Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM02087
Parcel: 12713036B

Address:
5910 E 5TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T05CM02087
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/10/2005 JIM EGAN FIRE REVIEW Approv-Cond Fire approval for site access and fire hydrant locations only.
05/24/2005 JOSE ORTIZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: May 25, 2005
FROM: Jose E. Ortiz
Engineering Division

SUBJECT: Orthodox Christian Church of the Holy Resurrection;
5910 E. 5th St. , Tucson Arizona 85711
Site plan T05CM02087 (First Review)
T14S, R14E, Section 12

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report.

The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

General Comment:

A grading permit, grading plan, and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading plans and 4 sets of SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is required during Grading plan submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. Please label bearings on monument lines per City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) 2-02.2.1.5
3. Confirm that all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) are being shown per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
4. 5' wide sidewalks are required on Sahuara Avenue per D.S. 3-01.3.3 Supplement No. 8 Pedestrian Circulation. In addition, 6' wide sidewalks are required on 5th Street per City Policy, which requires 6' sidewalk on all Arterial and Collector roads within the City of Tucson.
5. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Unable to determine loading zone.
6. Please clarify and show dimensioned future/existing right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Per the (MS&R) Plan 5th Street's ultimate right of way width is 90 feet.
7. Verify that all easements are being shown. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
8. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
9. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Depending on the time frame of the construction of phase 2 the proposed layout of the trash enclosure may not meet city standards. A temporary trash enclosure may need to be placed at a location more suitable for solid waste vehicle access.
10. The southeast portion of the proposed site appears to be 3 to 4 feet lower then the existing grades. A retaining wall and/or a GeoTech may be required to ensure that proper handling of this condition is conducted. For additional requirements refer to D.S. 11-01.
11. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
12. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
13. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for Site Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage.
3. Provide a watershed map or exhibit of proposed onsite and existing offsite flows on the property to ensure that each of the proposed retention basins obtain the proposed discharge/flows estimated in the DR.
4. Security barriers may be required along sidewalks adjacent to retention basin if basin side slopes exceed a 4:1 slope and where water depths exceed 2 feet per City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual page 82.
5. Provide typical section across retention basin to confirm cross slopes.
6. Provide correct location map in DR. The current map is for a location off of 36th St and Forgeus Ave.
7. Hydrology calculations poorly referenced in DR. In the report please indicate which retention basin corresponds with each of the 5-yr storm calculation for retention basin sizing calculation sheets.
8. Proposed flows appear to flow away form the southeast-proposed retention basin just west of the proposed basketball court. What water is this basin designed to retain?

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1191 Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
Jose E. Ortiz
Civil Engineer
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1191 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
05/27/2005 HEATHER THRALL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied Please see zoning review comments pertaining to Handicapped access of this proposed project.
05/27/2005 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner


PROJECT: T05CM02087
5910 E. 5th Street
New Church
Site plan
1st Review
Transmittal date: May 26, 2005



COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This project was reviewed in accordance with applicable divisions of the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI), and International Building Code (IBC) 2003 version.

2. Please provide a legal description for the property, per DS 2-02.2.1.2.

3. Please clarify the project address, per DS 2-02.2.1.3, on the revised site plan.

4. List the required zoning setbacks and the distances provided between all buildings, per DS-02-2.1.7. In addition, please amend the plan to show the setback for Sahuara Avenue is taken from the nearest edge of travel lane (per. LUC 3.2.6.5.B).

5. Please clarify if religious services are to be held within the social hall and classrooms. Please note, parking for the site is based upon the gross floor area of all buildings where services are held, thus requiring the classrooms and social hall to be included in parking areas if religious services shall be held in these buildings. Per the LUC, Section 3.3.4. Religious Use parking calculation, one vehicle space is needed per five (5) fixed seats or one space per fifty (50) square feet of floor area of all combined areas of assembly where religious services are held.

6. Non-handicapped parking space typicals should be provided on the revised site plan notes, per DS 2-02.2.1.8. Parking spaces must meet minimum requirements outlined in LUC Section 3.3.7.2. Please provide typicals for parking spaces with and without parking bumpers.

7. The submitted site plan indicates this property is to be developed in two (2) phases. Until such time as development is approved specifically for the second phase, the property must be fenced off from access, as use is not permitted until approved development has occurred. Please provide a fence note around the perimeter of the second phase area on the revised site plan.

8. Per comment 7, the area to be developed in Phase II cannot be utilized for parking and vehicle use for the church until appropriately developed. Due to this development arrangement, a vehicular back up spur is needed on the south side of the proposed social hall (at the end of the phase 1 parking row). Please revise the site plan to ensure a back up spur is provided, meeting standards of DS 3-05.2.2.D.

9. Please dimension the distances from the parking area access lane (PAAL) to all buildings. Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1, a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area inclusive of a four (4) foot sidewalk must be provided between all PAALs and all buildings. Please review and revise the site plan accordingly, examining the southwest of the site around the social hall.

10. Per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2, 2-08.5.0.5.1.A and 2-08.4.4.1.C, a pedestrian sidewalk must be a minimum of 4 feet wide. Where abutting a parking space, should parking bumpers not be provided, a sidewalk must be a minimum of 6'6" wide. Please review the site plan and revise the parking areas as needed, providing dimensions of the pedestrian walk ways abutting parking spaces.

11. Per 2-02.2.1.11, please ensure all points of ingress/egress are dimensioned to meet DS 3-05.2.1.C.1.

12. Per DS 3-05.2.1.C.1, the minimum required width of a PAAL is 24 feet. Please review the site plan along the east side of the social hall and ensure the PAAL is revised to meet this standard.

13. The submitted site plan indicates this project is to be developed into two phases. The bicycle parking calculations provided will be affected by the phasing options. The bicycle parking calculations can be provided either of two ways, with parking requirements added and met for each phase, or provided altogether as a sum of all parking to be provided.

14. Please provide bicycle parking rack and locker details, both types to meet 2-09.6.0. Please ensure the bicycle parking meets requirements of 2-09.4.3 and 2-09.6.1, ensuring the racks are located in such a manner that adjacent vehicle parking spaces shall not interfere with their location.

16. Per DS 2-02.2.1.11, please label all access point widths to meet DS 3-05.2.1.C.

17. Pedestrian access must be continuous throughout the site, at a minimum width of 4 feet, per DS 2-08.3.1 and DS 2-08.5.1.A. Please review the areas depicted on the site plan north and south of the classroom and social hall, ensuring the sidewalk is labeled and dimensioned clearly to meet the stated codes. In addition, a sidewalk is required from Sahuara Avenue to the building areas, per DS 2-08.4.1.

18. Label Handicapped ramps to ensure the ANSI maximum slope ratio of 1:12 are met.

19. Please provide handicapped ramps from the east side handicapped parking areas to the building on the revised site plan, meeting ANSI criteria.

20. Please provide handicapped ramps from the west side handicapped parking areas to the building on the revised site plan, meeting ANSI criteria.


21. The submitted site plan suggests several concrete areas, yet sidewalks are shown with different shading. Please clearly label all sidewalk and concrete areas inclusively on the revised site plan.

22. If applicable, please provide all sign and free-standing lighting locations and dimensions on the revised site plan.

23. Please clarify if the site is currently vacant or has a present use, per DS 2-02.2.1.31.

24. Please provide both the gross and net lot areas in square footage, per DS 2-02.2.2.A.1.

25. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) provided is incorrect, based upon the square footages of the buildings provided on the site plan. Please review and correct this discrepancy.

26. Staff noted the proposed expansion of the classroom north of the depicted classroom on the site plan. Be advised, per comments 12, 17 and 19, the classroom expansion proposed will not allow handicapped ramps, sidewalks and the PAAL areas to meet code requirements. Please review the expansion proposed and revise this building area accordingly. Please ensure any change in total square footage areas are listed on the revised site plan notes and in the FAR and Lot coverage calculations.

27. Please reduce the width - or provide a comparable alternative - to the phasing delineation line.

28. Please reduce the shading of the east parking lot on the revised site plan.

29. It appears a parking space number has been erroneously placed in the area labeled as a drainage basin on the lower left corner of the site plan. Please remove this number, or clarify it's purpose
.
30. It appears a walled in area is provided to the southeast of the social hall. Please label the use of this area, the height of the wall and the width of the possible gated entries on the revised site plan. Please ensure comment 17 is taken into consideration for pedestrian access through and around this area.

31. Please clarify/label the boxed area drawn between the sanctuary and the children's playground, near the west parking lot. Clarify the use, if it is a structure please provide the height.


32. In addition to the current lot coverage information provided for the overall project, please provide lot coverage information broken down in phases on the revised site plan. This information should be given in square footage and percentages.

33. It appears the lot coverage information currently depicted may not be accurate based upon examination of all vehicle and building square footages presented on the site plan. To ensure lot coverage is not exceeded for this development and the calculations can be reviewed accurately, please provide lot coverage information broken down in specific areas (i.e. grids/sectors provided) on the site plan.

34. Staff noted the project is comprised of two lots. To utilize both lots as depicted on the site plan, the lots must be approved for a lot combination through a city zoning review process. If such a combination has been performed, please provide the following: the city approved lot split between parcels 127-13-036F (unaddressed parcel to east) and 127-13-036E (5940 E. 5th), and the city approved lot combination between parcels 127-13-036E (5940 E. 5th) and 127-13-036B (5910 E. 5th). These processes will be required, if not already finished, to develop these parcels as proposed on the submitted site plan.

35. Please note, phasing of a project is only good within two years of approval of development. Should the plan for phase 2 not be submitted and approved within two years, any applicable code changes made will be applied to the new review of the next project phase.

36. Should you have any questions on this review, please contact me via email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov
or at 520-791-5550x1156 to make an office appointment.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608.
06/01/2005 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Revise landscape and NPP plans to include phase lines and fencing if applicable.
06/01/2005 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Phased Development. Where screening for phased development is required:
A. The perimeter screening element along the property lines must be installed during development of the first phase; or
B. Where the undisturbed natural desert is maintained in areas to be developed in subsequent phases, a temporary screen may be erected around the perimeter of the initial phase, subject to the following.
· Temporary screening may be an opaque wood fence or a chain link fence with wood slats.
· Temporary screening must be replaced by a permanent screen if construction of the subsequent phases is not started within two (2) years of the date the original phase received a certificate of occupancy per LUC 3.7.3.5. Revise landscape and NPP plans to include phase lines and fencing if applicable.

2. The Vehicular use area must include post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Provide barricades for all the vehicle use areas including access to undeveloped portions of the site per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1

3. All disturbed grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, re-seeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Indicate treatment for Phase 2

4. A 10' interior landscape border is required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I

5. One canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of the interior landscape borders LUC 3.7.2.4

6. Provide a 5' continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I

7. Any vegetation higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle per LUC 3.7.3.4. Include SVT's on landscape plan.

8. A 5' wall to screen residential zoned properties from vehicle use area is required per LUC 3.7.2-I.

9. Additional comments may apply.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/10/2005 BETH GRANT OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/10/2005 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed