Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM01364
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/12/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site/Grading Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. D.S. 2-05.2.1.C Correct and revise Sheet 2. 3. Indicate contour intervals along with north arrow and scale. This should be placed together. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1 4. Indicate all existing buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E 5. Indicate existing sight visibility triangles on the upper northeast corner of the site. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 6. If applicable, indicate location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 7. Delineate limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation. Indicate WSE and Flood limit symbols in Legend. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.15 8. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.17 9. Dimensioned right-of-way on Miller Avenue on Sheet 2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 10. If applicable, indicate all easements of record to be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines for Gardner Lane and Miller Ave.\. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 12. Indicate existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number. Refer to comment #3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.23 Indicate graphically contour elevations mid through contour lines to determine FFE for proposed structures. 13. Indicate refuse container location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned. Dimension refuse enclosure detail. 14. A Floodplain Use Permit required. 15. Indicate adjacent Zones. 16. Sheet 1; remove SVT dimensions. 17. Sheet 2; reposition text above leader extension. 18. Indicate a dimensioned detail of Detention/Retention Basin. 19. Differential Grading-Section 13.1 This criteria applies to all non-residential developments, and all residential developments with lots that are less than 24,000 square feet, that are adjacent to an existing residential development or residentially zoned property (excepting multifamily developments greater than single story), or un-subdivided non-commercial property. |
| 04/18/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see Zoning Review comments |
| 04/18/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The site plan provided on both sheets one (1) and two (2) do not scale properly. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1) 2. List the gross floor area for each suite on sheet 2. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 3. Note the maximum proposed building height. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6) 4. Vehicle parking ratio for "Commercial Storage" is based on a ratio of 1 space per 5,000 square feet of GFA. The parking calculation provided shows a ratio of one (1) space per 2,000 square feet GFA. Correct or revise the vehicle parking calculation to reflect the correct land use or parking ratio required. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8) 5. Under the bicycle parking calculation, 68 spaces are used to determine the ratio and the vehicle parking note indicates a total number of 61 spaces provided. Revise as required. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) 6. Indicate the location of the proposed Class 1 bicycle parking spaces on the plan and provide a fully dimensioned detail which complies with D.S. 2-09. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9) 7. If applicable, provide the location, type, size, and height of existing and/or proposed free standing sign, billboard, and outdoor lighting on the site plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13) (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25) 8. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5.2, one (1) 12' x 55' loading zone is required for proposed GFA of 19,860 square feet. Revise calculation and loading space size on plan. Loading spaces shall be 55 feet in length. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14) (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5) 9. Label and dimension complete right-of-way along both streets bounding the property. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19) 10. If applicable, all existing and proposed easements must be shown on the plan including width, type, and recording docket and page reference. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20) 11. Provide the FAR calculation (maximum allowed and proposed) on the plan. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3) 12. Are the ramps located in front of Suite 105, 109, and 111 necessary? Please remove if not required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person. |
| 04/19/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Site and grading plans indicate a 30" screen wall the landscape plan identifies a 5' screen wall. The required screen along a street frontage for vehicular use area may be lowered to 30" if the site is located across the street from nonresidential uses or unimproved, non-residentially zoned parcels per LUC 3.7.3.6.A. Revise plans as necessary and incorporate screen along the entire street frontages excluding ingress or egress on landscape plan. 2. All plants designated to be preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Divert wall to accommodate canopy of preserve in place tree along Miller Ave. Add note to landscape plan: Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius per DS 2-15.6.A 3. Submit a NPPO plan or application for exception stating that: Protected Native Plants will not be substantially impacted by development on this site. |
| 04/20/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) All plants designated to be preserved-in-place shall be retained at their existing grade during and after construction. Divert wall to accommodate canopy of preserve in place tree along Miller Ave. Add note to landscape plan: Preservation fencing per DS 2-06. Figure 1 is required to be installed beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius per DS 2-15.6.A 2) Submit a NPPO plan or application for exception stating that: Protected Native Plants will not be substantially impacted by development on this site. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |