Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T05CM00655
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/15/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/15/2005 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/15/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/15/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/15/2005 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/15/2005 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | t05cm00656 DENIED 2/15/05 1. Fill in load on panel schedule for Ckts D-39 and D-41. 2. Add 25% for continuous load for RTU #1 to Panel D load calculation, and to service load calculation. 3. City of Tucson does not allow the use of the "Up-Over-Down" method to attenuate fault current. Either fully rate Panel D, or specify its "downstream" AFC rating such the the note calling for series rating covers any and all requirements to deal with the AFC at the new Panel. 4. In the service load calculations, please revisit the counting of 250 VA for 88 lighting fixtures. This appears to be a high amount for a fixture type which was in such number at a location such as this. 5. Correct Keynote #2 on Sheet E-1, such that only the panel intended for relocation is indeed relocated. |
| 02/15/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/16/2005 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |