Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM02056
Parcel: 12814136A

Address:
5163 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T05CM02056
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/04/2006 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
04/04/2006 CHRISTY FOREMAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS

DATE: 4/03/06
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM02056
PROJECT NAME: Thoroughbred Nisson
PROJECT ADDRESS: 5163 E. 22nd St.
ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: Fred Fischer Jr.
PROJECT REVIEWER: Christy Foreman



TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CFOREMA1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1) Called Kent Bogatt - Architect to schedule a meeting to discuss coordination of documents.

2) Provide a accurate code analysis for occupancy and provide calculations for sq. footage increase. Clarify occupant load per room / space. section 1004.1.2 and table 1004.1.2 Remember to include existing structure that is to remain. Clarify separated or non-separated per 302.3 mixed occupancies, 302.3.1 non-separated uses, and 302.3.2 separated uses.


2) Section 32-145 Arizona State Board of Technical - Arizona Registrant shall stamp structural calculations, drawings and any revisions made to the documents. Structural drawings need to be stamped and signed by registrant who is providing structural calculations.

3) Provide a copy of approved site plan for reference.

4) Submit for demolition permits for buildings that are shown to be demolished.

5) Accessible routes clarify how grade change occurs between accessible parking to outdoor display area.
Provide detail for accessible ramps per ANSI A117.1 2003 section 405. Provide truncated domes per section 705.5. Notes say to see site plan but this has not been provided.

6) Sht. A-10.4 Detail 1 alcove - Provide dual water fountains to meet ANSI A117.1 2003 section 602.4. Standing hgt. Water fountain still needs to be dimensioned.

7) Clarify clear floor space for all water closets required meet ANSI A117.1 2003 standards all restrooms shown sht. A8-1. Door swing is not allowed in turning radius see section 603.2.3 see dtl 8/8.1 women's toilet.
8) Design load - wind 70 p.s.f. sht C - please justify.

9) Sht. A-7.2 Note 3 - operable parts specify per ANSI A117.1 2003 section 309.4. see Door Notes #3, sht. A-7.2 , 15 lbs. Pressure cannot be on accessible path.

10) Section 1011.3 tactile exit signs? Please designate Elevator / restroom / breakroom tactile signage.

11) Shop drawing submittal for structural steel, conveyor belt, parts shelving, high capacity file cabinets, stairs, and guardrails.

12) Address foundation next to existing structure on east elevation. Provide calculations and details.

13) Clarify architectural & structural drawings have been completed per the 2003 IBC. Clarify live loads used are per table 1607.1 IBC 2003. Clarify loads have been considered for high capacity file cabinets, storage/parts shelving, and HVAC equipment.

14) Mezzanine framing diagram need further clarification of framing members and diagram for all members FB-1 through FB-7. FB-4, FB-5, FB-6 drwgs and calculations conflict FB-7 not shown on structural calculation diagram.

15) Provide a diagram in structural calculations to clarify location of columns that have been justified. See page 62-64 of structural calculations.

16) Sht. S-0.1 specifies columns C-1 through C-5 column design structural calculation only justifies two column sizes. There is no F-6 on footing schedule 4/S3.1 reinforcing not on schedule 4/S3.1 for F-4 and F-5. F-4, F-5, and F-1 sizing not per calculations. Need to add 8" and 12" wall footing requirements on schedule and provide justification for reinforcement.

17) General notes for structural still missing.

18) Clarify location of masonry wall in reference to structural calculations provided. Provide diagram.

19) Structural calculations need to provide a complete seismic and wind analysis. Response does not answer request.

20) Provide diagrams showing loads, shear wall calculated therefore can relate location to structural drawings. Response does not answer request.

21) Provide a list of special inspections per chapt. 17, 2003 IBC. Referred to sht. S1.1 that is missing.
04/04/2006 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied needs to show location/method of connection to public sewer. needs ww/iwc review & approval. (Tom Tomchak 579-5771) needs WW 8th floor credit evaluation for bldg demo.
04/04/2006 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Second request. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top units. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2000.
2. Coordinate the scheduled outside airflow rates (sheet M-1.1) for the rooftop units with the ventilation calculations shown on sheet M-2.1.
3. Revise the ventilation calculations for RTU-3; the unit serves more than just the hospitality area. Provide justification for the number of people occupying the hospitality area. Reference Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2000.
4. Revise the ventilation calculations for RTU-6 to include the common ventilation of spaces having different ventilation requirements. Reference Section 403.3.2, IMC 2000.
5. Revise the ventilation calculations for the service bays and the service reception per Table 403.3, which calls for 1.5 CFM per square foot for automotive service stations and repair garages. Reference Section 403.3, IMC 2000.
6. Second request. Provide information to show that the elevator machine room does not require an independent venting or air conditioning system to prevent overheating of the elevator equipment. Reference Section 3006, IBC 2003.
7. Provide information to show that the design of the condensate drain traps for the rooftop units (detail D28/P-3.1) is in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Reference Section 304.1, IMC 2000.
04/04/2006 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Per Jim Egan's comments for previous submittals...
Provide complete fire sprinkler system design criteria on plan
1. Design Standard to be used.
2. Hazard classifications
3. Minimum design densities and areas of operation.
4. Water Supply information Static__Psi Residual__psi
Flow__gpm.
04/04/2006 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. EWH-1 appears 3-times on Sheet P2.0, and EWH-2 appears twice. Yet there is power for only 1 WH in Electrical Plans.
2. EWH-1 and EWH-2 power requirements Sheet P2.0 call for 208V. The WH on Electrical plans provides 480V. Please coordinate with Plumbing and clarify.
3. OCPD for Water Heater on Ckt PH3-20,22,24 is 30A. Please provide a 25A CB. Reference NEC 422.11 (E) (3), and 240.6 (A).
4. On the Outdoor Lighting Code computation, please note that there are 12 fixtures "NL", not 10. It appears that the total lumens is 960,000, which exceeds the allowable 870,000.
5. Please address motor disconnecting means for the Door Lift and Conveyer on Keynotes 5 and 6 Sheet E-4. Reference NEC 430 Part IX.
6. Clarify "LVR" on Sheet E-4 Keynote 15.
7. Keynote 2 Sheet E-7, which includes RTU-5 and provides for a 25AF, may not work for this unit, which is specified on Sheet M-1.1 as MCA 29.4 and MOCP 35. Please re-evaluate the panel loading for this unit Sheet E-8 as necessary.
8. Keynote 9 Sheet E-7, has no note. Is attached to RTU-5. Please clarify.
9. Keynote 2 Sheet E-7, which is attached to RTU-2 and provides for a 25AF, may not work for this unit, which is specified on Sheet M-1.1 as MCA 56.5 and MOCP 70. Please re-evaluate the panel loading for this unit Sheet E-8 as necessary.
10. Keynote 2 Sheet E-7, which includes RTU-4 and provides for a 25AF, may not work for this unit, which is specified on Sheet M-1.1 as MCA 36.1 and MOCP 45. Please re-evaluate the panel loading for this unit Sheet E-8 as necessary.
11. Keynote 2 Sheet E-7, which includes RTU-3 and provides for a 25AF, may not work for this unit, which is specified on Sheet M-1.1 as MCA 29.4 and MOCP 35. Please re-evaluate the panel loading for this unit Sheet E-8 as necessary.
12. Keynote 2 Sheet E-7, which is attached to RTU-1 and provides for a 25AF, may not work for this unit, which is specified on Sheet M-1.1 as MCA 56.5 and MOCP 70. Please re-evaluate the panel loading for this unit Sheet E-8 as necessary.
13. Please re-evaluate feeders for RTUs noted on comments above.
14. Sheet E-9 Keynote 6 please indicate lighting fixture type for elevator equipment room.
15. Please locate the elevator equipment room light and receptacle on the same, dedicated branch circuit. Reference NEC 620.23 (A).
16. For the 75 KVA X'FMRs, please change the #4 to #2 in Keynotes 11 and 12 on the Single Line Diagram. Reference NEC Table 250.66 footnote a.
17. Please specify the N-G bond at the service entrance as 250 MCM. Reference NEC 250.28 (D).
18. Please specify the distance between T1 and PL1 as not to exceed 10'. Reference NEC 240.21 (C) (2).
19. Specify pole height for the exterior fixtures. Provide finished pole and foundation detail with current submittal, unless otherwise arranged through the Structural Plans Examiner (reference Detail 4 Sheet E-9). Provide calculations for both pole and foundation, sealed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Arizona for any pole exceeding 20' in height.
20. NEC Article 511 pertains to the service and repair rooms and adjacent areas, unless ventilation complies with the requirements of 511.3 (B) (1) Exception and 511.3 (B) (4). Mechanical Plans Examiner Bob Sherry will be consulted by the Electrical Plans Examiner in this regard. Reference Mechanical Comment #5, last submittal.
04/05/2006 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Second request. Provide site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
2. The submitted pipe-sizing schedule (sheet P-3.2) calls for a maximum pressure drop of 3 PSI per 100 feet with types K and L copper. The maximum flow rates called out on the schedule, however, will result in pressure drops significantly in excess of 3 PSI/100 feet even for the type L copper. Correct the pipe-sizing schedule as required.
3. Provide listing information for the reduced pressure backflow preventer upon which the water pressure calculations have been based. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
4. One of the specified fixtures (Haws model 7360BT emergency eyewash) requires a minimum pressure greater than the 15-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference Section 608.1, UPC 1994.
5. Second request. Coordinate the plumbing fixture layout (sheet P-2.0) with the fixtures shown on sheet A-2.1. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.The fixture layout in room 106 is not the same on both sheets. The architect calls out an "emergency drench shower/eyewash" but the plumbing design specifies only an eyewash. The architect shows a utility sink in room 143 but the plumbing design does not show this sink. The architect also shows a floor drain in room 142 but the plumbing design does not show this fixture.
6. Second request. Provide site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
7. Based on the provided waste and vent isometric, upper terminal cleanouts are required (Section 707.4, UPC 1994), each fixture requires a vent (Sections 901.0 and 910.1, UPC 1994) and, the emergency eyewash (emergency shower?) is not connected to the building drain system (Section 304.0, UPC 1994). Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
8. Second request. Provide a schedule of waste fixture units for all plumbing fixtures using the values shown in table 7-3, UPC 1994. Include the total number of each fixture being installed. Reference Section 703.1, UPC 1994. (Note: the domestic water connected load tabulation shown on sheet P-1 is incomplete and does not use fixture units from the 1994 UPC.)
9. The trench drain located in the service bay still shows a trap at the trench discharge (sheet P2.0, detail D4/P-3.0, and the DWV isometric on sheet P-3.2). This trap would not be self-cleaning (Section 1003.1, UPC 1994) and would prevent sand from reaching the intended interceptor. The drain piping from the trench drain located in the service reception has inadequate cleanouts (approximately 170 feet between cleanouts). The pipes running between the trench drains and the sand/oil separator are essentially closed troughs for slurry flow and should be designed accordingly to prevent drainage problems. The trap shown in detail D27/P-3.1is not required because the interceptor forms the trap.
10. Provide the listing information for the 2-way cleanouts located before and after the sand/oil separator. Reference Section 707.6, UPC 1994.
11. If the size of the natural gas piping was determined using Table 12-3, UPC 1994, the branches to HV-1, HV-2, and RTU-1 are undersized; the pipe segment from the first floor to the second floor is undersized (780+480=1260, not 1160); and the main piping shown as 3-1/2" should be 4". If Table 12-3 was not used to size the gas piping, provide calculations to show that the pipe sizes are correct.
12. Second request. Show the location of the gas meter along with the developed length from the meter to the building. If the Contractor decides to use medium pressure gas, a revision to the plans and the permit will be required. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
13. Second request. Provide a design for the drainage of the roof located north of column line 7. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
14. Second request. Clarify the design of the roof drain for the entry element shown on sheet A-15.1. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 1994.
15. Revise detail D17/P-3.1 to comply with Section 313.3, UPC 1994.
16. Revise detail D23/P-3.1 to include backflow protection. If the beverage dispenser includes carbonated water, a reduced pressure principle backflow preventer and no copper downstream of the backflow assembly will be required. Reference Sections 602.4 and 603.3.12, UPC 1994.
17. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference Section 414.1, UPC 2003 and Section 804.3, IECC 2003.
18. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference Section 804.3, IECC 2003.
19. Provide listing information for the shower for room 142. Show how the unit complies with Sections 410.3, 410.4, and 410.7, UPC 1994.
04/26/2006 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/03/2006 GBONILL1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
05/03/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed