Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T05CM01453
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2006 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1. Lighting Power Budget calculations per the 2000 IECC shall be based on 0.6 W/SF. Reference Table 805.4.2, Industrial/Commercial Storage. 2. Fault calculations, appear to use incorrect impedance values. Reference our conversation of January 5, 2006. 3. Please note that the Owner may not occupy this building if it is to be considered as a shell. This is not an electrical issue, but needs to be clarified among the Building Plans Examiner, Architect, and Owner. |
| 12/21/2005 | SEPTIC APPROVAL | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review | septic has not been reviewed yet. |
| 12/21/2005 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 12/21/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/21/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 4. The water calculations show a developed pipe length of 297 feet but drawing P-1.0 shows a developed pipe length of approximately 264 feet from the SOV to the furthest outlet. In addition, Keynote 19 (sheet C-1.0) calls out 179 feet of pipe from the water meter to within five feet of the building. Recalculate the equivalent pipe length and the permissible friction loss. Revise pipe sizes as required. Reference Section A3, UPC 1994. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/10/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |