Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T05CM00955
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2005 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/21/2005 | WILDAN | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | March 18, 2005 City of Tucson Development Services Department Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: PENNINGTON GARAGE OFFICE TI – 1st REVIEW CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T05CM00955 WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-5002 The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter reflects comments, which need to be addressed by a written response to each, indicating action taken. In order to facilitate a shorter back-check time, we request that you please provide two (2) sets revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes with appropriate revision number, revision date, and “cloud bubbles.” Please replace all revised drawing sheets, in all sets of plans, before returning to Willdan for the follow-up plan review. Please return redline drawings with your re-submittal. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Martin Haeberle. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms B/A3 102 IB 5770 Yes Yes GENERAL COMMENTS: This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2003 IBC, 1997 UAC, 2000 IMC, 2000 IECC, 2002 NEC codes with local modifications, and the 1994 UPC with State of Arizona Amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet IT-2 Plans indicate the building is a five-story structure. It is actually a seven-story structure. Revise plan data sheet. Reference section 106.1 IBC. The type of construction and occupancy type appear to be mislabeled. Please clarify. Reference section106.1 IBC. Sheet IA-1 The egress from the conference room to the patio reduces the landing area by more than 42 inches. Reference section 1010.6 IBC. Revise4 plan. The floor plan keynote is missing on plans. Please clarify. Reference section 106.1 IBC. Sheet IA-6 is missing from the submittal documents. See references on floor plan. Please provide missing sheets. Reference section 106.1 IBC. The patio area appears to have an occupant load exceeding 50 requiring the exit doors to swing in the direction of travel. Reference section 1008 IBC. Clarify occupancy and revise plans accordingly. Sheet IA-3 The room finish schedule does not reflect the required ceramic tile finish as shown in the restroom elevations. Please revise. Reference section 1210.2 IBC. Sheet IA-4 The opening at the base of the guardrail, where serving areas over 30 inches above grade, may not allow a 4 inches sphere to pass. Reference section 1012.1 IBC. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted PLUMBING COMMENTS: Sheet P1.1 Provide a water piping isometric with water pipe sizing calculations per City of Tucson submittal requirements. Sheet P2.1 The water heater detail specifies the T&P relief line to terminate per the plans. Unable to determine termination from the plans. Please clarify. Reference section 608.5 UPC. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Sheet E-2 Exterior exit illumination with emergency power is required at the exits. Reference section 1006.3 IBC revise plan. Sheet E-2 The smoke detectors are to be installed on the return air of the HVAC equipment. See mechanical plans. Revise annotations. Reference section 106.1 IBC. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: Energy compliance certificate needs to indicate the design conditions as amended by the City of Tucson. See City of Tucson amendments to the IECC. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: See Architectural comments Sincerely, WILLDAN Martin A. Haeberle, C.B.O. Deputy Building Official MAH/sb |
| 03/21/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/21/2005 | ASHOFFS1 | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Completed | March 18, 2005 City of Tucson Development Services Department Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: PENNINGTON GARAGE OFFICE TI – 1st REVIEW CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T05CM00955 WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-5002 The initial review for the above project has been completed. This letter reflects comments, which need to be addressed by a written response to each, indicating action taken. In order to facilitate a shorter back-check time, we request that you please provide two (2) sets revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes with appropriate revision number, revision date, and “cloud bubbles.” Please replace all revised drawing sheets, in all sets of plans, before returning to Willdan for the follow-up plan review. Please return redline drawings with your re-submittal. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiner Martin Haeberle. Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms B/A3 102 IB 5770 Yes Yes GENERAL COMMENTS: This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2003 IBC, 1997 UAC, 2000 IMC, 2000 IECC, 2002 NEC codes with local modifications, and the 1994 UPC with State of Arizona Amendments. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet IT-2 Plans indicate the building is a five-story structure. It is actually a seven-story structure. Revise plan data sheet. Reference section 106.1 IBC. The type of construction and occupancy type appear to be mislabeled. Please clarify. Reference section106.1 IBC. Sheet IA-1 The egress from the conference room to the patio reduces the landing area by more than 42 inches. Reference section 1010.6 IBC. Revise4 plan. The floor plan keynote is missing on plans. Please clarify. Reference section 106.1 IBC. Sheet IA-6 is missing from the submittal documents. See references on floor plan. Please provide missing sheets. Reference section 106.1 IBC. The patio area appears to have an occupant load exceeding 50 requiring the exit doors to swing in the direction of travel. Reference section 1008 IBC. Clarify occupancy and revise plans accordingly. Sheet IA-3 The room finish schedule does not reflect the required ceramic tile finish as shown in the restroom elevations. Please revise. Reference section 1210.2 IBC. Sheet IA-4 The opening at the base of the guardrail, where serving areas over 30 inches above grade, may not allow a 4 inches sphere to pass. Reference section 1012.1 IBC. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted PLUMBING COMMENTS: Sheet P1.1 Provide a water piping isometric with water pipe sizing calculations per City of Tucson submittal requirements. Sheet P2.1 The water heater detail specifies the T&P relief line to terminate per the plans. Unable to determine termination from the plans. Please clarify. Reference section 608.5 UPC. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Sheet E-2 Exterior exit illumination with emergency power is required at the exits. Reference section 1006.3 IBC revise plan. Sheet E-2 The smoke detectors are to be installed on the return air of the HVAC equipment. See mechanical plans. Revise annotations. Reference section 106.1 IBC. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: Energy compliance certificate needs to indicate the design conditions as amended by the City of Tucson. See City of Tucson amendments to the IECC. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: See Architectural comments Sincerely, WILLDAN Martin A. Haeberle, C.B.O. Deputy Building Official MAH/sb |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/22/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/22/2005 | ANGIE SHOFFSTALL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |