Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T05CM00365
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/14/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Identify on landscape / site and grading plans the 30" wall along 6th Ave per LUC 3.7.2-I 2. Landscaping is required along retention basin side slopes, bottom and periphery. Plant materials used in basins shall withstand periodic inundation per DS 10.01. Revise landscape plan to include basin(s) treatment. 3. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each (10) vehicle parking space and, Every space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Comment not addressed from previous review. 4. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0 Identify by genius and species and the locations of all the plants to remain on site. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site and Application for Exception are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 06/15/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.0 Identify by genius and species and the locations of all the plants to remain on site. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site and Application for Exception are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 06/15/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Previous site plan comment #'s 4 and 9 have not been fully addressed. The following two comments must be fully addressed prior to site plan approval: (1) Depict a minimum of 18' unobstructed radii at intersecting PAAL's for solid waste vehicle maneuverability, on the plan (please note that written approval by Environmental Services Dept. for deviation from Development Standard guidelines does not mean approval may be granted by this office without first having obtained a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) approval. (2) Depict and provide roof downspouts with corresponding scuppers for roof/canopy drainage conveyance under the sidewalk on the north side of the propsed structure. The drainange report meets the minimum requirement for site plan approval. |
| 06/16/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Joaquin Rincon 515 E. Grant Road #141-226 Tucson, AZ 85705 (520) 406-0789 FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner Development Services Dept. PROJECT: T05CM00365 El Sinaloense 4738 S. Sixth Ave Site Plan Review (2nd review) TRANSMITTAL: June 16, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Based on Assessor's records, the subject property is made up of two lots, which must be combined into one. Provide lot combination documents including Assessor's lot combo docs and notarized/recorded covenant. Revise property legal description to also include all portions of the property so that the exact location of the site can be determined. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. Because bicycle parking is located away from the street frontage, directional signage must be used to show bicyclists where bike parking is located. Add the location of directional signage to the drawing. DS 2-09.5.1 3. Because Sixth Avenue is a designated Major Street and Route, dimension the future MS&R ½ right-of-way width on the plan along with the dimension from center line to future curb location. Note: based on the MS&R Plan, 6th Avenue has a future full right-of-way width of 120 feet. Revise site plan as necessary. Dimension the proposed building setback from back of future curb location along 6th Avenue. The required MS&R street perimeter yard setback is the greater of twenty-one (21) feet or the height of exterior building wall measured from back of future curb. Revise site plan to show future sight visibility triangles correctly based on future curb location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 & .21 LUC 3.2.6.5 4. Fill in the docket and page information for the 20-foot easement along the west property line. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 5. Provide the maximum slope of the handicap ramp and aisle in the h/c parking detail. ANS/IBC 6. The site plan drawing shows that the crosswalk incorrectly ends up running into the h/c parking space rather than the access aisle. Revise to be consistent with the detail which shows that it will meet up with the h/c access aisle rather than the parking space. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 06/16/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2005 | KMEDINA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |