statement 1. Indicate parcel code number 110-06-0760 to Sheet 1 Paragraph 1. 2. Indicate maintenance responsible party; name, address, and telephone number of the person (s) responsible for operation, maintenance and liability for any or all drainage structures and weep holes. 3. Add a statement on the type of impact the discharge from the water harvesting will have to the adjacent properties. |
| 06/24/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/27/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. A 17 foot setback building setback is required from the north property line based on the proposed building height of 22' 8". The current site plan shows a setback of 16' 11", one (1) inch short of the required setback. 2. Dimension the back-up spur radii. Three (3) foot minimum required. 3. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person. |
| 06/27/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2005 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/11/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |