Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T05BU02934
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 01/16/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 12/21/2005 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 12/27/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | December 28, 2005 TO: Amco Enterprises, Inc. SUBJECT: Site Plan: Building Addition, 2420 N Jackrabbit Avenue REVIEWER: Loren Makus ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05CM05118 and T05BU02934 SUMMARY: The Site Plan and Grading Permit Application were reviewed by Development Services Department, Engineering Division on December 28, 2005. It was not approved. Please address the following comments. Site Plan Comments: 1. Delineate, label and dimension the sight visibility triangles for each driveway/PAAL location. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.10) For details on the sight visibility triangles reference Development Standard 3-01.5.0 2. In the Drainage Statement, clarify the relation between the FEMA reference mark and the COT benchmark used as the basis of elevation for the Site Plan. Clarify whether the lowest floor elevation on the Site Plan is in reference to the COT datum or to the FEMA datum. 3. Revise the proposed refuse container to provide concrete-filled steel posts at the sides of the enclosure as well as at the back. There must be at least 10 feet clear between the posts on opposites sides of the enclosure. (DS 6-01.4.2.C) 4. Provide water surface contours for the watercourse/floodprone area. (DS 2-02.2.1.A.15) 5. Clarify the delineation of the proposed sewer easement (Key note 11). Use a distinct symbol to indicate the boundaries of the easement. Grading Plan Comments A grading permit is required for this project. A grading permit application was received. The Civil Improvements plan sheets should be revised in accordance with the following comments. The plans must also be revised to address any changes in the Site Plan. 1. Provide general dimensions for the basins, sidewalks, parking area access lanes and other site features. 2. Clearly delineate the extent of proposed grading. 3. Revise solid waste enclosure to provide concrete-filled steel posts at the sides as well as at the rear of the enclosure. Revise the Site Plan and Grading Plan to address all of these comments and resubmit two copies of each for review. Include a letter explaining how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions or if you wish to discuss any of these comments, I can be reached at 520.791-5550 ext 1161 or by email at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Approved |