Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM02319
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide complete code review checklist. 2. Provide site plan showing entire width of 7th Ave. with diagonal parking spaces in place. 3. Show location of existing fire hydrants on site plan. |
| 07/12/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on a full code compliance review of the entire site. 1. Note the legal description of the subject property. As a result of the lot reconfiguration, a new legal description of the property shall be recorded and proof of recordation shall be provided to the Zoning Review Section for DSD records. In addition, a copy of the last stamped approved site plan for the adjacent property to the north shall be provided. This is required to verify that no LUC requirements for the adjacent property shall be affected as part of the lot reconfiguration. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2) 2. Under the LUC Data block, revise the maximum allowed building height to 75 feet. 3. Under the LUC Data Block, revise the proposed maximum building height to correctly reflect the building height elevation drawings. Building height shall be measured from design grade elevation to the highest point of the flat roof. Perimeter yard width requirements (see comment 5) may not be verified for compliance until this information has been correctly shown on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) (LUC 3.2.7.2.A) 4. All structures must be located on site. Balconies overhang into the 7th Ave. right-of-way. 5. Dimension building setbacks (perimeter yard widths) from all property lines. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 Perimeter Yard Indicator "CC", north and south lot line perimeter yards shall be based on the height of the exterior building wall. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.A, within established areas, the front street perimeter yard is twenty (20) feet or one and one-half (1 1/2) the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of ninety (90) feet. Where a lot abuts more than one (1) street, the owner shall choose which street lot line is the front lot line. From other than the front lot line, the street perimeter yard is ten (10) feet. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7) 6. Under the vehicle parking calculation, revise the ratios for the residential units and the total number of vehicle parking spaces required for this project. The correct number of vehicle parking spaces required for a 2 bedroom unit are two (2) spaces, and 1.5 spaces for a studio over 400 square feet in size. Based on the information provided for this project, a total of 32 vehicle parking spaces are required for the proposed retail and residential uses. The plan provides for 21 vehicle parking spaces. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4) (LUC 3.3.4) 7. Provide a fully dimensioned detail for the handicap parking space, access aisle, access ramp/s, and sign. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003) 8. Under the bicycle parking calculation, change to the number 43 to the number, which reflects the total number of vehicle parking spaces required for this project (32). 9. A pedestrian easement shall be provided for this project along the north property line. 10. If applicable, provide the location, type, size, and height of existing and/or proposed free standing sign, billboard, and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25) 11. The required loading space shall be located on the same site or lot as the use it serves. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14) (LUC 3.4.4.1) 12. All existing and proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 13. Note the zoning classification of the adjacent parcels (C-3). (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) 14. Under the LUC Data block, revise the permitted uses from "Mixed Use" to the principal land uses listed under C-3 zoning in the LUC. Clearly list the land use classification/s, development designator, and applicable "subject to" sections. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) 15. Under the LUC Data block, revise the maximum allowed F.A.R. from 1.5 to 2.0. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3) 16. Under the LUC Data block, provide the maximum allowed lot coverage (80%) and correct the proposed lot coverage. (Lot coverage is comprised of 1st floor building area plus vehicular use area divided by the gross site area). (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3) 17. A back-up spur will be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. (D.S. 3-05.2.2.D) 18. Dimension the wheel stops or provide it on a detail. When wheel stop curbing is used, it is to be located two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking space. (D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2) 19. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. (D.S. 2-07.2.1.A) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person. |
| 07/13/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | This project is being reviewed for potential variance items. This is not a complete site plan review. Due to lack of a landscape plan and a detailed site plan, this review should be considered preliminary only. Additional comments that require additional variances may be forthcoming. 1) The site requires a street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 along 7th Avenue. 2) The parking lot is required to provide canopy trees in compliance with LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1 3) Screeing in accordance with LUC Table 3.7.2-I is required for the site. |
| 07/14/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a fully dimensioned detail for the handicap parking space, access aisle, access ramp/s, and sign. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003) |
| 07/15/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Client Paul Pena DATE: July 15, 2005 FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE Engineering Division SUBJECT: Street Address Site plan T04CM02319 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 12 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Plan Sheets cannot be approved as submitted. There is insufficient information on the submitted plan sheets, therefore the Engineering Division is unable to conduct a review at this time. A Site Plan is required for a review. Please refer to the City of Tucson Development Standards No. 2-02.0 for standards and guidelines of required contents to a site plan. The following comments are standard comments that summarize the Development Standards for the Engineering Division only. Please review these standard comments and incorporate the changes on to the site plan. Attached with these Comments is a hard copy of the Development Standards No. 2-02.0. This project is located in FEMA Flood Zone Map Panel 2226-AE Zone; therefore a Drainage Report and a Flood Use Permit will be required. Submit a drainage report with the next submittal. Plans: 1. Please provide North arrow and scale per D.S. 2-02.2.1. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 4. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 7. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 8. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 9. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 10. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 11. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 12. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 13. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 14. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the SP. 15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 16. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 17. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 18. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 19. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 20. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 21. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 22. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 23. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 24. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 25. "A grading permit and grading plan will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval, a grading plan may be reviewed in conjunction with site plan reviews. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the grading plans". If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1191 Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov Jose E. Ortiz Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 07/15/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |