Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T05BU02934
Parcel: 107031890

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T05BU02934
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/08/2006 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied February 8, 2006
TO: Amco Enterprises, Inc.
SUBJECT: Site Plan: Building Addition, 2420 N Jackrabbit Avenue
REVIEWER: Loren Makus
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM05118

SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Permit Application were reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on February 8, 2006. It was not approved. Please address the following comments.

Site Plan Comments:

1. Delineate, label and dimension the sight visibility triangles for each driveway/PAAL location. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10) For details on the sight visibility triangles reference Development Standard 3-01.5.0

The Grading plan will be approved after the site plan has been approved.
Revise the Site Plan to address this comment and resubmit two copies for review. Include a letter explaining the comment has been addressed. If you have any questions or if you wish to discuss any of these comments, I can be reached at 520.791-5550 ext 1161 or by email at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov.
Loren Makus, E.I.T.
Senior Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
02/21/2006 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Site plan approval is necessary to continue review.
03/15/2006 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 03/15/06

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Principal Planner

Comments:

As of this review date it does not appear that teh site plan and landscape plans havbe been approved.

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/28/2006 ADRIANNE OLIVO OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/28/2006 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed