Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T05CM01289
Parcel: 116010840

Review Status: Active

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T05CM01289
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/27/2005 LINDA BUCZYNSKI ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1106 OR EMAIL AT Linda.Buczynski@tucsonaz.gov
IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1. This is an incomplete review. Product information on BP Panels not legible.
2. Voltage of panels is indicated as 34.5A on connection diagram, which is inconsistent with the BP 3160. Please clarify and provide consistent information.
3. Pages 11 and 12 are not legible. Can not serve as permitted construction drawing.
4. "Address overcurrent requirements per NEC 690.8 and 690.9." THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE FIRST SUBMITTAL. Not clear from any of the information provided what shall serve as the OCPD or its' place in the wiring.
5. "Address Disconnecting Means per NEC 690 Part III." THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE FIRST AND SECOND SUBMITTAL.
6. Page 3 calls for Suntie Trace inverter. Sheets 8 and 9 refer to the Fronius inverter. Sheet 12 refers to the Suntie inverter. Sheet 12A refers to the Fronuis inverter. Please clarify and provide consistent information.
7. Clarify cable/conductor/conduit from panels on garage.
8. "BP sells an extension cable, composed of USE-2, to allow connection of module cables to the row boxes. Cable and terminations have been assembled in factories under UL approval. Please specify this method of connection." THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE FIRST AND SECOND SUBMITTALS. This needs to be specified from the last module to the box, not just between panels.
9. "Please note that plans and specifications prepared by a registrant shall be issued under his seal. Some of the drawings appear to have been generated by a Registrant, Bill Henry of TEP." THIS COMMENT WAS MADE ON THE FIRST AND SECOND SUBMITTALS. If the connection diagram is to be considered as a part of the submittal, it should not be generated by a Registrant without proper seal.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/28/2005 ANGIE SHOFFSTALL REJECT SHELF RECEIVED