Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T05CM00439
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/07/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The accessible route from the access aisle may not be located in the vehicular use area. Provide the required accessible route using the pedestrian sidewalk north of the access aisle. Provide adequate ramp and detail. 2. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person. |
| 06/07/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The accessible route from the access aisle may not be located in the vehicular use area. Provide the required accessible route using the pedestrian sidewalk north of the access aisle. Provide adequate ramp and detail. 2. Review of this plan by the Zoning Review Section may be done over the counter. Please contact Dan Castro to set an appointment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person. |
| 06/15/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Plantings shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review. Remove Cottonwood (Populus fremontii) from possible historic plantings upon inspection of surrounding area no living species could be identified. Arizona Ash (Fraxinus velutina) is acceptable. 2. Provide wall sections including heights, material(s) and finished grades per DS 2-07.2.2.3. ALL required screening must be provided on the developing property or a joint-use agreement must be provided. Verify if existing wall is located on site or provide appropriate documentation. 3. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Two Native Mesquites (Prosopis velutina) are locate in the southwester corner of property, indicate on landscape plan or on application for exception if trees are to remain in place, transplanted, or removed from site. If applicable provide proper mitigation for trees per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 06/16/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Two Native Mesquites (Prosopis velutina) are locate in the southwester corner of property, indicate on landscape plan or on the application for exception if trees are to remain in place, transplanted, or removed from site. If applicable provide proper mitigation for trees per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 06/20/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | All comments have been adequately addressed. Approval of the site plan may be provided over the counter upon completion of the following items: 1. Note "DSMR 05-17" approval number for wall, gate, and solid waste service area within the SVT, in an appropriate location within the plan set. 2. Revise titling of detail D-sheet a1 as appropriate. 3. Provide notation in detail B - sheet a1 that curb access ramps should be constructed with truncated domes. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |