Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T05CM00050
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/14/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Indicate contour intervals along with north arrow and scale. This should be placed together. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.1 3. Indicate all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts and sidewalk scuppers. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." D.S. 2-08.3.1 & 4.1.E 4. Indicate if street is Public or Private. Alley access is not allowed. Closed unused driveways. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 5. Dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 6. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 7. Submit the drawing faxed to John Clark for refuse enclosure acceptance. 8. Indicate Zones for the adjacent parcels. 9. Correct Datum to read NAVD 88. |
| 05/19/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property and a signed statement (Application for Exception) indicating that Protected Native Plants are not impacted on the subject site. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C. Include the locations of preserve in place plants on landscape plan. |
| 05/20/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 06/06/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: David Rivera Planning Technician Principal Planner PROJECT: T05CM00050 309 West Elm Street Four-unit apartment complex for each parcel TRANSMITTAL: June 6, 2005 2nd Review w/ new layout DUE DATE: June 6, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. This review is for two four-unit apartments building located on to adjacent lots that functions as one site. This site is in the C-1 zone with C-1 zoning to the north and south, C-3 zoning to the west and R-2 zoning to the east. The residential Development Designator is "O" in the C-1 zone. LUC Sec 2.5.3.2.E.1, & LUC Sec 3.2.3.1.D 2. Provide the cross access agreement for the easement and the docket and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2005 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |