Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM00161
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit correct code review checklist based on 2003 IBC. 2. Indicate required fire rating of north and east exterior walls of new addition. |
| 02/01/2005 | Joseph Linville | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit previously approved site and landscape plans. Show all existing landscape plantings and improvements on the plans. DS 2-07. |
| 02/01/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception per 2002 PC aerial photo. |
| 02/02/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Refer to Zoning review comments. |
| 02/02/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on a 23.94% building area expansion resulting in a full code compliance review of the expansion area only. 1. When the percent building area expansion is less than 25%, a copy of the most recent stamped approved site plan is required to be submitted along with the proposed site plan. The set of drawings submitted with this site plan is not a site plan but a tenant improvement plan. Submit a copy of the last approved site plan with the resubmittal of this site plan. Additional site review comments may be forthcoming if the last approved site plan differs from the site plan provided. 2. Correct the township, range, and section listed undeer the location map on sheet T.1. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4) 3. List the existing and proposed land use as it is listed in the Land Use Code Sec2.5.3.2.A. Include the development designator and if applicable, "subject to" section/s. Additional comments may be forthcoming if the land use classification differs from retail. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31) 4. Per the MS&R, Valencia is designated as having a total right-of-way of 150 feet (75' ½ right-of-way). The site plan shows a right-of-way of 60 feet, well short of the 75' half required. Label and dimension correct right-of-way dimensions for both Valencia and Missiondale. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19) 5. Label the zoning classification for the property located to the north. (D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28) 6. Add the floor area ratio (FAR) calculation. (D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3). 7. All requested changes must be made to the site and landscape plans. (D.S. 2-07.2.1.A) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. An appointment is required to discuss these comments in person. DC I:/siteplan2005/T05CM00161a.doc |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/11/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/11/2005 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |