Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM01428
Parcel: 140290480

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T05CM01428
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/19/2005 CHRISTY FOREMAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
06/03/2005 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top units. Reference Section 302.1, IMC 2000.
2. Show that the restroom ventilation complies with Section 403.3, IMC 2000 (see the revised architectural drawing).
06/03/2005 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate the plumbing schedule, plans, and riser diagrams with the revised architectural plans (see the revised restrooms, sheet A1.1).
2. Revise the water calculations to show the highest outlet is on the roof of the building, not 7 feet above the water meter.
3. Provide a backflow preventer for the cooling tower make-up. Reference Section 603.0, UPC 1994.
4. Verify that the effluent of the equipment drains (e.g. air compressor) complies with Section 307.0, UPC 1994.
5. Revise the size of the natural gas pipe from the meter to the first branch per Table 12-3, UPC 1994. Include the loads for all equipment and the developed pipe lengths on the plans.
06/16/2005 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. Sheets E1.1 and E2.1 show Panel B in two different locations. Please clarify.
2. Please specify that the disconnect on the load side of the new transformer is to be located such that the secondary does not exceed 10'.
3. It appears that A-1,3,5 should be 792 VA per phase, A-7 should be 1656 VA, and A-42 should be 7928. Please correct as appropriate and revise totals.
4. Estimated load for Panel I is 350A per panel schedule and load calculations. Panel is listed at 225A. Please clarify.
5. Load Calculation Note addresses New Panel N. No such panel n plans or in load calculations.
6. Please provide feeder size for Panel A.
7. Please clarify Ckt B-3, with Equipment 1 & 2. Equipment Schedule lists Eq 1 as a 15 HP 120/1 load. NEC Table 430.148 does not go up as high as 15 HP for 120V single phase, and for 10 HP it maxes out at 100A. This would not be consistent with the 20AF or the 40A feeder.
8. Ckt B-8,10,12 has a 30.8A load on a 20A feeder. (CB is 20A) Pls clarify.
9. Equipment 41 at 13.8A, should have an OCPD no greater than 25A. (13.8) (1.5) = 20.7. Can round up to 25, not 30.
10. On Panel A, Ckt 29 is listed with a 40/30 CB. Note that this feeds a ½ HP 1-phase load.
11. Please correct the designation "A-31,32" to read "A-31,33" on Power Plan.
12. A-31,33 is on a 40A CB, but #12 conductor.
13. A-9,11,13 is a 3-P feeder per Panel Schedule but 1-phase per Equipment Schedule. Pls clarify.
14. Equipment 31 is a 19A load on a 2AF.
15. Equipment 31 is a single phase load per Equipment and Panel Schedule, but on a 3-pole disconnect. Pls clarify.
16. Equipment 31 at 19 A would have 2280 VA, not 1127. Coordinate w/Comment #3 above.
17. Equipment 35 is a single phase load per Equipment and Panel Schedule, but on a 3-pole disconnect. Pls clarify.
18. Equipment 39 is a single phase load per Equipment and Panel Schedule, but on a 3-pole disconnect. Pls clarify.
19. In the "Amps" column on the Equipment Schedule, there are several "1A" loads for items which could not be 1A. Review assumed that the remaining column took precedence.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/21/2005 GBONILL1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/21/2005 GBONILL1 REJECT SHELF Completed