Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Stopped
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T05CM00047
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Stopped
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/14/2005 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Indicate fire rating/opening protection required and provided for South exterior wall located adjacent to property line. |
| 03/01/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T05CM00047 5702 S. Park Avenue Site Plan TRANSMITTAL: 03/03/05 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This development is comprised of two separate lots. If this development is to function as one development both legal descriptions must be listed. Please review the legal description text block and correctly revise the legal description as the property now exists and as referenced by the Pima County Assessor's records. Also please correct the typo for the word Assessor's. DS 2-02.2.1A.2 2. Please add the addresses of both parcels. DS 2-02.2.1.A.3 3. The location map must be drawn at a scale of 3"= 1 mile and should cover a one mile area. The location map on the plan does not cover one mile. The following items must be added to the location map. Additional street names, section corners, and subject property location must be shown and labeled. DS 2-02.2.1.A.4 4. It is not clear from the drawing, which buildings are new and which ones are existing and which ones will be demolished. Per the 2002 aerial it appears that there is more than one building on the lot addressed 5710 S. Park Avenue. The symbol in the legend for existing buildings to remain has been applied to the one building on lot 5702 and on one building on lot 5710. What has not been depicted on the plan is the additional building on lot 5710. The building in question is towards the Park Avenue frontage of the property. Please show the building on the plan and label as to be demolished. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 5. Please address the following items related to vehicular use areas. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 and DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 a. Parking spaces are not allowed within the sight visibility triangle as shown along the north driveway entrance. Relocate the handicapped parking space out of the SVT. b. All PAAL areas must be labeled and dimensioned. Per the plan and keynotes it appears that 75% of the combined lot area is to be paved. Clarify how all the paved area is to be used. If the area is for vehicular use please define, label and dimension the PAALs. c. A back-up spur is required at the row of parking stalls. The back-up spur must be 3 feet in depth extruded curbing to keep vehicles out of the detention basin or landscape areas. The extruded curbing is required in all vehicular use areas where the pavement is abuts a landscape buffer or detention basin. See development standards 3-05 for more information on vehicular use area requirements. d. The parking space in the SVT will be lost unless relocated elsewhere on the site. The parking space within the SVT is the handicapped space and unless relocated elsewhere one of the other parking spaces must be designated as the handicapped space. In addition the handicapped space must be a van accessible space which includes an 8-foot wide access aisle. Revise the drawing as required. If the space in the SVT is not relocated elsewhere on the site adjust the parking calculation to reflect the number of parking spaces that will be provided including handicapped spaces. 6. Draw, label and dimension all required SVT's. See redlines. No object between 30 inches and 6 feet may be placed within a SVT. A portion of the existing wall along the south property line is within SVT. The portion of the wall within the SVT must be lowered to 30 inches. Wrought iron may be placed on top of the 30-inch wall as long as the pickets are 12 inches apart. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 7. The pedestrian circulation has not been depicted, labeled, or dimensioned on the drawing. Per DS 2-08.4.1, a sidewalk is required from any street on which the property has frontage. The sidewalk must connect to the onsite pedestrian circulation path and accessible route. The sidewalk must be a minimum of 4 feet in width, physically separated from the vehicular use areas (PAALs), and constructed of concrete. The continuous circulation path may be continued with a painted crosswalk when crossing a PAAL. Also where a PAAL is adjacent to a building a five-foot pedestrian refuge with a four-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required. Defining and providing barriers for the PAALs may make a difference in the requirement for the pedestrian refuge areas. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revised plan and response comments. Please keep in mind that the accessible route must have handicapped access ramps when transitioning a route from a sidewalk to a crosswalk. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 8. Please dimension the width of the PAAL area between the loading zone and the parking stall on the north side of the PAAL. See redlines. Demonstrate on the plan how the maneuverability into and out of the loading zone accomplished. The onsite circulation path must be provided to the loading zone. If the loading is to service both buildings the loading zone should be relocated to an area that is convenient to both buildings and is provided with a pedestrian circulation to each building. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this requirement based on the revised plan and response comments. DS 2-02.2.1.A.14 9. Drexel Road and Park Avenue are both streets designated as arterial or collectors on the MS&R Map. The site must be designed to meet full code compliance once the additional right-of-way is taken to widened the roads or a future site and landscape plan that demonstrates how the site will meet code requirements in the future must be submitted for review and approval. Additionally a recorded MS&R covenant will be required. Please show on the plan, the future right-of-way as well as the intersection widening. The future right-of-way line, sidewalk, and curb must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned. See engineering comments related to future right-of-way. Additional; comment may forthcoming related to building setback based on the future right-of-way line and future curb location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 10. If applicable all existing or proposed easements must be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, type, width, and purpose of the easement must be labeled. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 11. If applicable indicate the location, type, and height of freestanding lighting. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 12. See landscape reviewer comments related to landscape border, screening, and NPPO requirements. DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 13. Revise the zoning classifications for the south and west parcels. Per the D.U.P.D. zoning maps the west and south parcels are zoned R-2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.28 14. Under the existing and proposed use note, add the LUC subject to section number, 3.5.13.5. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 15. Revise the following development criteria. a. Revise the development designator from 30 to "31". b. Revise the floor area ratio to .90 (90%). Revise the FAR calculation accordingly. c. Provide copies of the current Certificate of Occupancy for both buildings. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\DSC\T05CM00047.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 03/03/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 03/04/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Drainage Report and Site Plan review DATE: 4-7 March 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM00047 T15S, R14E, Section 7 Engineering Division has reviewed the Subject items, and approvals are not recommended at this time. Please provide a revised site plan and a revised drainage report addressing the comments provided below. Revisions to the drainage report may result in necessary revisions or additions to the site and grading plans. Please assure all applicable revisions are depicted on the site and grading plans. The report and site plan may not be approved without demonstration that all required onsite improvements can be provided within future property limits, upon Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) widening. Please provide a revised drainage report, revised site plan, and a response letter addressing each comment provided. The following comments are offered: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1. Revise the text in the Objective/Purpose paragraph to reflect the client for whom the report was prepared, in accordance with the City of Tucson's Standards Manual For Drainage Design and Floodplain Management - Development Standard 10-02.0, Section 2.3.1.1 C. 2. Specify the name, address and telephone # of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, and liability of the drainage improvements described in the report. List any other documents where these responsibilities are documented (DS 10-02.0, Section 2.3.1.2 E ). 3. Provide discussion/analysis of the size, location and hydrologic characteristics of the adjoining watershed and regulatory flow potentially affecting this site. TSMS Node BR-NO311 indicates a verified Q100 of 472 CFS at the intersection of Park Ave. and Drexel Road. Include details/discussion of existing roadway improvements, including but not limited to existing curbing and roadway configurations, storm drains, etc. (DS 10-02.0, Sec. 2.3.1.3 A 2). 4. Provide either a topographic map at a scale of one inch equal to 200 feet or larger, or preferably a photo-topo showing the items listed in sub-section a-d (DS 10-02.0, Sec. 2.3.1.3 A 3). 5. Provide a detailed floodplain analysis in the report, addressing all items listed in Section 2.3.1.4 C 1-8 (DS 10-02.0). 6. Describe and present any hydraulic system(s) proposed to return flow to natural or existing locations and magnitudes along the downstream property line (DS 10-02, Sec. 2.3.1.5 B & F). 7. Clearly describe, depict and label the size and type of inflow and outflow structures for the detention basin, with dimensions and elevations of critical portions of each structure noted. Indicate the maximum water surface elevation/limits of ponding and any erosion protection (riprap) sizing and dimensioning (DS 10-02, Sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 and DS 10-01.5.2.6). 8. Provide a detention basin maintenance checklist in the report (DS 10-02 Sec. 2.3.1.6 C 2 a & b). 9. Revise the report, site and grading-paving plans to indicate detention basin discharge to the Drexel Road right of way rather than the adjacent property to the east, as it appears this may present adverse impact to this property. Provide scupper conveyance/sizing calculations in the report for conveyance of the 10-year flow (minimum) - basin discharge - under the sidewalk. Provide appropriate notation on the site and grading plans for scupper construction and related details (DS 2-08.5.1 E & 3-01.4.4 F). SITE PLAN: 1. Revise or omit the right of way labeling ("R/W") along the interior of the 10' Landscape Buffer for Park Ave. , a it does not correspond with the property lines depicted. 2. Depict and label future sight visibility triangles based upon intersection widening and future curb locations for both major streets affecting this project, in accordance with the City's Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan & City Development Standards (DS 2-02.2.1.10 & DS 3-01.5.B 2). 3. Please assure accurate cut and fill quantities are provided. All fill, including that for within the proposed building's footprint, must be included (DS 2-02.2.1 A 17). 4. The proposed dumpster location is not accessible for solid waste vehicles. Depict maneuverability/access to the dumpster, assuring 36' inside, and 50'outside turning radii are provided in accordance with Development Standards 2-02.2.1 A 32 and 6-01.0. 5. Depict and label new 6' sidewalks, 2' from back of curb along each property frontage, in accordance with Mayor and Council policy directives for new sidewalks along designated Major Streets and Routes. 6. Depict and label 18' minimum unobstructed radii at all locations where a Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) intersects another PAAL, where emergency and solid waste vehicles maneuver (DS 3-05.2.1 C 3 a). 7. Include notation for sidewall bollards to be installed, and specify a minimum of 10' between the bollards, in the trash enclosure details (DS 6-01.4.0). 8. Depict and label 25' curb returns at the ingress/egress location per Sections 5.5 and 6.3.1(5) of the TAMG's, and Development Standards 3-01.4.3 B & 3-01.10 Figure 6. 9. Provide a note on the plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities" (DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2). 10. Depict scuppers; fully labeled and dimensioned at basin outflow locations, in accordance with drainage report recommendations. Assure all items on the site plan match drainage report recommendations (ref. item 9, above). 11. Provide an elevation for the project benchmark referenced. GENERAL: Grading plan review and approval requires completion and submittal of a grading permit application with two sets or copies of the grading plan, for grading permit issuance purposes. The grading plan must indicate all revisions that occur to the site plan and drainage report, as applicable. Please ensure the site and grading plans are consistent with one another prior to resubmittal. Resubmittal will require a revised Drainage Report and site plan addressing all items listed above. Subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans and/or drainage report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 03/07/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the basin slopes to comply with DS 10-01.0 (Stormwater Manual, p.78). The basin slopes should be no steeper than 2:1. 2) Street landscape borders are required to be located based on the MS&R right-of-way line. Revise the site and landscape plans to show the MS&R right-of-way line and include dimensions for the street landsape borders. 3) A 6' masonry wall is required to screen the proposed loading area from all property lines within 100 ft. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4) The property is required to be screened from Drexel Road and Park Avenue with a continuous 30" high screen. Additional plantings are required to create the continuous screen required. LUC 3.7.3.7.C 5) Revise the site and landscape plans to indicate the height and a reference point for measurement of any walls on the site. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 6) Clarify where detail 7 a on sheet A1.1 applies. 7) Revise the plans to provide curbing, or other suitable barrier at the perimeter of the vehicular use area to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 8) Revise the site and landscape plans to remove parking from the street landscape border. The street landscape border is required along the entire street frontage, except for only the driveway. DS 2-06.3.4.C 9) Plantings within the street landscape border are to be selected from the approved plant list. DS 9-06 Existing citrus trees are only allowed if they were planted prior to Feb. 15, 1991. Based on the photos submitted, that does not appear to be the case. The trees may be relocated to a designated "oasis area" on the site. See LUC 3.7.2.2.C.3 and DS 2-06.3.2. 10) A minimum of one qualifying canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points. Revise the plans to provide the required number of canopy trees. LUC 3.7.2.4 11) Keynote 6.9 should be used on the native plant preservation plan. DS 2-15.6.0 Add a note to the preservation plan indicating that the preserved-in-place plants will be fenced per DS 2-15.6.0. 12) Detail 9 requires revision to comply with DS 2-15.6.0. The area to be fenced shall be beyond the drip-line of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the drip-line radius. |
| 03/09/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the native plant inventory to rate the plants per DS 2-15.3.2. Categories include Low, medium, and high. 2) Include only protected native plants on the native plant inventory. DS 2-15.3.1.A.2, LUC 6.2.16 3) Revise the calculations on sheet L1.1. One worksheet should be prepared for each species: A) Line 1 should be 9 based on the inventory list. B) Line 3 should list the number of preserved-in-place plants C) Line 9 should list only the number of preserved trees with a caliper in excess of 6". Revise preservation credit. D) Preservation credit should not be listed for "other cacti" as no protected cacti appear on the inventory. 4) Add note to the native plant preservation indicating that meatl tags with inventory number will be used per DS 2-15.3.1.A.1 5) Add note to the preservation plan indicating compliance with the fencing standards of DS 2-15.6.0. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/28/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Stop |
| 03/10/2005 | ANY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Stopped |